#saranixemoji is pretty much the opposite of semantics. might as well mark up random entropy. same result.
#melodycould tags be used like for hashtags and mentions? "tag":[ { "type":"Emoji", "href":"http://emoji.uri/my_custom_emoji.png", "name":":custom_emoji:"}] ?
xmpp-social and cdchapman joined the channel
#aaronpkCustom emoji is essentially sharing arbitrary images so maybe the solution is to denote that an image in a post should be styled inline with the text
#jaywinkI want to at some point have emoji reactions like on Slack, but that would be an extension for sure. So like likes, but the reaction is an emoji
#erincandescent<cwebber2> I guess since the xhtml dream died (:teardrop:) adding a machine-readable custom property for an emoji name is unlikely to work <-- <img data-emoji="foo" src="https://../">?
howl, KevinMarks and KevinMarks_ joined the channel
#saranixcsarven: emotionml is very interesting. It seems they were developing it at the exact same time that I developed my ontology. Good news is it seems my info can be encoded using these standard without loss (I think)
#xmpp-social[ajordan] csarven: I used to hate emoji because I feel like they don't belong in Unicode but now I'm completely hooked on them so I don't know how to feel :P
#Gargronoh-oh, i am looking at the implementation report template.md and it has things like "MUST use application/ld+json; profile="blahblah"" for things. mastodon accepts that mime type but i dont think i use it in response headers or request headers, i just use application/activity+json, is that a problem?
#cwebber2Gargron: I can do so, gimme a sec to hook up my mic
#erincandescentGargron, cwebber2: Hmm, the spec doesn't /specifically/ state what content type is to be used for server-to-server requests. It probably should