[tantek][snarfed] in this case, since the image is purely decorative rather than relevant to the content, it would be fine to mark it as such with alt="" role="presentation"
[tantek]it's an eye-candy image right? you don't actually mean to imply Bridgy Fed has anything to do with Tomorrowland / Walt Disney, or creating futuristic cities do you?
[tantek]in general mf2 parsers try do do the most correct semantic HTML thing, so there should never be a concern of the form "that's fine for HTML, but would it make mf2 parsers [do the right thing]?"
[tantek]that's the point, always focus on getting the HTML "right" first, then see if there is anything special you have to do for microformats, because we try to minimize that as much as possible.
[tantek][snarfed] like what would someone reading via a screen reader experience when viewing your post? "Tomorrowland / Walt Disney" out of context like that would seem nonsensical so presumably you don't want that read out loud
[snarfed]so it sounds like there's no general or other way to exclude the text content of an element inside p-* or e-* from the mf2 parsed property value
[snarfed] example: the "Tomorrowland / Walt Disney" image caption is included in e-content here, https://pin13.net/mf2/?url=https://snarfed.org/2024-10-30_53932 , but ideally it wouldn't be
[tantek] [snarfed] a-ha I have a citation for you! https://www.w3.org/WAI/tutorials/images/decorative/#example-4-image-used-for-ambiance-eye-candy