#social 2016-10-13

2016-10-13 UTC
jasnell, KevinMarks, csarven, KevinMarks2, timbl_, timbl and cwebber2 joined the channel
#
csarven Procrastination has no boundaries: http://rdf.greggkellogg.net/distiller?format=turtle&in_fmt=rdfa&uri=https://linkedresearch.org/ldn/linked-data-notifications-overview.svg
#
csarven The overview diagram in https://www.w3.org/TR/ldn/#figure-linked-data-notifications-overview has clickable anchors to respective sections in the spec.
#
csarven or elsewhere in the case of ldp:inbox, ldp:contains, and RFC GET/HEAD/POST
jasnell joined the channel
#
@csarven #LinkedData Notifications https://www.w3.org/TR/ldn/ ? ED: https://linkedresearch.org/ldn/ has #SchemaOrg examples. @danbri et al, feedback welcome! ? (twitter.com/_/status/786573254844489728)
shepazu joined the channel
#
cwebber2 so for something like this, where a commenter requests something and then we do it
#
cwebber2 https://github.com/w3c/activitypub/issues/135
#
cwebber2 would we mark that as "commenter satisfied" since we did exactly what they said
#
cwebber2 or leave it unlabeled?
#
aaronpk if they requested something specific and you did exactly that, then it's safe to mark it as commenter satisfied
#
cwebber2 cool
#
cwebber2 thanks aaronpk
KevinMarks, timbl, jasnell_, timbl_ and jasnell joined the channel