khleedrilcreated /Talk:h-review (+296) "Created page with "With regards to p-rating, my understanding is that the value goes from p-worst to p-best, not necessarily 0-5. Whatever the meaning of p-worst and p-best needs clarifying I think, especially the bit that says p-best can be less than p-worst: can someone give an example where this might be used?"" (view diff)
gRegorHi Khleedril, are you around in the chat? We don't usually use the wiki Talk pages much these days. Chat and/or the github issues are probably better for that.
khleedrilcreated /Talk:microformats2 (+128) "Created page with "The list here does not agree with that on the h-review main page. Which is correct? I believe the list here is the proper one."" (view diff)
daleHi, in the wiki there are two definitions of h-review: one on h-review's own page and one on the microformats2 page. They do not agree with each other, but I believe the latter to be correct. Does anybody have any insight into this?
gRegorThat might be from the time when mf2 was first being set up, so working on all the new properties and backcompat in one place made sense. Not sure, just a guess.
daleThe other thing I noticed on the spec page is p-rating is stated as taking values from 0-5, but I think they go from p-worst to p-best with the assumpion that they are 0 and 5 if not specified. I think this needs clarifying, especially the case when p-best is less than p-worst (is there a use-case for this?)
gRegorThe h-review spec is correct based on familiarity with it and community consensus changes in recent years. For example, `e-description` has been standardized to `e-content` based on trying to re-use properties from other micorformat objects, like `h-entry`. Similarly for `dt-published` and `p-author`
gRegorThose two properties let you change the scale, though. Yeah, different direction of the scale is possible, though I'm not aware of any examples currently.