#social 2017-02-23

2017-02-23 UTC
KevinMarks, timbl, KjetilK__, evanminto and Karli joined the channel
#
@csarven .@W3C #LinkedData Notifications https://www.w3.org/TR/ldn/ output http://rdf.greggkellogg.net/distiller?format=ntriples&in_fmt=rdfa&uri=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FTR%2Fldn%2F https://twitter.com/csarven/status/834731782587162624/photo/1 (twitter.com/_/status/834731782587162624)
#
@csarven #LinkedData Notifications cloud including the @W3C specification https://www.w3.org/TR/ldn/ , an implementation and it… https://twitter.com/i/web/status/834730892027424768 (twitter.com/_/status/834730892027424768)
timbl joined the channel
#
@coreload Linked Data Notifications Candidate recommendation https://www.w3.org/TR/ldn/ (twitter.com/_/status/834788455498395650)
#
aaronpk the link to the implementation report is 404
#
aaronpk er, the link in the "status" section here https://www.w3.org/TR/ldn/
#
csarven oops
#
csarven Linked at the top of the doucment at least.
#
aaronpk yeah
#
csarven This was the same copy as in the first CR
#
aaronpk you can probably make that page on github that at least links to the real URL
#
aaronpk oh wait no you can't. that isn't a real github URL
#
csarven i noticed that recently in the top of the document.. who reads the 'status of this document' any way :P
#
aaronpk how did that ever pass any of the document checks?
#
aaronpk the tool looks for links and throws a warning on ones that are 404
#
rhiaro weird, yeah, it passed linkchecker
#
rhiaro and the denis check
jasnell joined the channel
#
csarven are on their way.
#
csarven Comment re the # of LDN implementations that I mentioned in the last call. That's not the same as what's visible right now under lr.org /summary. We had preliminary test reports submitted (which is what I was reflecting on) and they all looked good. Since then there was some revisions on the reports output, so right now we are in the process of getting those implementations to submit their reports again as the "official" reports. Some are already in, others
cwebber joined the channel
#
cwebber I'm still not sure which one is a better "entry point" property to use, in general, in a collection pointing to collectionpages
#
Loqi cwebber: csarven left you a message 1 day, 2 hours ago: Do you have a FOAF URI of some sort?
#
cwebber is "first" better, or "current"?
#
cwebber csarven: FOAF URI for myself?
#
cwebber I would like to, in general, embed one of them into a full CollectionPage when someone selects say a user's inbox, but have the other one be a url
#
cwebber I've been having "first" be the expanded one, but maybe it should be "current", since there's also "last"
#
cwebber and I don't feel the need to expand "last"
#
cwebber csarven: I don't have a FOAF for myself iirc. I probably did back when I was on statusnet :)
#
csarven No worries. Happy to have you regardless, as a fragment in the spec :P
#
cwebber heh ;)
#
csarven Linking to your site any way
evanminto joined the channel