#social 2018-06-27
2018-06-27 UTC
infinitywell, xmpp-social and vasilakisfil joined the channel
#
jaywink[m] dansup: totally! though maybe "federated social web" kinda thing
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ac7b/8ac7b6eb035382f883c3f7c77b69df192f7cd62d" alt=""
#
dansup jaywink[m] :)
#
dansup I would like to convince cwebber to organize this. I think it would be great to bring everyone together and discuss various topics.
#
dansup I dont like to travel, so remote would be a great feature to support
vasilakisfil_ and vasilakisfil joined the channel
#
jaywink[m] haha :D
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ac7b/8ac7b6eb035382f883c3f7c77b69df192f7cd62d" alt=""
#
jaywink[m] yeah within Europe is my travel limitation too, mainly for budget reasons. and because travelling to the US would feel scary :|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ac7b/8ac7b6eb035382f883c3f7c77b69df192f7cd62d" alt=""
vasilakisfil_ joined the channel
#
Chocobozzz csarven: yes
#
csarven Chocobozzz: In case you didn't know about https://dev.tube/ , you might want to ping those folks re ActivityPub / PeerTube. That'd be a cool node.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41d6b/41d6bba294de219ba99954b053f64f4069f2871e" alt=""
#
Chocobozzz csarven: they use non creative commons youtube videos, so i don't think it would be feasible to put these videos on a peertube instance :)
timbl, vasilakisfil, sknebel and martijnvdven joined the channel
#
rigelk Chocobozzz, it might still be worth to ping them. of course they wont put the thousand of videos, but some might still
#
nightpool[m] vasilakisfil: did you get federation working? happy to help debug if you're around later today/tomorrow
#
vasilakisfil nightpool[m] nope, the strange thing for me is that I don't get any error in the http body (although if I change something in the signaure I get an error regarding signature)
#
vasilakisfil it would be great if you can help, I ll try to setup an instance today and tomorrow because probably I ll need it soon or later :P
#
Gargron submitted to HN
#
Gargron vasilakisfil: i feel really bad that my tutorial led to a dead end somehow :( mysterious error
#
nightpool[m] vasilakisfil: unfortunately the server I have access to is down right now
#
nightpool[m] and i'm trying to deal wit htaht
#
nightpool[m] *with that
#
nightpool[m] but it does look like a signature error, that's the only thing that can produce a 401. The only thing I can see that's different is the trailing newline on the PEM representation that mastodon produces
#
vasilakisfil Gargron ah really no worries, without that I wouldn't spend that much time :P as I told you such blog posts are super helpful
barnie, bengo and cwebber2 joined the channel
#
bengo wah wah
#
nightpool[m] I'm not available for a meeting today unfortunately :(
#
bengo It seems like this group can/should vote on my PRs here if one of the editors won't https://github.com/w3c/activitystreams/pulls
#
bengo No sweat! Glad you have a nice home and new state. Exciting.
#
bengo That's what dedicated meeting time can be for :)
#
nightpool[m] very funny that me and cwebber apparently can't be in the same state at the same time
#
bengo Those 2 PRs only change two lines. I think defensible. This isn't a normally scheduled meeting time, but for next week I propose voting on whether to merge or close them.
#
bengo kk
#
bengo Other thing that's been on agenda for two weeks now is to "Vote on https://github.com/w3c/activitystreams/wiki/Extension-process"
#
bengo I think what's there to vote on isn't clear enough to be voted on, tbh. I have outlined some concerns here: https://github.com/w3c/activitystreams/issues/479
bengo, cwebber2 and dxtr joined the channel