#indiewebcamp 2012-04-27

2012-04-27 UTC
davida joined the channel
#
singpolyma To wade very late into the hosting discussion: (1) I've had bad experiences with openvz containers in the past. They're not quite real VMs. (2) 256MB of RAM is plenty for just simple web hosting (I have operated on a bit less successfully as long as the load was small) -- especially if you don't need PHP/Apache and can use something good like Nginx (3) if you want decent hosting with full system access and an admin who is likely to install thin
davida and davida_ joined the channel
#
Loqi [http://twitter.com/t] Thanks @zeldman for having me @bigwebshow @5by5: http://t.co/FCiknqd8 http://t.co/krqPOIB6 #indieweb #browserid #hcard (ttk.me t4Hb1)
brennannovak, davida, singpolyma, bengee, tantek, voxpelli, deusx and spinnerin joined the channel
#
Loqi [http://twitter.com/Indah_lovewanto] @t @zeldman @bigwebshow @5by5 #indieweb #browserid #hcard hayyyyyyyyyy
evanpro joined the channel
#
tantek apparently a judge has decided that Twitter owns your tweets and even your private DMs: http://www.salon.com/2012/04/26/who_owns_your_tweets/singleton/
davida joined the channel
#
mkowens tantek: I would assume they would. Why wouldn't they? It's content that you create on their service, and I would imagine their terms specifically state that the content is "owned" by Twitter to do with it as they please.
#
mkowens Now, I don't think it necessarily *should* be that way.
#
tantek not quite no - Twitter's TOS doesn't claim to "own" the tweets, only that you grant them a license for various kinds of (re)use
#
tantek that's what makes this interesting, the judge is going above and beyond the company's own TOS
#
mkowens Interesting.
#
tantek see also, Flickr TOS
#
tantek *needs URLs*
tilgovi, DrPiD|Away, mkowens and spinnerin_ joined the channel