#[jgmac1106][jackjamieson] it is bad practice because you add properties to the HTML to style your website and not to classes in the HTML containing metadata...plus then designers go and unwillingly delete the microformats since they get trained to remove any unused CSS classes not styling anything
#GWGWe had that issue in discussion, which is why someone wanted to fall back on properties
[tantek], [cleverdevil], [eddie] and [mrkrndvs] joined the channel
#[mrkrndvs]@GWG question about parsing sites, why do some sites parse only the URL or the categories and nothing else? Does this stem from the (poor) themes and is just one of those things? Or should I elaborate in a ticket?
[kevinmarks] and [jgmac1106] joined the channel
#[jgmac1106]@mrkndvs usually a problem with the source, meaning the markup of the site you are parsing is bad. If it is pulling in a category or a tag as the article title that person has a really rough them (WordPress)
[mrkrndvs] joined the channel
#[mrkrndvs]Dumb question Greg, what are the consequences for poor markup?
#ZegnatThe consequences will be that parsers can’t parse, haha. That will quickly run you into a discussion about which parsers you want to target as a site though.
[Rose] joined the channel
#GWGI am happy to look at examples and see if I could improve it, but some sites, as mentioned, have little to go on