aaronpkand apparently the posterous founders were working on a new version that they charge $5/mo for from the beginning, and so now there is a shitstorm on HN about it http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5229229
aaronpkhe's extremely disruptive, but only because he's ridiculously loud and goes around asking everyone extremely enthusiastically what they do and where they're from
tantekmaybe document links to previous examples of this person's behavior on the indiewebcamp.com/code-of-conduct-feedback page as something to look out for and consider adding if it becomes a problem?
aaronpkbut there's also the possiblity of someone similar showing up to the event, where they're not being verbally abusive or anything, just completely obnoxious
erinjoAre you looking specifically for examples of inappropriate behavior at events to link to? You could cite something about the guy who made threats against Startup Weekend.
tantekwe're not going to be able to iterate all the way people can be jerks, but we can at least clarify what's ok or not so that people who *think* they're being ok can be more confident of doing so, and people being hurt feel more comfortable/supported speaking up about it.
tantekso one of the reasons I've always pushed explicitly for multiple tracks/rooms at BarCamps is to essentially distract/minimize the ability of any one person to be disruptive. like they have to pick one particular room to go do their thing, and they can't disrupt the whole thing. this is usually frustrating enough to such trolls that they end up leaving of their own accord.
tantekfor this reason it is VERY important to NOT just have a single-track of discussions at a BarCamp like event - it makes it far too vulnerable to one jerk derailing the whole thing.
tantekthe more tracks, the more immune your event is to disruptors. the damage can be contained as it were. and when trolls feel like they can't get much attention, they usually leave.
tantekof course if this was done by a group of individuals, you'd have to be more clever, like talk them into doing a session themselves on "how to troll a barcamp", and thereby self-contain themselves.
tantekaside: whenever these discussions come up, someone inevitably brings up, either seriously, or rhetorically, what about religions/beliefs/cultures etc. that discriminate against gender or sexual orientation etc.
tanteksince we're also supposed to be respecting people's varying religions/beliefs/cultures - what to do when that comes in conflict with respecting gender or sexual orientation etc.
benatkinI wish I hadn't called out one religion. I can see how many very religous people have a lower level of participation at tech events than athiests, agnostics, and less devout religius people
tantekusually if you're unsure about participation by any one group of people or people with a particular attribute, best thing to do is to just talk to someone in said group or with said attribute
benatkinI see. I've thought of the terms hardware and software that way, too. Guess I've drawn an arbitrary line between computers and other things since then...
tommorrisLoqi: !tell tantek am currently on ropey, unreliable internet in hotel in Venice, Italy, but will respond to conference policy stuff at some point.
tommorrisheh. reminds me of my university which blocked port 22 (ssh). but it's a piece of piss to run sshd on port 443, which is the same port as HTTPS
Loqitantek: tommorris left you a message 3 hours, 36 minutes ago: am currently on ropey, unreliable internet in hotel in Venice, Italy, but will respond to conference policy stuff at some point.
Loqitantek: tommorris left you a message 3 hours, 35 minutes ago: also, you might find this quote from Kierkegaard an amusing early take on dogfooding. http://tommorris.org/posts/8094
tommorristantek: Provocations is an edited collection of Kierkegaard's spiritual writings. I'll try and dig out the original quote when I'm not on a shitty connection