#microformats 2025-12-10

2025-12-10 UTC
barnaby, jeremycherfas, _dissolve22[d], IWDiscord, girlonthemoon and Dryusdan joined the channel
#
ulhar4409 Is there an established convention for annotating content warnings?
#
[snarfed] unofficially p-summary, but that's probably an antipattern
#
[snarfed] more: https://indieweb.org/content_warning#proposed_p-content-warning
#
[tantek] interesting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_warning
#
ulhar4409 [snarfed]: summary would probably be a decent stopgap for my usecase, a lot of the time I'd want a cw is because I'm posting weird furry art
gRegor, [snarfed], jeremych-, barnaby, sebbu, [benatwork], [eri] and [KevinMarks] joined the channel
#
[KevinMarks] <details><summary>warning here</summary> content here </details> is also pretty robust
#
ulhar4409 that's my usual go to for this
#
[tantek] that expression has always made me want to find an excuse to say "my usual if then for this" or "my usual for loop this"
#
ulhar4409 that's my usual `(with-html (:details (:summary "warning here") "content here"))` :P
#
gRegor lol