#social 2015-08-17
2015-08-17 UTC
tantek and jasnell joined the channel
# jasnell Hello all. I would appreciate some feedback on https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/pull/199
# KevinMarks so this is explictly designed to break compatibility with the existing activity streams api that it shares with OpenSocial?
# KevinMarks and eschews actual paging in favour of making callers fetch each object in the collection individually?
# KevinMarks that's what I get from reading the diffs
the_frey and the_frey_ joined the channel
# jasnell Activity Streams 1.0 did not include paging, and a variety of implementations implemented paging inconsistently with one another such that there was very little interop. Paging was not added to the core spec until I put it into the 2.0 draft. This does propose a change that is not backwards compatible with that original approach in order to make the vocabulary model easier to implement for those working from a linked data perspective
# ben_thatmustbeme is there really a need for totalItems any more?
# ben_thatmustbeme would it make more sense as it being identified as a partial collection vs full collection then?
# ben_thatmustbeme and be similar to a "page" really then
# ben_thatmustbeme my concern of giving numbers when you are talking social networking is that those numbers can potentially move pretty fast
# ben_thatmustbeme same reason i didn'
# ben_thatmustbeme t like have page number etc
jasnell joined the channel