#social 2019-11-16

2019-11-16 UTC
sl007 joined the channel
#
heluecht[m] > <@jaywink:federator.dev> I kind of think it's OK otherwise but as a receiving server why should I trust it? I'd rather fetch the URL myself, to be sure
#
heluecht[m] Do you see security issues with this?
#
dansup well fetching object urls is a good practise
sl007 joined the channel
#
trwnh heluecht[m]: i'd say use Link instead of Page
sl007 joined the channel
#
jaywink[m] > <@heluecht:feneas.org> Do you see security issues with this?
#
jaywink[m] Not security but trust. Since your delivering content from a third party, I would naturally want to be sure the content is not fabricated but also ensure its up to date.
sl007 and BitBot joined the channel
#
includeals beware that you will have to deactivate TheFreeNetwork module in addition to ActivityPub
#
cwebber2 hi
#
cwebber2 so
#
cwebber2 sl007: think we should do a meeting in 20mins? or is that wayyyy too short notice
#
cwebber2 I could send out an announcement
#
cwebber2 could also do 1 hour 20 mins
#
cwebber2 or we can officially establish one for next saturday, right now.
#
cwebber2 https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=SocialCG+Nov+2019+Telecon&iso=20191123T15&p1=1440&ah=1 or https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=SocialCG+Nov+2019+Telecon&iso=20191123T16&p1=1440&ah=1
#
nightpool[m] it feels a little too short notice to try and have a meeting today
#
cwebber2 nightpool: yeah you're right
#
cwebber2 https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/next-socialcg-meeting-time/237/9?u=cwebber
#
cwebber2 sorry I've done such a shitty job lately :(
#
cwebber2 lots of personal life stuff has happened recently
#
cwebber2 not a good excuse though
#
sl007 cwebber2 - my msg was just a friendly reminder, no worries :) Next Sat is fine for me.
#
nightpool[m] I'm definitely down to help share the load if there's any way to do so cwebber2
sl007 joined the channel
#
sl007 Oh yes, again: I would also want to help if there's any way.
#
cwebber2 https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/2019-11-23-socialcg-meeting/321
sl007 and ilmu joined the channel
#
fr33domlover o/
#
fr33domlover should 'content' always be used when an object has a single rich text field, even when that field isn't the actual essence of the object?
#
fr33domlover For example in git repo merge requests, where the description of the merge request isn't semantically the merge request's content
#
fr33domlover (It's just its description; the real content is the commits)