#social 2018-12-10
2018-12-10 UTC
xmpp-social, tigerfinch, fr33domlover, Cult_ and Cult joined the channel
# Cult i have some question regarding implementation of ActivityPub and what I might have understood.
# Cult I am in a situation with like 3 instances of AP, with followers.
# Cult like, UserA, UserB and UserC, each one of them is on a different instance
# Cult UserA follows UserB, and UserC answer to a note from UserB
# Cult Instance of UserB 'bounce' the message from UserC to the global inbox of the instance of UserA, but the signin in the header is not important anymore, UserA have no garanty of the authenticity of the note from UserC
# Cult The instance needs to request the instance of UserC to confirm that the post exists and get the post from there
# Cult This is normal behaviour ?
# Cult yeah, but this is not the normal use of ActivityPub ?
# Cult I mean, tt seems that mastodon sign the activities (signature.signatureValue) but this is specific to Mastodon ?
tantek joined the channel
# Cult cwebber2: to get compliant with a maximum of instances of the fedunivers, I should validate myself the origin for each incoming request that bounce data
# Cult cwebber2: but still try to use the data signature for those who use it ?
# Cult for maximum efficiency
tantek joined the channel
vasilakisfil_ joined the channel
# Cult cwebber2: yeah, after checking around I came to the same conclusion and i will focus only on supporting the signed ld
# Cult it's a good solution and should be use widely enough
# Cult also, I am working on the Nextcloud+ActivityPub thing :)
Guest84_ joined the channel
# Cult thanks to you for your support !
conner and tantek joined the channel