#social 2015-08-17
2015-08-17 UTC
tantek and jasnell joined the channel
#
jasnell Hello all. I would appreciate some feedback on https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/pull/199
#
KevinMarks so this is explictly designed to break compatibility with the existing activity streams api that it shares with OpenSocial?

#
KevinMarks and eschews actual paging in favour of making callers fetch each object in the collection individually?

#
KevinMarks that's what I get from reading the diffs

the_frey and the_frey_ joined the channel
#
jasnell Activity Streams 1.0 did not include paging, and a variety of implementations implemented paging inconsistently with one another such that there was very little interop. Paging was not added to the core spec until I put it into the 2.0 draft. This does propose a change that is not backwards compatible with that original approach in order to make the vocabulary model easier to implement for those working from a linked data perspective
#
ben_thatmustbeme is there really a need for totalItems any more?

#
ben_thatmustbeme would it make more sense as it being identified as a partial collection vs full collection then?

#
ben_thatmustbeme and be similar to a "page" really then

#
ben_thatmustbeme my concern of giving numbers when you are talking social networking is that those numbers can potentially move pretty fast

#
ben_thatmustbeme same reason i didn'

#
ben_thatmustbeme t like have page number etc

jasnell joined the channel