Seirdybit confused about u-photo versus u-logo regarding avis. my profile photo looks intentionally abstract (https://seirdy.one/favicon.svg), so i wouldn't describe it as a "photo". but it's not a placeholder either.
Loqi[chee] as @tantek mentioned on irc, this would be a great opportunity to say something like "still image or set of still images" so it's clear that "u-photo" is not just for literal photographs
gRegorSeirdy, if you want that favicon to show up in your h-card, e.g. in your author information beside a post, I would recommend it be the h-card's u-photo
Seirdyif your key is distributed via WKD you just enter an email address and it spits out cryptographically-verified account information, like webfinger or rel-me.
Seirdyim most interested in their work on finding a way to distribute a signed text file with the simplicity of WKD because that way they could move from pgp to something else
Seirdyalso, curious: we've got h-card, legacy hCard, vCard4, WebFinger, and now Ariadne (the spec that keyoxide implements) for distributing contact info. is there any prior art on interop between them?
Seirdyif there's a way to translate between the 5 aforementioned open standards that can fill the "machine-readable contact information for a person" use-case, then implementing just one way to "hydrate" an empty profile could open the door to hydrating a profile using any of the existing open standards.
Seirdyi think vCard should be the common denominator since everyone who has themselves in their phone's address book has one. just "share contact" to hydrate any profile.
[tantek]the vocabulary is fine, except for perhaps vCard3 vs vCard4 differences, which I'd recommend going with vCard4 which is then compatible with h-card
Seirdyand profile hydration implementations won't have to "choose" which standard to implement; they can just start with vCard4 and maybe later add special features like verification for ariadne or mf2