• #social 2017-05-15
  • Prev
    Next
  • #social
#social ≡
  • ←
  • →
2017-05-15 UTC
# 13:48
cwebber2
re: c2s types, I'm not saying an implementation *can't* accept unknown types in c2s, just saying I personally think it's probably not a good idea. The spec doesn't block it, other than the awkwardness around the SHOULD on wrapping non-activity objects in a Create