#social 2017-09-09
2017-09-09 UTC
#
xmpp-social [ajordan] Embedded <img>?
dmitriz joined the channel
#
xmpp-social [ajordan] Lol XHTML
cdchapman joined the channel
#
saranix emoji is pretty much the opposite of semantics. might as well mark up random entropy. same result.
#
melody could tags be used like for hashtags and mentions? "tag":[
{ "type":"Emoji", "href":"http://emoji.uri/my_custom_emoji.png", "name":":custom_emoji:"}] ?xmpp-social and cdchapman joined the channel
cdchapman joined the channel
cdchapman and howl joined the channel
#
erincandescent <cwebber2> I guess since the xhtml dream died (:teardrop:) adding a machine-readable custom property for an emoji name is unlikely to work <-- <img data-emoji="foo" src="https://../">?
howl, KevinMarks and KevinMarks_ joined the channel
#
saranix csarven: emotionml is very interesting. It seems they were developing it at the exact same time that I developed my ontology. Good news is it seems my info can be encoded using these standard without loss (I think)
#
aaronpk Or you can just do it with webmention ;-) https://indieweb.org/reacji
#
saranix not the same thing
KevinMarks joined the channel
#
saranix reacts
ben_thatmustbeme joined the channel
#
trackbot Error finding '>'. You can review and register nicknames at <http://www.w3.org/Social/track/users>.
dmitriz joined the channel
#
xmpp-social [ajordan] :(
#
xmpp-social [ajordan] csarven: I used to hate emoji because I feel like they don't belong in Unicode but now I'm completely hooked on them so I don't know how to feel :P
#
Gargron oh-oh, i am looking at the implementation report template.md and it has things like "MUST use application/ld+json; profile="blahblah"" for things. mastodon accepts that mime type but i dont think i use it in response headers or request headers, i just use application/activity+json, is that a problem?
cwebber2 joined the channel
#
Gargron cwebber2: hi!
#
Gargron can you hop on mumble for a little bit?
#
erincandescent Gargron, cwebber2: Hmm, the spec doesn't /specifically/ state what content type is to be used for server-to-server requests. It probably should
#
erincandescent I can't see anything saying so in delivery, just that it should POST it
#
erincandescent Content types for requests are only specified in 6. client-to-server interactions
#
xmpp-social [ajordan] Lol, another normative change ?
#
xmpp-social [ajordan] Although I guess we're just clarifying requirements which we've done before
#
xmpp-social [ajordan] Yeah exactly
#
xmpp-social [ajordan] Jinx ;)
cdchapman and KevinMarks joined the channel
#
erincandescent yes
dmitriz, KevinMarks_, KevinMarks and wilkie joined the channel
