2015-10-06 UTC
# 
csarven As rhiaro was trying to rephrase tantek's point earlier; if in the absence of explicit types, one can derive the type via explicit properties -- that sounds reasonable to me. However, two things to consider: 1) whether that alternative is just necessary or not 2) whether that is of interest or should be part of something that the WG needs to deliver. I don't have a strong view on this.. just hoping that it is not overlooked.