#wordpress 2024-09-09

2024-09-09 UTC
[manton], to2ds, [schmarty]1, Kodiak and stella joined the channel
#
[snarfed]
hey GWG what's the status on "Bridgy Response" likes in the Wordpress webmention plugin?
#
GWG
[snarfed]: We never figured out a course of action. If there is no summary, it falls back on page title..and the title element is Bridgy Response. We got stalled on the question of what it should say... because if you do Facepile it never shows the text
#
GWG
We probably should have come up with a simple idea until we could. Maybe an emoji. We have one for each type
to2ds and gRegorLove_ joined the channel
#
[snarfed]
GWG is there an open issue in the webmention plugin repo tracking this?
#
GWG
I believe so..Let me find it
#
Loqi
[preview] [dshanske] #438 Bridgy Webmentions Set Content to Bridgy Response
#
GWG
My emoji idea is new
#
[snarfed]
I like it!
#
GWG
Perfection is the enemy of good
#
GWG
[snarfed]: Maybe something in the response would help too though
#
[snarfed]
GWG you mean the mf2 HTML that Bridgy renders?
#
GWG
Yes
#
GWG
A summary element as fallback
#
[snarfed]
I had a special case in there for the WordPress plugin for many years: https://github.com/snarfed/bridgy/issues/516#issuecomment-151517255
#
Loqi
[preview] [snarfed] based on the info above, i have to suspect this is a problem with https://github.com/pfefferle/wordpress-semantic-linkbacks . cc @pfefferle @acegiak @dshanske. in the meantime, i thought of a dumb hack on the bridgy side that should fix this: specia...
#
[snarfed]
I left it in for 5y. the plugin finally improved a bit at one point, so I finally dropped it. https://github.com/snarfed/bridgy/issues/516#issuecomment-804952931
#
Loqi
[preview] [snarfed] @dshanske @pfefferle just fyi I'm undoing the workaround for this "Bridgy Response" webmention display problem in WordPress. it's over 5y old, and we thought something in in pfefferle/wordpress-semantic-linkbacks#39 or pfefferle/wordpress-webmention#...
#
GWG
We rewrote the code for the merge
#
GWG
It no longer renders a sentence because that created language issues
#
GWG
I think we may have missed how many people didn't like the facepile
#
GWG
I originally wanted to have a few preset display options that people could adopt
#
GWG
But design isn't my strongest point
#
gRegor
Bridgy has u-like-of in those responses right? Why not have the plugin translate it to text "liked this"?
#
gRegor
Using i18n of course
#
GWG
gRegor: That's what the old code did.
#
GWG
We were trying to simplify
#
gRegor
Hm, well it's already parsing the mf2
#
GWG
gRegor: That's the issue. It has no summary nor content..so it falls back to html title
#
GWG
Bridgy Response is the page's title tag
#
gRegor
u-like-of is mf2 :)
#
gRegor
And I don't think Bridgy could (easily) do i18n
#
gRegor
For a hypothetical summary
#
GWG
gRegor: Agreed
#
GWG
Same problem.... but converting it into an emoji reaction seems a quick and dirty solution
#
gRegor
i18n in a WordPress plugin is much easier though
#
[snarfed]
I think there's "X liked y" text in e-content in the Bridgy mf2 too. It's just "missing" title
#
GWG
I'm going from memory, may study the problem
[Joe_Crawford], [qubyte], to2ds, [aciccarello], [snarfed]1, [fluffy], [jacky] and [benatwork] joined the channel