#social 2022-11-18
2022-11-18 UTC
mro joined the channel
# 
@grifdail ↩️ Basically, mastodon use the activity pub standard to communicate with other server. That standard is not limited to mastodon though, so you can make your own app and it would be able to send and received mastodon toot with no problems. https://www.w3.org/TR/activitypub/ (twitter.com/_/status/1593510759237095426)
mro joined the channel
mro joined the channel
# 
@paulolfod ↩️ Seria possível se todos usassem isso:
https://www.w3.org/TR/activitypub/ (twitter.com/_/status/1593563622613172226)
# 
@lea_linux ↩️ Autre interrogation, est-on obligé d'avoir le frontend web ? Parce que pour le coup, si cela marche à coup de protocole ActivityPub (https://www.w3.org/TR/activitypub/), on peut imaginer un simple serveur daemonisé et un client limite en ligne de commande et on envoie nos messages via CLI (twitter.com/_/status/1593565726975090688)
# 
@sushil_js Mastodon implements the ActivityPub protocol specification described by the W3C here: https://www.w3.org/TR/activitypub/#specification-profiles
Moving a network over to an open protocol is what’s important. The apps built on that protocol will improve with the network effect. Be a bit patient. (twitter.com/_/status/1593574995615170561)
mro, Raito_Bezarius and marinade joined the channel; marinade left the channel
# 
@_immae ↩️ visibility: yes it does (except if it is flagged private. I don’t know if you can privately reply to a public message but I started reading https://www.w3.org/TR/activitypub/ and the protocol at least doesn’t forbid it), but you might not get notified if you’re not in the recipients list (twitter.com/_/status/1593603876904701952)
mro joined the channel
# 
@rmajadas A los devs y tech-lovers de mi TL. Os dejo unos enlaces sobre el Fediverse y Mastodon que ido mirando estos días:
- ActivityPub: https://activitypub.rocks/
- ActivityPub standard: https://www.w3.org/TR/activitypub/
- ActivityStream standard: https://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-core/ (twitter.com/_/status/1593610857522528256)
mro joined the channel
# 
@threaltrebitsch ↩️ Itt van több infó https://www.w3.org/TR/activitypub/ (twitter.com/_/status/1593623101094363137)
mro joined the channel
# 
mro tantek thanks for your reply, I just saw them in the weblog (timezones, sigh).
# mro There seems to be a 'Move' activity that is quite useful but not part of ActivityPub but defined by mastodon unilaterally. Who cares to add such to the standard? Is it the folks on this list? Maybe Gargron can elaborate on the interface.
# 
@gro_tsen ↩️ Also, the beginning of the W3C Recommendation for the ActivityPub protocol is unexpectedly readable and gives some sense of what the protocol is trying to do and how: https://www.w3.org/TR/activitypub/ (but the exact relation btw Mastodon and ActivityPub still escapes me). (twitter.com/_/status/1593659950806581252)
mro and enick_68 joined the channel
# 
@Jorgenbuilder ↩️ Move to an open protocol like https://www.w3.org/TR/activitypub/ (twitter.com/_/status/1593691936552292352)
mro joined the channel
# 
@teilweise ↩️ Implement the ActivityPub-API.
https://www.w3.org/TR/activitypub/ (twitter.com/_/status/1593707506978754565)
mro, tenma, includeals and someonewithpc joined the channel