#wordpress 2020-03-15
2020-03-15 UTC
bradleyallen, [jgmac1106], alina, gRegorLove, cal, [KevinMarks], [jeremycherfas], [LewisCowles], [Ana_Rodrigues], [Dan_Q], [barryf], [Anna_Dodson], [calumryan], [Murray], [eddie], [suze_shardlow1], TroyDiscord[m] and doubleloop joined the channel
#
doubleloop GWG: I've been playing around with posse'ing to meetup via bridgy, and put a pull request in to syndication links with a meetup provider..
#
doubleloop It all seems to work OK for me but let me know whether it's the right way to go about it or not
chrisaldrich, [Ana_Rodrigues], [chrisaldrich] and [Dan_Q] joined the channel
[calumryan] joined the channel
#
[Dan_Q] It's all very prototypey/experimental, and my goal isn't actually post-kinds-for-Gutenberg (that's just a side-effect) because I've got OTHER Gutenberg-unfriendly plugins too! My goal, though, is to outsource microformats-stuff to my theme and just use post-kinds for the backend interface.
#
[Dan_Q] That said, here's what I've been doing:
#
[Dan_Q] * Writing a Gutenberg meta-widget for selection of post kinds. I first just set 'show_in_rest' and 'hierarchical' to get Category-style "checkboxes" with which to specify the "kind" of a post, but then started working on a "proper" meta box to give me a drop-down. Then I broke it.
#
[Dan_Q] * Started making "blocks" for different functions; the first one I'm looking at is for citing/embedding; the idea being that you can e.g. make a post of kind "reply-to" and then add a "cite" block to it, containing the stuff you're replying "to" as a blockquote (optionally empty, I suppose) and the relevant metadata (right now it's only static; I've not made a form yet because I'm very new to React).
#
[Dan_Q] For many purposes the ultimate solution here would be _harder_ for authors than the current approach, but would allow e.g. replies that cite multiple sources, for example. Webmention still seems to work regardless (it doesn't care).
#
[Dan_Q] I'm going to step back and think about it a bit, and perhaps do a bit more prototyping, but I think there's eventually something workable here.
#
[Dan_Q] I'm going to keep an eye out for upcoming Gutenberg-blocks-related work at my "day job" that I can volunteer myself for, so that I've got an excuse to learn it properly.
#
[Dan_Q] Nor me. It feels somebody like all the worst bits of Javascript and squished them into a single file.
#
[Dan_Q] IMHO, of course. I know many people love it.
#
[Dan_Q] I just love being able to differentiate my different types of content in a meaningful way (while keeping them all fundamentally "posts") in a microformats-friendly way! I'm among the folks who care more about the backend, too.
#
[Dan_Q] I've added three kinds Collection, Comic and Review to my copy.
#
[Dan_Q] (and then I've written a snippet that I use when posting reviews to add the relevant "star rating" microformat)
#
[Dan_Q] ^ that's both a h-entry and a h-review, and includes a p-rating and a h-card (with name, address, lat and long) for the "thing" being reviewed ^
#
[Dan_Q] Ooh, I like that! (autogenerated new UIs)
[carolgilabert] joined the channel
#
[Dan_Q] Me too. Many of my posts are "checkins" used to represent geocaching finds or geohashing adventures.
#
[Dan_Q] No, unfortunately the time I first heard about it I'd already come up with my own metadata schema for locations, and I haven't had the time or energy to think about migration!
#
[Dan_Q] Shows what I know: I didn't know there were standard ones!
[suze_shardlow1] joined the channel
[Anna_Dodson] joined the channel
[snarfed], cal, sknebel, GWG, [dem_cx], [fluffy], [LewisCowles], IWSlackGateway, sebsel, [Cheuk_Cherrie], [jgmac1106], [KevinMarks], [aaronpk], gRegorLove and simons joined the channel
