#wordpress 2018-08-09

2018-08-09 UTC
dougbeal|mb1, funwhilelost, lorimer3, [jgmac1106], [tantek], floogulinc4, Napsterbater11, [dougbeal], Exaeta and [matpacker] joined the channel
#
[matpacker] Which is the best IndieWeb starter theme, my son has asked me to make him a blog so he can document our upcoming holiday.
#
[matpacker] From memory, the Twenty Sixteen IndieWeb theme on Github is the way to go.
asdffdsa, APLU18, apetresc15, davidebeatrici24, tantek, dougbeal|mb1, jackmcbarn241 and ArsenArsen17 joined the channel
#
MarcoZDe pfefferle: My specific use case was this: I receive a webmention via Bridgy, since the tweet accompanying my post got a reply. This get posted back to my blog, and I get a request for moderation. I go into admin, approve, and then want to reply directly. Within admin panel, that will only post a native comment. Would need to check out what this would look like if I replied via the comment form while viewing the
#
MarcoZDe post itself. But eve then, I think a reply to a tweet would only work if it went through Bridgy as well, as gwg said.
[kevinmarks], Quokka21 and [jgmac1106] joined the channel
#
[jgmac1106] yes @marcoZDE that won't accomplish what you want, you need to approve the comment, then clic link to twitter.com, copy the url, do a new reply post, enter the twitter url in the response properties box, and then publish
#
[jgmac1106] If you use Bridgy the twitter thread will stay alive and youe new post will thread as a comment on the original post
#
[jgmac1106] [matpacker], yes SemPress or 2016-IndieWeb, SemPress is inthe wordpress.org repo so it makes updating easier for your son
#
[jgmac1106] I add a page builder to mine, you may want to think about using micro.blog (turn key) or Known (need to install from GitHub)
Numline123, [kevinmarks], tantek, Simba17, Ceber, tantek__ and [pfefferle] joined the channel
#
[pfefferle] GWG MarcoZDE if brid.gy supports webmentions it will work... How webmentions for comments for: you receive a Webmention on one of you blogposts, you answer via the native comment frontend, the Webmention plugin sends a Webmention to the origin of the comment you commented on... and this also works on the other side... see https://notiz.blog/2015/12/07/10-jahre-notizblog/#comment-737676
#
Loqi Matthias Pfefferle
#
sknebel but that's not how bridgy works
fossxplorer8 joined the channel
#
[jgmac1106] [pfefferle] is right though [dougbeal] and @gwg are looking into seeing what it would take for native reply comments to work as syndicated replies as well...while sounds amazing not sure worth the effort,...though I don't use screen reader and don't how hard the current workflow is for our blind friends like @marcozde
tantek__, timvisher9, [kellan], [kevinmarks], jackjamieson, apetresc2, [jgmac1106] and [pfefferle] joined the channel
#
[pfefferle] Sknebel [jgmac1106] but I thought that is how brid.gy publish works...
#
sknebel [pfefferle] I was maybe a bit glib/short: it needs the special link to bridgy and a webmention to it, it doesn't automatically trigger on a reply
#
sknebel so it uses webmentions, but a simple reply without any changes won't have that link to trigger it
#
[pfefferle] If brid.gy would provide a Webmention endpoint for brid.gy comments, it would work
#
[pfefferle] [snarfed] is it possible to combine brid.gy and brid.gy publish like that?
[cleverdevil] and Zombie14 joined the channel
#
[pfefferle] Sknebel [jgmac1106] the Webmention plugin handles every comment like a post, provides a permalinks, and tries to send webmentions to the endpoint, provided by the source url... so it might be only a simple little change in brid.gy ?!?
[eddie], tantek__, [shaners], Maple__15, [tantek] and [jgmac1106] joined the channel
#
[jgmac1106] Loqi needs to just have a bridgy trigger that shares [snarfed]'s post on keep Bridgy publish dumb....but it would be really cool, nock like three steps out of the workflow which has to help folks using screenreaders
#
sknebel the keeping bridgy publish dumb post is about other aspects though
#
sknebel the bigger thing is probably that a post should not be marked as a reply to a bridgy url
jackjamieson, Nightmare24 and [pfefferle] joined the channel
#
[pfefferle] Sknebel for posts yes, but for comments it doesn‘t matter, because it never displays the brid.gy URL
#
sknebel it does matter for anything else consuming the markup
#
sknebel e.g. readers
[grantcodes] joined the channel
#
[pfefferle] It is not shown in the markup
#
[pfefferle] The markup show for example the Twitter url
Raito_Bezarius22, [kiai], AlexZ14, j12t, [quinnvinlove] and thomasb9511 joined the channel
#
thomasb9511 kaniini has invited you to join #litepub
#
Loqi thomasb9511 said: kaniini has invited you to join #litepub
[kiai], [jgmac1106], FrozenFox19, thejoecarroll4, l4z4i, [quinnvinlove], j12t, j12t_, [eddie], [cleverdevil], [dgold] and Chords joined the channel
#
GWG Looking over the discussion
#
GWG This is a two part problem. I think it can work
mub, TheSilentLink0 and [tantek] joined the channel