#social 2016-04-19
2016-04-19 UTC
jasnell, jaywink, barnabywalters, Karli, tantek and eprodrom joined the channel
# Loqi Tantekelik made 1 edit to [[Socialwg/2016-04-19]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=98098&oldid=98083
# Loqi Aaronpk made 1 edit to [[Socialwg/2016-04-19]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=98099&oldid=98098
annbass joined the channel
sandro joined the channel
eprodrom joined the channel
# eprodrom present+
bengo joined the channel
RRSAgent joined the channel
# RRSAgent logging to http://www.w3.org/2016/04/19-social-irc
Zakim joined the channel
# eprodrom present+
# bengo present+
# eprodrom anyone can scribe?
# KevinMarks present+
# bengo I will scribe
# eprodrom scribe: bengo
# bengo eprodrom: Let's get started. First agenda item is approval of minutes from last week
# eprodrom +1
# Karli + 1
# KevinMarks +1
# bengo +1
# eprodrom PROPOSAL: approve minutes of 12 Apr 2016
# eprodrom RESOLVED: approve minutes of 12 Apr 2016
# bengo eprodrom: Great. That's all for administrative items, right?
# bengo eprodrom: May be important to note we're 6 weeks away from Portland F2F. Probably time to make travel plans
# bengo s/6/8
# bengo eprodrom: next up - Document Status
# bengo eprodrom: Tried to resolve all issues [for AS2] Working Draft but some issues were too complex to resolve
# bengo eprodrom: There is a new Editor's Draft that covers quite a few issues, but not all
# bengo eprodrom: I'll dig through remaining issues 1 by 1
# bengo eprodrom: #297 - Still ahven't resolved, whether we'll drop questions or add a 'Cosed' tag. Need tow ork through with jasnell
# bengo eprodrom: 296 - Unfortunately, only 50/170 examples have 'name', even thugh it's SHOULD.
# Loqi Abasset made 1 edit to [[Socialwg/2016-04-12-minutes]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=98100&oldid=98052
# bengo eprodrom: One way to resolve is have spec be more specific about which object types SHOULD have name. Alternatively, add .name to all examples. Discussing with jasnell
# bengo eprodrom: #292 - Think we have resolution on this one. Just haven't added it yet.
# bengo eprodrom: 289 - Relationship object. I have reviewed this, and there are some use cases for social networking that we would not be able to represent without this object. So I think we need to remove it in a way that accomodates those use cases, or keep it for now.
# bengo eprodrom: 249 - There are some activity types with properties that are optional that are not explained in the examples. The prob is there are half a dozen and I need to get them updated in all representations, not just JSON, RDFa and the rest too.
# bengo eprodrom: But there has been good progress this week on exit criteria, conformance, etc. Just want to make sure we do the right thing on these last issues
# bengo eprodrom: So do we go to WD as it stands? Or take another week to resolve the remaining issues
# eprodrom q?
# bengo eprodrom: For my purposes, I'd prefer taking another week to finalize issues before WD
# eprodrom q?
# bengo eprodrom: How to handle all the types of examples in AS2 spec. It is burdensome to keep them all up to date.
# bengo eprodrom: Wondering if there is a way to edit just JSON and have it render to the other formats
# bengo eprodrom: microdata, RDFa, turtle are onerous
# bengo eprodrom: Gonna hold off on worrying for now. If anyone can take on editing those dialects, that would be big help.
# bengo annbass: I just thought, if he were the one who created it, he may have a technique for all the transforms
# eprodrom AS2 questions?
# bengo eprodrom: Next up. Webmention
# bengo eprodrom: but first. Any updates on documents other than that?
# eprodrom Other document status updates?
# KevinMarks doing it though code transforms is a good idea, as it helps clarify generality
# eprodrom ack cwebber
# bengo cwebber2: Hello. We've been working through issues on ActivityPub
# bengo cwebber2: We've decided to allow submitting objects not-wrapped in Activity, and processor would treat as Create
# bengo cwebber2: One area of debate: putting audience targeting on that object (not activity). Jessica thought it would be weird to have audience target on object only in client-to-server.
# eprodrom q+
# bengo cwebber2: Instead we could put no audience targeting on the object, and server would assume a default (e.g. public + followers)
# eprodrom ack eprodrom
# bengo eprodrom: A huge part of AS2 is having that access control. All of the object types in AS2 support audience targeting. So it seems straightforward to allow it. Dropping them seems like step backwards to me
# bengo cwebber2: Got it. That was slightly my preference too but wanted group feedback.
# bengo cwebber2: Updated draft maybe coming in next week
# eprodrom ack tantek
# bengo tantek: We had discussion in the past whether we should distinguish for developers when to use each spec. Access control is a key feature for both AS2 and ActivityPub. Maybe we can call that out explicitly.
# eprodrom rhiaro: are you on the call?
# bengo eprodrom: rhiaro has that come up before?
# eprodrom ack cwebber
# bengo cwebber2: Audience Targeting is a key feature of ActivityPub, but with AS2 it's supported feature, not implied/core. You can think about using activitystreams in just a published feed like Atom (without targeting).
# bengo eprodrom: This is a good issue to bring up and write about in "Social Protocols"
# eprodrom ack annbass
jasnell_ joined the channel
# bengo annbass: I have on paper a bunch of edits (logic/English correctness). I think they would be best for me to send via snailmail to jasnell but couldn't get address. eprodrom can I send to you?
# bengo eprodrom: yes
# eprodrom ack aaronpk
# bengo aaronpk: Micropub status
# bengo aaronpk: There have been a few changes since latest WD on March 1. Couple of simplifications of syntax. Ultimately minor.
# bengo aaronpk: Also been working on parallel update that is unpublished. It takes into account f2f discussion on converting JSON syntax to ActivityPub style. In the meantime, someone came along and implemented the ED in node.js Supports Create Update Delete.
# bengo aaronpk: So I tried to get feedback on spec, and he said he prefers existing syntax to new one. And there were some benefits of old one that couldn't be accomodated in new syntax.
# bengo aaronpk: That leaves us still looking for more implementations and more feedback.
# bengo eprodrom: Can other group members help?
# bengo aaronpk: Take a look at the alternate version.
ben_thatmustbeme joined the channel
# bengo sandro: Should we link from current ED to alternative and ask for feedback?
# bengo aaronpk: idk
# bengo aaronpk: The bulk of the Content changes in this alternative version. Most obvious in 'Update' section
# bengo aaronpk: Something else that came from feedback. I was leaning toward everything except create requiring JSON format. But the implementor said it wasn't too hard to also support formencoded, since the key/value structure is so similar
# bengo eprodrom: What would next steps be?
# bengo aaronpk: I'm not sure. Easiest thing for me is make no changes.
# bengo eprodrom: Open an issue on GitHub to invite discussion? I don't want you to get stuck on this without a clear transition. If you're willing to make a decision, group will respect that.
# KevinMarks do other existing implementations support both formencoded and json, or just formencoded?
# KevinMarks document support?
# bengo aaronpk: There's an existing issue for it
# bengo eprodrom: Let's give it a week for participants to look it over
# bengo aaronpk: works for me. After call, I'll update the issue to document this
# bengo ?
# eprodrom ack tantek
# bengo tantek: Is this the second implementation of micropub ED? or WD?
# bengo aaronpk: There are several implementations of creating posts linked from spec. In many languages. For updating/deleting, there are now two. This was second, and it was based on Mar 1 WD.
# bengo tantek: Was the first implementation your own server?
# bengo aaronpk: Yes
# bengo tantek: So this is first external feedback. Can we see if the two versions interoperate.
# bengo aaronpk: I want to do a validator for micropub, but it's on TODO list for now. Could test interop be using against each other. I'll add that to my list. Using this new implementation to edit posts on my site and in theory they should interoperate
# eprodrom TOPIC: PDX F2F logistics
# bengo aaronpk: Meeting is in a couple months. ESRI was going to host event but doesn't make sense anymore
deiu joined the channel
# bengo aaronpk: I found a local company that can host. Close to old location so shouldn't require hotel changes
# bengo aaronpk: They can provide coffee, snacks, meeting room. However, they don't have room for catered lunch. So I was planning on lunch reservations and nearby restaurants
# bengo aaronpk: I would appreciate if someone could help sponsor the lunches.
# bengo aaronpk: If that's the best option, I'll make sure I can find a place that can split check. Sound ok?
# bengo tantek: Is this close to food trucks? Good option for separate paying.
# bengo aaronpk: Yeah there are many food carts within five blocks
# bengo aaronpk: Only downside is fragmented lunch discussion time, but we could bring food back to F2F.
# bengo +1 to outside
# sandro aaronpk, can you update https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2016-06-07 with the new location....?
# eprodrom Thumbs up for getting out
# bengo aaronpk: Should we do food carts bothd ays and no reservation?
# bengo IMO yes
# bengo decentralized food choices
# bengo aaronpk: I'll update the wiki page
# bengo tantek: What about inviting local developers? Does new location make this more possible?
# bengo aaronpk: There isn't enough room to have more people. We'd have to hang out at the parks.
# bengo aaronpk: could be challenging. Lunch downtown is popular.
# bengo tantek: Do you think it would appear to local developers?
# bengo aaronpk: I'm not sure many would take us up on it. So I'm happy to not bother with the offer.
# bengo eprodrom: We could do happy hour or dinner out with devs.
# bengo aaronpk: That would be easier
# eprodrom social happy hour
ben_thatmust joined the channel
# bengo eprodrom: Let's talk webmention
# bengo aaronpk: I've had good feedback from webmention.rocks. 21 tests for endpoint discovery.
# bengo aaronpk: 1 test for update portion of webmention spec.
# bengo aaronpk: Results have been promising. Most people passed endpoint discovery test, there are 2 or 3 that are tricky because of Link tag/header edge cases.
# bengo aaronpk: Out of all 21, 17 different people were able to successfully reply to at least one. Of those, almost all use different implementations. ~13 distinct implementations.
# eprodrom Great news on that
# bengo aaronpk: For update test, it was only released Saturday. Looks like ~4 implementations passed though.
# bengo aaronpk: I'm going to work more on update and counting results.
# bengo eprodrom: Next steps?
# bengo aaronpk: Write more tests to cover rest of spec. More formally gather results and report on them.
# eprodrom q?
# bengo aaronpk: Still have some issues
# bengo aaronpk: One issue, waiting on IANA rel registry updates
# bengo aaronpk: I resolved many issues. Though some are 'waiting for commenter' since original commenter/reporter hasn't acked
# bengo aaronpk: My question is "What is left before this can be CR"?
# bengo eprodrom: As we did with AS2, we have to assess exit criteria for Webmention. And have a vote when we take to CR.
# bengo aaronpk: Do exit criteria have to be in before CR or during/after?
# bengo sandro: before
# bengo aaronpk: So I'll work on that this week and maybe propose CR next week
# bengo aaronpk: I would like to propose publishing a new WD based on current ED
# bengo tantek: Looking at the changes, it looks like they're significant enough to publish WD ASAP, given e.g. CSRF improvements
# eprodrom PROPOSED: Publish new working draft of Webmention based on 15 April 2016 editor's draft
# eprodrom PROPOSED: Publish new working draft of Webmention based on 15 April 2016 editor's draft
# bengo +1
# eprodrom +1
# KevinMarks +1
# eprodrom RESOLVED: Publish new working draft of Webmention based on 15 April 2016 editor's draft
# bengo aaronpk: I'll create a github issue for exit criteria on Webmention
# eprodrom that's all, folks
# bengo Do I need to do anything to end scribing?
# RRSAgent I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/04/19-social-minutes.html trackbot
# bengo umm no. I can copy paste out of my IRC client? Looking for export function now
# bengo ok I'm running to a meeting but will keep an eye here for that tool
# annbass try this: http://pandoc.amy.gy/
# bengo Just did this maybe it is close to right
# Loqi Bgoering made 1 edit to [[Socialwg/2016-04-19-minutes]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=98101&oldid=0
# Loqi Aaronpk made 1 edit to [[Socialwg/2016-06-07]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=98102&oldid=98051
# Loqi aaron: annbass left you a message 17 seconds ago: he's swell ;-) http://socialwg.indiewebcamp.com/irc/social/2016-04-19/line/1461092031971
# tantek greetings #social - I've created the stub Agenda for next week's telcon: https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2016-04-26
# tantek please add individual discussion items to the section named as such: https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2016-04-26#Discussion_Items
# Loqi Tantekelik made 1 edit to [[Socialwg/2016-04-26]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=98103&oldid=0
# Loqi Aaronpk made 1 edit to [[Socialwg/2016-06-07]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=98104&oldid=98102
# aaronpk just updated the f2f page with the new location, and added transportation info from the airport https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2016-06-07#Transportation
# Loqi Aaronpk made 1 edit to [[Socialwg/2016-06-07]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=98105&oldid=98104
# tantek aaronpk do you remember where the photos ended up from the March MIT f2f? https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2016-03-16
# tantek when you post them could you put one on that page like https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-12-01
# tantek and then update the main page photo too? https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg
# Loqi Aaronpk made 2 edits to [[Socialwg/2016-06-07]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=98107&oldid=98105
# Loqi Tantekelik made 1 edit to [[Socialwg]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=98108&oldid=98044
# aaronpk and updated with hotel info: https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2016-06-07#Hotels
# aaronpk I also made a map with a bunch of relevant locations: https://goo.gl/72luEI (also linked from the meeting page)
# Loqi Aaronpk made 1 edit to [[Socialwg/2016-06-07]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=98109&oldid=98107
# tantek just looked at Documentation. most of that should be moved to a /Socialwg/research page - it's background for work that we're doing
# Loqi Tantekelik made 1 edit to [[Socialwg]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=98110&oldid=98108
# Loqi Tantekelik made 1 edit to [[Socialwg]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=98111&oldid=98110
KevinMarks, jasnell, barnabywalters and ben_thatmustbeme joined the channel