• #social 2019-05-29
  • Prev
    Next
  • #social
#social ≡
  • ←
  • →
2019-05-29 UTC
# 05:04
jaywink[m]
trwnh (IRC): sure, though I find it difficult to understand how "public" could mean "followers only" so yeah definitely there should be a way for for example mastodon to define this without having to abuse `as:public` - since by no definition of the world can public mean "only a defined list of public". Every definition of "public" in for example https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/public indicates not limited to a group of people but open to an unknown