#trwnhh-entry question: h-entry is defined as "for episodic or datestamped content". am i correct in saying that non-episodic, non-datestamped content should NOT be marked up with .h-entry? for example, a "page" that is not a "post" is likewise not an h-entry. (but it might be some other as-yet-unspecified thing?)
[aciccarello], [Murray], IWSlackGateway, [qubyte], barnaby, Guest6, [mattl]1, [jeremycherfas]1, [schmarty]1, [KevinMarks], to2ds and [snarfed] joined the channel
#[snarfed]hmm, that definition might be overly strict
#gRegorI thought mine had h-entry too, but looks like I used h-card, which makes sense
fluffy joined the channel
#[tantek]trwnh, episodic or datestamped content is the typical use-case for h-entry yes, however any page on the web has at a minimum a "last modified" date that is returned via HTTP, and thus h-entry makes sense as a default fallback for "what top level microformat should I use on this page"