#social 2014-10-21

2014-10-21 UTC
Loqi joined the channel
#
harry np
#
Loqi harry: tantek left you a message on 10/16 at 9:45am: could you get back to cmhobbs about the status of his invited expert application? he hasn't heard back yet.
#
cmhobbs 'lo
#
harry will do - but not right now, in middle of something else
jtauber and Tsyesika joined the channel
#
cmhobbs no worries
#
cmhobbs harry, a couple of weeks ago, i believe evan mentioned talking to me as well but i haven't heard anything
#
harry I am OK with folks dialing in as long as they've been approved or are waiting to talk to chairs in more detail.
#
tantek I'm OK with folks dialing in to just lurk even if they haven't been officially approved. I figure that kind of community/contextual-learning is only a good thing.
#
harry ditto!
#
harry Sorry, in middle of dealing with bugs that Web Team discovered today
#
harry in the spec publication
#
tantek go go go harry!
#
harry very minor but it threatens slowing down the process until after TPAC unless we resolve
#
tantek one day W3C publication process will be automated so that all checks can be done by the editor in advance and then it just becomes a matter of linking to the WG resolution to publish as often as we want. today is not that day.
#
cwebber2 hello *
evanpro joined the channel
#
evanpro Hi all
#
tantek welcome evanpro
#
evanpro tantek: thank you
#
tantek btw - freshly posted by adactio on IndieWeb building blocks they got numerous folks up & running with social personal sites last weekend in Nürnberg: https://adactio.com/journal/7698
elf-pavlik joined the channel
#
evanpro I started laying out the schedule for TPAC
#
evanpro https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/TPAC
#
evanpro But we need to get it more specific
oshepherd joined the channel
#
bret morning :)
#
oshepherd Evening
#
Arnaud evanpro: we should add to the F2F page instead of creating a new page
jasnell joined the channel
#
evanpro Arnaud: I don't know about the other page
#
evanpro Can you link?
#
oshepherd Has the meeting time shuffled (primarily has the US changed DST in the last couple of weeks?)
#
Arnaud I added a link to today's agenda: https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2014-10-27
#
jasnell no zakim?
#
Arnaud we have two options we need to choose from
#
evanpro trackbot, start meeting
#
trackbot is preparing a teleconference.
RRSAgent joined the channel
#
RRSAgent logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/10/21-social-irc
#
Arnaud I put a strawman schedule
#
trackbot RRSAgent, make logs public
#
RRSAgent I have made the request, trackbot
Zakim joined the channel
#
trackbot Zakim, this will be SOCL
#
Zakim ok, trackbot; I see T&S_SOCWG()1:00PM scheduled to start in 1 minute
#
trackbot Meeting: Social Web Working Group Teleconference
#
trackbot Date: 21 October 2014
#
evanpro chair: evanpro
#
oshepherd Oh, I'm just slightly early for a change :)
#
evanpro Yes
#
Arnaud so, we need to merge the two :)
#
evanpro Zakim, who's on the call?
#
Zakim T&S_SOCWG()1:00PM has not yet started, evanpro
#
Zakim On IRC I see RRSAgent, jasnell, oshepherd, elf-pavlik, evanpro, Tsyesika, jtauber, Loqi, tantek, AdamB, cmhobbs, Arnaud, shepazu, KevinMarks, cwebber2, rhiaro, wilkie, bret,
#
Zakim ... tommorris, kylewm, mattl, aaronpk, trackbot, botie, sandro, wseltzer
#
evanpro Hmmm
#
evanpro OK
#
cwebber2 I think I'm in
#
rhiaro will be on and off irc, don't think I can call in
#
jtauber Zakim, what's the code?
#
Zakim the conference code is 7625 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), jtauber
#
elf-pavlik stuck on gas station, can do only IRC and not sure for how long on this hot spot :(
#
oshepherd No hello/goodbye notifications?
#
tommorris Apologies for absence: been feeling sub-par as a result of continuing medical treatment.
#
evanpro Arnaud: that's such a better structure
#
Arnaud looks like Zakim isn't reporting people joining in again
#
evanpro Let me see if I can copy that over
#
evanpro Probably not quickly
#
Arnaud zakim, this is socl
#
Zakim ok, Arnaud; that matches T&S_SOCWG()1:00PM
#
Arnaud zakim, who's on the phone?
#
Zakim On the phone I see +1.514.554.aaaa, jasnell, ??P5, Arnaud, ??P7, [IPcaller], AdamB
#
evanpro Zakim, aaaa is me
#
Zakim +evanpro; got it
#
Zakim +??P10
#
jtauber Zakim, [IPcaller] is me
#
Zakim +jtauber; got it
#
bret Zakim, ??P10 is me
#
Zakim +bret; got it
#
bret (I think)
#
jasnell fyi... laptop battery likely not going to last the full hour.. may end up dropping off irc at some point... we will see tho
#
Zakim -??P7
#
Zakim hears ??P5's hand up
#
Zakim sees ??P5 on the speaker queue
#
jasnell wow.. that's super irritating
#
Zakim +??P7
#
cwebber2 Zakim: , ??P5 is me
#
cwebber2 oops
#
evanpro Whoever is leaning on their phone, PLEASE STOP
#
cwebber2 Zakim, ??P5 is me
#
Zakim +cwebber2; got it
#
oshepherd Zakim, ??P7 is me
#
Zakim +oshepherd; got it
#
Zakim +[IPcaller]
#
evanpro Zakim, who's on the call?
#
Zakim On the phone I see evanpro, jasnell, cwebber2, Arnaud, jtauber, AdamB, bret, oshepherd, [IPcaller]
MarkCrawford joined the channel
#
wilkie Zakim, IPcaller is me
#
Zakim +wilkie; got it
#
cwebber2 honk honk
#
bret Zakim, mute me
#
Zakim bret should now be muted
#
Zakim + +1.703.670.aabb
#
elf-pavlik if we mute/unmute this way it will not get into minutes!
#
Zakim -oshepherd
#
evanpro https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2014-10-21#Agenda
#
MarkCrawford Zakim, +1.703.670.0920 is me
#
Zakim sorry, MarkCrawford, I do not recognize a party named '+1.703.670.0920'
#
evanpro Zakim, who's on the call?
#
Zakim On the phone I see evanpro, jasnell, cwebber2, Arnaud, jtauber, AdamB, bret (muted), wilkie, +1.703.670.aabb
#
evanpro AdamB, would you mind scribing?
#
MarkCrawford zakim, +1.703.670.aabb is me
#
Zakim +MarkCrawford; got it
#
Zakim +??P7
#
evanpro scribe: AdamB
#
oshepherd Zakim, ??P7 is me
#
Zakim +oshepherd; got it
#
Zakim +Lloyd_Fassett
#
AdamB evan: first item approving last weeks minutes
#
evanpro http://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2014-10-14-minutes
#
AdamB ...pretty important resolutions in the minutes ....
harry joined the channel
#
AdamB ... any objections to approving?
#
harry waves
#
AdamB .... minutes have been approved
Lloyd_Fassett joined the channel
#
AdamB RESOLVED: Approval of Minutes of 14 October 2014
#
AdamB evan: like to talk about upcoming face to face ... unfortunately have 2 diff schedules
#
AdamB ... will use Arnaud version
#
Arnaud +q
#
Zakim sees ??P5, Arnaud on the speaker queue
#
Zakim +??P16
#
Arnaud ack ??P5
#
Zakim sees Arnaud on the speaker queue
#
AdamB .... first covering overall direction as a group, where we are going
#
tantek Zakim, ??P16 is me
#
Zakim +tantek; got it
#
AdamB ... discussing AS 2.0 and moving that forward
#
evanpro ack Arnaud
#
Zakim sees no one on the speaker queue
#
AdamB .... new efforts coming up around Social API and Federation protocol ... F2F best time to discuss those
#
AdamB Arnaud: first would like to ask people ...schedule of tpac provides 11am to 5pm for adhoc group breakouts ... put together on F2F page for two possible options to choose from
#
tantek agreed that f2f is a good time to discuss API and federation protocol work
#
AdamB ... ... as a working group we should decide our approach ... on that list is straw man to start discussion
#
Zakim + +1.408.335.aacc
#
AdamB ... think we should choose between these 2 options
#
elf-pavlik q+ re: any news from OpenSocial?
#
Zakim sees elf-pavlik on the speaker queue
#
AdamB ... could mix for example, could do option 1 on monday and option 2 on tuesday
#
tantek I am also participating in the AC meeting as an AB member. So would prefer not to conflict with that.
#
AdamB evan: one way to max. productivity by taking first day to address 3 major goals of this group
#
AdamB ... if conversation goes well on monday will likely have tuesday then to do more break out sessions
#
AdamB evan: suggesting option 1 on monday and 2 on tuesday
#
tantek Option 1 on Monday, and Option 2 on Tuesday works for me too
#
tantek I would drop "WG Dinner" since usually that's a good time for cross-group pollination
Shane and jkorho joined the channel
#
AdamB proposal of: option 1 on monday and tuesday do more break out sessions during the mid day break
#
elf-pavlik q-
#
Zakim sees no one on the speaker queue
#
evanpro +1
#
jasnell +0
#
wilkie +0
#
jtauber +0
#
bret +0
#
tantek +1 with including federation protocol on Monday, and no WG Dinners
#
elf-pavlik +0
#
MarkCrawford +1
#
cwebber2 I'm abstaining from all the TPAC votes since I won't be there ;)
#
Zakim +??P18
harry joined the channel
#
Zakim -??P18
#
evanpro Zakim, q?
#
Zakim I see no one on the speaker queue
#
MarkCrawford WG dinner on Monday or Tuesday?
#
harry Zakim, what's the code?
#
Zakim the conference code is 7625 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), harry
#
Zakim +??P18
#
MarkCrawford Tuesday is AC dinner
#
Shane Zakim, ??P18 is me
#
Zakim +Shane; got it
#
Shane Zakim, mute me
#
Zakim Shane should now be muted
#
harry Monday would work!
#
Zakim +??P19
#
Zakim -??P19
#
Shane Hi all, sorry I'm late
#
Zakim +[IPcaller]
#
harry Zakim, IPcaller is hhalpin
#
Zakim +hhalpin; got it
#
tantek Tuesday has AC dinner that Arnaud (and Tantek) will attend
#
tantek can we have a quick poll of who where in IRC will be at TPAC and which days?
#
tantek e.g.
#
tantek MTWThF
#
AdamB evan: given this structure can we break up the day on monday in to 3 blocks
#
harry MTWThF
#
MarkCrawford MTWThF
#
rhiaro MTWThF
#
AdamB MTWTh
#
AdamB evan: are ok with leaving agenda for day 2 relatively open and putting that together at the end of day 1
#
MarkCrawford Can we have some time for use case presentation from the SocialIG?
#
AdamB arnaud: seems to make sense
#
AdamB evan: some have been discussing proposals ... this is the optimal time to start making suggestions for presentations etc
#
AdamB ... asking that folks that are willing to do that to post to the email list and will fit in to those slots on afternoon of monday
#
harry Notes that Matt Marum isn't on the call - not sure who from OpenSocial is presenting their take on things
#
AdamB ... 5-10 minute presentations
#
oshepherd I have a proposal I'll email in this week (but unfortunately can't attend TPAC)
#
evanpro oshepherd: that sounds great
#
tantek can we skip email middleman and just edit wiki schedule directly to add ourselves?
#
harry Zakim, who's making noise?
#
evanpro tantek: yes, that's fine
#
Zakim harry, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Arnaud (28%)
#
elf-pavlik harry, anyone from OpenSocial in https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35125/TPAC2014/registrants#SW ?
#
MarkCrawford q+
#
Zakim sees MarkCrawford on the speaker queue
#
evanpro ack MarkCrawford
#
Zakim sees no one on the speaker queue
#
AdamB arnaud: referencing marks question about giving some time to social IG use cases
#
Arnaud TPAC attendance: All week
#
AdamB MarkCrawford: have narrowed down the use cases ... continuing to work them ... would like to share them to the WG
#
AdamB ... important for us in the IG to report back on where we stand at this point
#
AdamB evan: sounds great, make time on tuesday morning on that?
#
AdamB MarkCrawford: that should work, schedule around use case task force leader availability
#
AdamB evan: lets plan on tuesday barring any objections
#
Arnaud +q
#
Zakim sees Arnaud on the speaker queue
#
MarkCrawford q-
#
Zakim sees Arnaud on the speaker queue
#
evanpro ack Arnaud
#
Zakim sees no one on the speaker queue
#
KevinMarks I may be remote too
#
AdamB Arnaud: remote participation .. elf and shane remote is all right now? are there others planning to call in?
#
oshepherd I might try and call in - haven't had time to look at timing yet
#
Shane I've not checked the times yet for whether I can remote, I think there will be issues with timezones, but we shall we
#
Shane *see
#
elf-pavlik q+ re: who will participate on Wed in Schema.org and Social WG? https://www.w3.org/wiki/TPAC2014/SessionIdeas#Schema.org_and_Social_WG
#
Zakim sees elf-pavlik on the speaker queue
#
AdamB Harry: all the rooms have polyphones ... can put a bridge booking request in now
#
tantek q+ to also offer broadcasting AV with talky.io for remote particpants to listen/watch
#
Zakim sees elf-pavlik, tantek on the speaker queue
#
evanpro ack tantek
#
Zakim tantek, you wanted to also offer broadcasting AV with talky.io for remote particpants to listen/watch
#
Zakim sees elf-pavlik on the speaker queue
#
AdamB evan: sounding like a general framework and with the chairs can resovle the schedule
#
AdamB tantek: think its fine to just add directly to wiki
#
cwebber2 that'd be great
#
AdamB ... for remote participation I can setup a audio/video broadcast using Talkie RTC session
#
KevinMarks talky++
#
Loqi talky has 3 karma
#
AdamB evan: will be able to show screen?
#
Shane Yeah talky has show screen
#
AdamB tantek: it can pick from multiple inputs
#
Zakim +??P19
#
elf-pavlik talky sounds great!
#
Zakim -??P19
#
AdamB ..including screen share
#
harry KevinMarks, I can't find your W3C account.
#
AdamB waht about the network issues ?
#
harry Do you have one?
#
harry A user-name?
#
AdamB slow network?
#
AdamB tantek: also setup an etherpad (sp?) especially if we start doing breakouts
#
AdamB ... can be hard to follow IRC
#
Shane During indiewebcamps etherpads have been extremely useful
#
AdamB evan: sounds great, lets do both
#
evanpro ack elf-pavlik
#
Zakim elf-pavlik, you wanted to discuss who will participate on Wed in Schema.org and Social WG? https://www.w3.org/wiki/TPAC2014/SessionIdeas#Schema.org_and_Social_WG
#
Zakim sees no one on the speaker queue
#
elf-pavlik ^
#
AdamB tantek: this is all in addition to IRC
bblfish joined the channel
#
KevinMarks kmarks2 is apparently my username, but when I try to reset I get stuck
#
AdamB harry: in response to elf-pavlik question .... breakout session on wednesday to talk about Schema.org and Social WG
#
KevinMarks I'm happy to start a new account but it didn't like me trying that with an email it had seen (kevinmarks@gmail.com)
#
AdamB evan: I will be there
#
AdamB ... def some coordination needed there
#
elf-pavlik evan: could you add yourself to that section in a wiki?
#
AdamB harry: its an open space 1hr session. good to be there from beginning but can drop in at any time
#
tantek q+ to advocate asking for folks to join the SocialWG
#
Zakim sees tantek on the speaker queue
#
elf-pavlik https://www.w3.org/wiki/TPAC2014/SessionIdeas#Schema.org_and_Social_WG
#
AdamB arnaud: tpac registry is officially closed but can register on site
#
bret oh wow
#
harry Note we are running at capacity
#
cwebber2 guess for sure doing remote participation then now :)
#
AdamB harry: our social group space is completely booked
#
harry However, some folks who are "observers" won't show
#
tantek Zakim, who is being noisy?
#
Zakim I don't understand your question, tantek.
#
evanpro Probably me!
#
harry Zakim, who's making noise?
#
Zakim harry, listening for 12 seconds I heard sound from the following: hhalpin (71%)
#
AdamB harry: space is booked because of observers ... members have priority over them
#
harry Also, speaking of WG members, I'm trying to double-check IEs - one of chairs, e-mail me the list of folks that need to be approved so I can double-check?
#
tantek q?
#
Zakim sees tantek on the speaker queue
#
evanpro ack tantek
#
Zakim tantek, you wanted to advocate asking for folks to join the SocialWG
#
Zakim sees no one on the speaker queue
#
harry For schema.org meeting, please add name to wiki here:
#
harry https://www.w3.org/wiki/TPAC2014/SessionIdeas#Schema.org_and_Social_WG
#
AdamB tantek: regarding about participation ...since we are full for monday and tuesday if you are attending as observer please join as member
#
harry Actually, I suspect Ralph Swick will be leading, but I proposed
#
KevinMarks is trying to join but w3c password process designed by Kafka
#
AdamB ... for folks that do plan on wednesday session about schema and social wg .. for those attending from social wg strongly encourage them to join
#
harry KevinMarks, you can just email sysreq@w3.org I think
#
evanpro q?
#
Zakim sees no one on the speaker queue
#
harry but try to reset passwords
#
harry agenda?
#
Zakim sees nothing on the agenda
#
AdamB evan: this wraps up tpac conversation
jasnell joined the channel
#
tantek encourage them to join *the Social WG*, so that we don't have to do discussions in side-meetings.
#
AdamB ... next want to talk about AS 2.0 working draft
#
harry q+
#
Zakim sees harry on the speaker queue
#
harry I can give an update from W3C side
#
Zakim -oshepherd
#
evanpro OK, harry, will ack in a moment after jasnell
#
AdamB jasnell: first cut working draft are in and been working with harry fixing up details on html validation. hopefully those are resolved
#
Zakim +??P3
#
AdamB ... one question about the Actions draft
#
Arnaud if you're not registered but plan to attend, please add your name to https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2014-10-27#Participation
#
oshepherd Zakim, ??P3 is me
#
Zakim +oshepherd; got it
#
elf-pavlik q+ re Reference issues inline in the spec. https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/29
#
Zakim sees harry, elf-pavlik on the speaker queue
#
harry Its kinda weird to hold on actions since the drafts are very interlinked.
#
AdamB ... way the docs are right now the first public working draft points to the editor draft
#
harry Zakim, who's making noise?
#
Zakim harry, listening for 11 seconds I heard sound from the following: evanpro (34%), jasnell (100%)
#
evanpro Sorry, other people in my office
#
AdamB I missed the question
#
tantek has anything changed re: the questions asked last week about Actions?
#
AdamB due to noise
#
tantek if no new information, let's not re-open the question
#
AdamB harry: still trying to aim for thursday pub date ... because all 3 drafts are linking to each other the linking validation fails
#
tantek the AS and vocab drafts shouldn't need to link to Actions - this doesn't make sense
#
AdamB ... wouldn't be good to publish all 3 together would have re-write links
#
Arnaud the question is whether we can publish Actions draft along with AS 2.0 Core and Vocab
#
KevinMarks I am logged in now, but boy that was hard
#
elf-pavlik tantek, core has section on PotentialAction which uses terms from Actions Vocab
#
tantek using pub process as an excuse to publish a previously unapproved draft is kind of bad form
#
tantek so drop the crosslinks to Actions
#
AdamB ... in terms of just pure publication have them heavily linked and not on w3c space makes publishing little bit trickier
#
tantek just comment them out
#
tantek substantial reasons / questions - all in last week's minutes
#
tantek no implementation experience with Actions
#
harry The problem is everything is densely interlinked so we have to do changes to drafts.
#
tantek it was a bunch of political +1s with no pragmatic questions asked
#
elf-pavlik just remove PotentialAction section?
#
AdamB jasnell: actions piece is still an open question ... def. interesting in working on but was missing clear use cases so objection was raised due to that
#
AdamB arnaud: minutes from last week show that clearly
#
evanpro Zakim, q?
#
Zakim I see harry, elf-pavlik on the speaker queue
#
elf-pavlik s/remove/move to dedicated spec/
#
AdamB ... there is interest in group but non documented yet
#
Loqi elf-pavlik meant to say: just move to dedicated spec PotentialAction section?
#
AdamB jasnell: base on that we don't have documented ones for AS either
#
MarkCrawford implementations are not necessary until we get further along
#
tantek why not just cut everything to do with Action from the first two drafts?
#
harry Sorry, W3C team publishing requires links to resolve
#
tantek is such commenting out more than 5 min of work?!?
#
elf-pavlik +1 tantek
#
AdamB jasnell: does look to be a public link issues from publishing perspective
#
harry and github.io doesn't do fragment id links
#
harry So, we can just remove links to Actions Drafts
#
harry that's fine with me, it may delay things a bit.
#
KevinMarks +1 on links having to resolve
#
AdamB ... could just publish with actions but that still doesn't commit the wg to do anything with it
#
evanpro ack harry
#
Zakim sees elf-pavlik on the speaker queue
#
tantek harry - why does a 5 minute commenting-out task delay things?
#
harry Or we can put a weird snapshot of the Editors Draft somewhere outside github.io
#
bret Shouldn't use cases be examples where there exists some kind of implementation, standardized or not?
#
tantek we're spending more time talking about it than it would take to comment out the links
#
bret not just, ideas
#
AdamB harry: we hit a hitch in w3c because of the links not resolving .. in general want them to resolve properly
#
AdamB ... it might slow things down past thursday
#
AdamB evan: is it reasonable to kick out actions for the first version
#
harry q+
#
Zakim sees elf-pavlik, harry on the speaker queue
#
AdamB jasnell: could do that .. basic actions has been in AS since the begining
#
Shane That makes sense to me
#
AdamB ... could do that if that is what this group wants
#
elf-pavlik +1 move actions to dedicated spec
#
MarkCrawford as an editors draft, why can't we publish w/o the links to gain a broader audience for the work and get more feedback?
#
AdamB evan: from my view ... since some discussion and not competely essential to core would suggest trim them out now and address later on
#
tantek q+ to discuss this as evidence of modularity failure
#
Zakim sees elf-pavlik, harry, tantek on the speaker queue
#
evanpro ack elf-pavlik
#
Zakim elf-pavlik, you wanted to discuss Reference issues inline in the spec. https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/29
#
Zakim sees harry, tantek on the speaker queue
#
elf-pavlik ^
#
elf-pavlik i got impression last week that James agreed
#
harry activitystrea.ms
#
tantek it is a modularity failure because an AS2 implementation does not need to know anything about Actions
#
elf-pavlik <wilkie> elf-pavlik: jasnell said that they would be included in the spec as yellow highlighted sections that link to the github issue I believe
#
tantek therefore the spec shouldn't need to
#
AdamB harry: its not a modularity issue but a links not resolving ..other issue was AS namespace referenced within
#
MarkCrawford Harry - does the resolving links requirement apply to all versions, or just final?
#
harry 404 errors
#
harry which is just not acceptable
#
AdamB ... lot of links get 404 errors which is not acceptable
#
AdamB ... could monkey patch the links out
#
tantek Proposal: comment out all the links to Actions (and relevant contextual text) from the two drafts.
#
AdamB jasnell: the AS namespace is personally owned by ??? is maintained by AS on github
#
harry s/???/Chris Messina
#
AdamB ... i have access to that domain. larger question is do we want to keep that domain / namespace or not?
#
Shane Would it be better to move them to the w3 domain, perhaps wiki?
#
AdamB thanks harry!
#
Arnaud good question, shouldn't we switch to a w3c namespace?
#
harry q+
#
Zakim sees harry, tantek on the speaker queue
#
harry ack harry
#
Zakim sees tantek on the speaker queue
#
Zakim sees tantek, harry on the speaker queue
#
harry q+
#
Zakim -Shane
#
elf-pavlik https://w3id.org/ ?
#
harry nope, doesn't count
#
Zakim +??P4
#
tantek is the namespace issue a FPWD blocker?
#
Shane Zakim, ??P4 is me
#
Zakim +Shane; got it
#
Shane Zakim, mute me
#
Zakim Shane should now be muted
#
harry w3id.org has no more status than activistrea.ms
#
tantek if it's not a FPWD blocker then we should postpone discussing
#
oshepherd elf-pavlik: No, http://w3.org/<blah>
#
tantek let's get past FPWD please
#
harry it is currently kinda blocking FPWD
#
evanpro q?
#
Zakim sees tantek, harry on the speaker queue
#
AdamB evan: two big issues: 1. adding or removing actions 2. removing AS in the namespaces
#
evanpro ack tantek
#
Zakim tantek, you wanted to discuss this as evidence of modularity failure
#
Zakim sees harry on the speaker queue
#
harry i.e. I'd like to make some changes to the doc but want to make sure the WG is OK with it.
#
elf-pavlik evanpro, can we come back to my question after you ack me?
#
evanpro acked
#
harry i.e. we can probably monkey-patch the Action links out
#
evanpro elf-pavlik: yes, please put yourself back on the queue
#
elf-pavlik q+ re Reference issues inline in the spec. https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/29
#
Zakim sees harry, elf-pavlik on the speaker queue
#
evanpro Sorry about that
#
harry but we need to also resolve activitystrea.ms
#
AdamB tantek: given existing impl have not had to know anything about actions that the spec rec doesn't need to refer to it either. that is what i mean by modularity failure
#
AdamB ... its like a layering failure
#
Zakim -Lloyd_Fassett
#
oshepherd +1 on modularising spec appropriately. If ActivityStreams is extensible, actions should be able to live on its' own
Tsyesika joined the channel
#
Shane I think the activitystrea.ms should redirect to a page on w3.org, it is unlikely it will dissapear then
#
AdamB ... no reason core spec should have to mention it at all. so suggestion its completely commenting out from spec.
#
evanpro ack harry
#
Zakim sees elf-pavlik on the speaker queue
#
AdamB .. lets pospone any first draft issues
#
Lloyd_Fassett Zakim +Lloyd_Fassett
#
tantek any *non* first draft issues
#
AdamB harry: namespace is pretty close to a blocker
#
harry We can remove all links to activitystrea.ms
#
tantek let's do that
#
tantek remove all links that break
#
harry 1) we could comment them out directly
#
harry 2) we could replace them with w3.org names
#
AdamB harry: could remove them, comment them out but that is weird cause they are referenced
#
AdamB .. could replace with w3c ones
#
harry 3) we could ask ChrisM to update real quick so they don't 404
#
harry I'm OK with any with those
#
AdamB ... or could update domain so they don't 404
#
oshepherd If we go for (2), is it possible to make those names always redirect to latest draft?
#
AdamB jasnell: does have access so can do it
#
Zakim +Lloyd_Fassett
#
AdamB ... just need to have the time
#
AdamB evan: its more about the 404 than the namespace issue
#
AdamB harry: its kind of weird ... its been done but not common
#
evanpro Can we use http://www.w3.org/Social/WG ?
#
Arnaud +q
#
Zakim sees elf-pavlik, Arnaud on the speaker queue
#
tantek I'm ok with external URLs / namespace
#
AdamB ... should at least dedicate real thought sometimebefore last call
#
tantek simplest thing
#
AdamB .. have to fix broken links now
#
evanpro s/activitystrea.ms/www.w3.org/Social/WG/
#
Loqi evanpro meant to say: Can we use http://www.w3.org/Social/WG ?
#
tantek comment out the broken links, "fix" in next draft
#
harry we gotta do something about broken links now, the external namespace issue we can deal with later
#
AdamB evan: james, can we setup way to fix broken links
#
harry The easiest thing is to just probably comment them out
#
Arnaud solution: remove the links for now, open an issue on namespace to use
#
AdamB jasnell: can try to get it done before end of week but not positive i can get it done
#
tantek I'd say if you can't fix the links in the next hour, then let's comment them out for FPWD
#
Shane That's probably the best way, for FPWD
#
tantek that buys us more time to make a considered decision rather than rushed
#
AdamB harry: i can comment them out for now and add them back in later? are people ok with this?
#
MarkCrawford +1 on commenting out the links
#
AdamB evan: maybe comment out and open issues to add them back in
#
harry I'll put an clearly editors draft
#
AdamB harry: will do that and mark as editors draft
#
harry redirect Actions links to the Editors draft
#
evanpro q?
#
Zakim sees elf-pavlik, Arnaud on the speaker queue
#
harry that should solve all our linking issues
#
tantek why not just comment out Actions?
#
harry Yeah, we could also comment out Actions as well.
#
tantek that's better for modularity anyway
#
tantek which is why I'm pushing for that
#
AdamB harry: will just comment out all broken links
#
elf-pavlik +1 move actions out of core
#
tantek this also sets a good precedent for the group
#
harry We can probably still push things out by Thursday if Webmaster isn't too rushed and all this link commenting works
#
tantek if your spec has broken links after we've agreed to publish it, then we will comment out the links
#
tantek I think that's a reasonable policy to adopt
#
harry +1
#
tantek it will strongly encourage editors to do a trivial linkcheck EARLY and OFTEN
#
harry just need to be fair but also realize W3C, being what it is, can't publish broken links :)
#
oshepherd thinks if as.ms is to be the namespace, it should probably be under W3C control (but thats probably a discussion for a later date)
#
evanpro q?
#
Zakim sees elf-pavlik, Arnaud on the speaker queue
#
tantek harry - totally agree with not publishing broken links (404)
#
evanpro ack elf-pavlik
#
Zakim elf-pavlik, you wanted to discuss Reference issues inline in the spec. https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/29
#
Zakim sees Arnaud on the speaker queue
#
harry yep, let's save that for a later date - I trust Chris Messina personally
#
elf-pavlik [from last week minutes] <wilkie> elf-pavlik: jasnell said that they would be included in the spec as yellow highlighted sections that link to the github issue I believe
jasnell joined the channel
#
elf-pavlik [from last week minutes] <wilkie> elf-pavlik: jasnell said that they would be included in the spec as yellow highlighted sections that link to the github issue I believe
#
AdamB evan: discussing elf question
#
tantek oshepherd long term stable domains are challenging aren't they?
#
AdamB ... not sure understand what the issue is yet elf
#
jasnell OK... I forgot that line item
#
oshepherd tantek indeed
#
AdamB Arnaud: it has to highlighting within the text with the issue
#
jasnell I can add those in today
#
elf-pavlik jasnell, thx!
#
KevinMarks is this a fragmention use case?
#
jasnell That's a minor fix
#
AdamB tantek: believed would be called out inline within the document. we agreed to publish with that being the case
#
jasnell Yes
#
AdamB evan: jasnell can we get this in?
#
jasnell That's a quick one
#
AdamB jasnell: yes
#
harry I would say we do "inline issues" on next WD
#
evanpro q?
#
Zakim sees Arnaud on the speaker queue
#
evanpro ack Arnaud
#
Zakim sees no one on the speaker queue
#
Zakim sees harry on the speaker queue
#
harry q+
#
elf-pavlik harry, how about -comments mailin list?
#
AdamB Arnaud: we should use what ever is the most efficient way to the document out. but should put in a tracker for what namespace should be used going forward
#
evanpro ack harry
#
Zakim sees no one on the speaker queue
#
jasnell Oy... Ok
#
tantek harry - except that we agreed to publish *with* the issues inline.
#
AdamB harry: need those inline issues within the next hour to make it by thursday
#
tantek jasnell - can you add those issues inline in next hour?
#
elf-pavlik jasnell, please :)
#
harry The issue is that this requires yet another cycle from W3C to fix up, so I say send *exact* issues to mailing list
#
AdamB jasnell: i can try to get it in the next hour but very difficult. if there are higher priority ones send email and i can try to do them by most important
#
AdamB harry: webmaster needs 1 day to review it
#
elf-pavlik issues: https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/29
#
AdamB ... thats how publications always worked
#
elf-pavlik jasnell, just 4 main issues there
#
AdamB how hard does that make it for adding issues in the future? does webmaster always have to review those too ?
#
KevinMarks managed to log into the wiki too - something must have propogated
#
tantek I'm ok with waiving this requirement for FPWD
#
tantek elf - are you ok with postponing linking inline to issues until next draft?
#
Shane Is the issue about Hydra actually an issue of the spec? I don't think it is, just perhaps something to discuss later possibly
#
elf-pavlik I think we at least need to mention missing JSON-LD @context in examples, but other 3 would also make sense from my POV
#
harry yep
#
AdamB harry: inclined to suggest to link this in later
#
harry https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues
#
harry https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/36
#
tantek and does anyone else object to publishing FPWD without the inline issues?
#
harry I mean, we link to the identifers
#
harry there's 15 issues
#
harry all RDF related
#
harry and opened by elf
#
harry I'm not sure if this is really blocking
#
AdamB Arnaud: sounding like we go with out the links are we don't go .. not sure if elf would like to hold up the process for that or not
#
jasnell Those links aren't critical in my opinion. Not as a blocker.
#
jasnell There is a link to the issues list in the draft
#
elf-pavlik can we at lest mention missing @context ?
#
harry Yes, we do link directly to the tracker
#
evanpro elf-pavlik: are you comfortable with going to FPWD without these links?
#
AdamB tantek: if there is only a single objection its the chair prerogative to declare rough consensus
#
Shane I think we need to get it to FPWD
#
harry I'm inclined to say "no"
#
evanpro Otherwise, we won't get the doc out
#
AdamB ... if we are risking not getting it out i don't think its worth postponing for this right now
#
elf-pavlik i will not block but would appreciate at least mention of missing JSON-LD @context in examples, and maybe one about _:post
#
harry OK, so that's already linked and examples have @context assumed called out
#
AdamB jasnell: yeah thats as simple as a link ... but if we have no place to host that officially but there is a link to that context in document already
#
evanpro elf-pavlik: that's already called out
#
AdamB evan: since it's called out maybe take an action to link directly but willing to go with what we have right now
#
elf-pavlik with a link to context at that stage?
#
Shane Sorry I have to rush away, thanks everyone.
#
Zakim -Shane
#
evanpro elf-pavlik: we'll have that, yes
#
AdamB harry: most working groups only call out substantial issues directly in the spec
#
elf-pavlik anyways, i trust in your decision folks so just go ahead without including that request from me
#
harry For example, WebCrypto had 170+ bugs
#
harry we called like 5 out in text
#
harry inline
#
elf-pavlik ok, end of this topic?
#
evanpro q?
#
Zakim sees no one on the speaker queue
#
harry agenda?
#
Zakim sees nothing on the agenda
#
tantek admin: we're also 4 min over
#
AdamB evan: would like to wrap up agenda items we have open and defer to next week at F2F, any objections?
#
tantek no objection
#
AdamB ... ok would like to adjourn
#
Zakim -jtauber
#
tantek +1 adjourn
#
Zakim -jasnell
#
bret nice meeting have fun next week
#
oshepherd Regrets on not being there in person
#
harry I'll do some editing and will keep trying to get docs out by Thursday, but no promises :)
#
Zakim -tantek
#
bret will try to remote
#
Zakim -Arnaud
#
Zakim -Lloyd_Fassett
#
Zakim -MarkCrawford
#
Zakim -evanpro
#
Zakim -hhalpin
#
Zakim -cwebber2
#
tantek c'mon harry, commit!
#
Zakim -AdamB
#
Zakim -oshepherd
#
Zakim -bret
#
Arnaud harry, do we have a meeting room #?
#
harry I'll ask Susan, but I haven't been told
#
Arnaud would be good to add that info to the meeting page
#
Zakim -wilkie
#
harry susan@w3.org knows
#
harry Arnaud, please send me list of accepted IEs
#
harry so I can double-check right now
#
Arnaud this info seems to be lagging
#
Arnaud here is what's currently available (because I asked ;-) http://www.w3.org/2014/11/TPAC/schedule.html
#
harry I think there's some last minute room re-arrangment going on to TPAC being overbooked.
#
AdamB trackbot, end meeting
#
trackbot is ending a teleconference.
#
trackbot Zakim, list attendees
#
Zakim As of this point the attendees have been +1.514.554.aaaa, jasnell, Arnaud, AdamB, evanpro, jtauber, bret, cwebber2, oshepherd, wilkie, MarkCrawford, Lloyd_Fassett, tantek,
#
Zakim ... +1.408.335.aacc, Shane, hhalpin
#
trackbot RRSAgent, please draft minutes
#
RRSAgent I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/10/21-social-minutes.html trackbot
#
trackbot RRSAgent, bye
#
RRSAgent I see no action items
#
elf-pavlik goes back hichhiking :) ciao o/
#
evanpro AdamB: thanks!
#
AdamB you bet
#
tantek harry: https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/invited-experts
#
AdamB i won't be arriving until about 12:00 on monday
#
Loqi I added a countdown for 10/27 12:00am (#5527)
#
tantek linked right there on our home page: https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg#Members
#
tantek AdamB - go ahead an add yourself to https://www.w3.org/wiki/Irc-people
#
tantek For anyone interested in the Social API work in this WG, if you're in SF, make your way to see benwerd's talk today at 17:00 PDT at Moscone: http://werd.io/2014/the-web-is-your-api-feeds-and-actions-using-html5
#
Zakim disconnecting the lone participant, +1.408.335.aacc, in T&S_SOCWG()1:00PM
#
Zakim T&S_SOCWG()1:00PM has ended
#
Zakim Attendees were +1.514.554.aaaa, jasnell, Arnaud, AdamB, evanpro, jtauber, bret, cwebber2, oshepherd, wilkie, MarkCrawford, Lloyd_Fassett, tantek, +1.408.335.aacc, Shane, hhalpin
#
KevinMarks hm, so I have w3c profile, I can edit the wiki, but I can't log into the invited experts form
#
KevinMarks oh wait, I can if I try 3 times
#
KevinMarks o_O
#
tantek harry: ^^^
#
harry that's great KevinMarks
#
harry fill it out ASAP
#
tantek please pass that along to #sysreq / system folks. seriously
#
harry yeah that is kinda weird, I already cc'ed sysreq@w3.org once on this
#
tantek the cc'ing will continue until the reliability improves?
#
KevinMarks the popup for affiliation is quite the thing too
bblfish joined the channel
#
wilkie KevinMarks: the propagation among w3 services is atrociously slow. my advice is to now never change your password.
#
tantek perhaps we should eliminate W3C's need to have a password
#
harry haha
#
tantek this is feasible today by implementing IndieAuth instead
#
harry just bring it up at TPAC and email sysreq@w3.org
#
tantek ok I'll do that!
jasnell joined the channel
#
bret i was having issues signing in/setting a pw but I realized i was mixing up email address and username :/
#
bret woops
#
Zakim excuses himself; his presence no longer seems to be needed
bblfish, tantek and nicolagreco joined the channel