#indiewebcamp 2013-02-16

2013-02-16 UTC
#
tantek
posterous is dying?
#
tantek
scrolls up
#
aaronpk
and apparently the posterous founders were working on a new version that they charge $5/mo for from the beginning, and so now there is a shitstorm on HN about it http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5229229
danbri joined the channel
#
aaronparecki.com
edited /why (+22) "/* see also */"
(view diff)
#
tantek
is trying to remember if Posterous going down warning is longer or shorter than Pownce going down warning.
#
tantek
aaronpk - what did you think of http://indiewebcamp.com/code-of-conduct ?
#
tantek
tommorris - interested in particular in your opinion as well
erinjo joined the channel
#
aaronpk
one thing that may be missing, but not sure how to handle it...
#
tantek
can discuss here too of course
#
tantek
didn't mean that to sound dismissive, more of offering one possibility
#
@krynsky
Another example of why I manage my own blog #ownyourdata - Posterous shuttering for good on April 30th http://thenextweb.com/twitter/2013/02/15/the-posterous-rides-away-as-in-shuts-down-april-30t/
#
aaronpk
well there's this guy making the rounds at a bunch of tech events in portland
#
aaronpk
he's extremely disruptive, but only because he's ridiculously loud and goes around asking everyone extremely enthusiastically what they do and where they're from
#
tantek
ah, that problem
#
aaronpk
he has already been kicked out of one or two bars by the bartenders during events
#
aaronpk
i haven't seen him get agressive yet, but I did hear one case of it
#
tantek
so, to be blunt, is he drunk at the time? we had an instance of that happen at BarCamp and I had to deal with it personally
#
aaronpk
I'm not sure, I think one time hey was high on something, but didn't confirm
#
tantek
so, for now I'm guessing the person you describe does not have the wherewithal to actually setup an indie domain / site and sign-up.
#
aaronpk
no not so much
#
aaronpk
but that may not stop him from showing up
#
tantek
um, that's different. if you're not signed up as a participant, and you're not an apprentice, then you don't get to attend.
#
tantek
as organizers, we have to make sure the door volunteers understand that.
#
tantek
maybe document links to previous examples of this person's behavior on the indiewebcamp.com/code-of-conduct-feedback page as something to look out for and consider adding if it becomes a problem?
#
tantek
or is this all word of mouth?
#
aaronpk
all word of mouth so far
#
tantek
ok, then link to this log for now ;)
#
aaronpk
first online documentation of it probably :)
#
aaronpk
so i'm a little worried about him specifically showing up, but as long as we turn him away at the door it will be fine
#
aaronpk
but there's also the possiblity of someone similar showing up to the event, where they're not being verbally abusive or anything, just completely obnoxious
#
erinjo
Are you looking specifically for examples of inappropriate behavior at events to link to? You could cite something about the guy who made threats against Startup Weekend.
#
aaronpk
oh yea that too
#
tantek
I trust us as organizers to handle that on a case by case basis. We almost had that at the first IndieWebcamp and I think we handled it
#
aaronpk
portland's getting bigger
#
tantek
the "completely obnoxious" problem
#
aaronpk
not something needed to be documented in a code of conduct somehow?
#
tantek
so far that kind of behavior specifically has been handled fairly well case-by-case at BarCamps
#
tantek
(warning/stopping and/or kicking out)
#
tantek
and usually it tends to be a general sort of misbehavior - not directed at any one person or any one type of person
#
tantek
it's the latter that has shown a need of explicit documentation / explanation
#
aaronpk
ah good point
#
aaronpk
that's a good distinction
#
tantek
we're not going to be able to iterate all the way people can be jerks, but we can at least clarify what's ok or not so that people who *think* they're being ok can be more confident of doing so, and people being hurt feel more comfortable/supported speaking up about it.
#
tantek
so one of the reasons I've always pushed explicitly for multiple tracks/rooms at BarCamps is to essentially distract/minimize the ability of any one person to be disruptive. like they have to pick one particular room to go do their thing, and they can't disrupt the whole thing. this is usually frustrating enough to such trolls that they end up leaving of their own accord.
#
tantek
for this reason it is VERY important to NOT just have a single-track of discussions at a BarCamp like event - it makes it far too vulnerable to one jerk derailing the whole thing.
morrocco_mole joined the channel
#
tantek
the more tracks, the more immune your event is to disruptors. the damage can be contained as it were. and when trolls feel like they can't get much attention, they usually leave.
#
tantek
of course if this was done by a group of individuals, you'd have to be more clever, like talk them into doing a session themselves on "how to troll a barcamp", and thereby self-contain themselves.
#
tantek
they might even document it on the wiki
#
@benatkin
@jenn nice #indieweb tweet :-)
#
aaronpk
wow that's quite the .com http://jenn.com/
hober, zztr, scor and Stevef_ joined the channel
tantek joined the channel
#
@benatkin
RT @t: drafted @IndieWebCamp code of conduct: http://indiewebcamp.com/code-of-conduct input and feedback welcome. #respect #speakingup (ttk.me t4NW1)
#
benatkin
I like the Code of Conduct draft
#
@benatkin
RT @krynsky: Another example of why I manage my own blog #ownyourdata - Posterous shuttering for good on April 30th http://thenextweb.com/twitter/2013/02/15/the-posterous-rides-away-as-in-shuts-down-april-30t/
#
@benatkin
#ownyourdata
#
@barrow_me
@loveofmysterySF @violetblue self hosting: it's not just for breakfast anymore. #ownyourdata
#
benatkin
for that obnoxious person, the first thing you said, aaronpk is that he asks too many questions
#
benatkin
well, you didn't put it that way, but you said he goes around asking people things
#
tantek
thanks benatkin
#
tantek
benatkin - "too many questions" can be a form of Denial of Service attack
#
benatkin
what about saying to respect people's privacy, by not asking questions
#
benatkin
hah, I was thinking along those lines :)
#
benatkin
ok, didn't complete that thought
#
benatkin
not asking questions in that way
#
benatkin
but what is *that way*?
#
tantek
benatkin - there are many such *that way*s
#
tantek
harrasment in general. unwelcome attention.
#
tantek
though the problems of last week were about more fundamental kinds of disrespect
#
benatkin
yes, unwelcome attention and disrespect. not respecting their privacy, or their time, or their wishes
#
tantek
aside: whenever these discussions come up, someone inevitably brings up, either seriously, or rhetorically, what about religions/beliefs/cultures etc. that discriminate against gender or sexual orientation etc.
#
tantek
since we're also supposed to be respecting people's varying religions/beliefs/cultures - what to do when that comes in conflict with respecting gender or sexual orientation etc.
#
tantek
and I think I have a hypothesis (a principle) to handle this - would like some feedback (before tweeting etc.)
#
benatkin
ok I won't tweet it :)
#
tantek
so here goes: software (culture, creed) MUST NOT disrespect hardware (gender, sexual orientation, age, disability, race). #RFC2119
#
tantek
can you think of any counter-examples?
#
tantek
is working on crafting an anti-harrasment namshub
#
benatkin
no, except that Islam divides liberals and libertarians on this
#
benatkin
oops I guess I just revealed that I'm the wrong person to ask
#
benatkin
well, some groups are of the opinion that sexual orientation is not hardware
#
tantek
benatkin, science trumps opinion there.
#
benatkin
the first thing I thought of when I read that is that Richard Dawkins would agree with you, and he's a polarizing figure
#
benatkin
perhaps too polarizing for indiewebcamp
#
tantek
I'm making a polarizing (MUST NOT) statement.
#
benatkin
I see. Yes, that's less problamatic.
#
tantek
well I'm starting with a personal statement
#
tantek
and seeing how that goes
#
tantek
I'm predicting that all this code of conduct stuff may hit some point where we have to draw lines / priorities when things come into conflict
#
tantek
(as any philosopher should)
#
tantek
(would)
#
benatkin
I wish I hadn't called out one religion. I can see how many very religous people have a lower level of participation at tech events than athiests, agnostics, and less devout religius people
#
benatkin
and I think that explains part of the lack of diversity in other areas. It's a hard problem.
#
benatkin
letting software disrespect hardware drives out people, and so does adamantly stopping it
#
tantek
usually if you're unsure about participation by any one group of people or people with a particular attribute, best thing to do is to just talk to someone in said group or with said attribute
#
tantek
and get their opinion / point of view
#
tantek
you don't have to agree, but at least you can attempt to understand each other, which is an important forward step.
#
benatkin
I grew up religious. I might have avoided a tech event that had swearing at some point, but it would have been due to piety rather than faith.
#
benatkin
It would be different with people in my family that fit into it better.
#
benatkin
I think you have to ask them, but I also think it would be hard to understand them.
tantek_ joined the channel
#
benatkin
the policy doesn't seem too different from PyCon's except for "Excessive swearing and offensive jokes are not appropriate for PyCon."
#
tantek
so offensive jokes are already covered by the respect/disrespect clauses
#
benatkin
I think that's a big deal. I dislike it, but I think it might be effective.
#
tantek
wait what do you dislike? and what's a "big deal"?
#
tantek
just making sure I understand
#
benatkin
well, I see "excessive swearing" as reducible to "swearing"
#
benatkin
well, gtg. I like your hardware/software analogy, it's grown on me.
tantek joined the channel
#
benatkin
I think it's good to leave swearing out of the universal one, since "excessive swearing" will often be interpreted as just "swearing"
#
tantek
Agreed
#
tantek
I'm not sure it's an analogy.
#
benatkin
the people running the event and the speakers will set the tone
#
tantek
I think it's quite literal
#
benatkin
and if they really want people to not have to worry about naughty words, they can add it to a customized version of it
#
tantek
I think we can worry about the naughty words problem if it actually becomes a problem.
#
benatkin
I see. I've thought of the terms hardware and software that way, too. Guess I've drawn an arbitrary line between computers and other things since then...
#
benatkin
yes...it's a problem at many events, depending on who you ask, but not at the last IndieWebCamp
#
tantek
I think I first saw that hardware/software metaphor in Snowcrash
#
@haxor
No. The most durable blogging platform ever created is your own node on the open web. #indieweb
#
@cstanhope
RT @haxor: No. The most durable blogging platform ever created is your own node on the open web. #indieweb
#
@kevinbeynon
RT @haxor: No. The most durable blogging platform ever created is your own node on the open web. #indieweb
danbri, tantek, eschnou, danbri_ and Stevef joined the channel
#
Stevef
tantek:adactio: grep of 35000 home pages form top 50,000 sites usage of <cite> element http://www.html5accessibility.com/HTML5data/cite.html - raw data http://webdevdata.org
#
Stevef
warning 5mb html page
eschnou joined the channel
#
Stevef
grep of 35000 home pages form top 50,000 sites usage of <cite> element http://www.html5accessibility.com/HTML5data/cite.html (warning 5mb html page) - raw data http://webdevdata.org
#
@aaaq2223
RT @t: drafting an @IndieWebCamp Code of Conduct. Step 1, research: http://indiewebcamp.com/code-of-conduct-examples (re: #SpeakingUp and taking action). (ttk.me t4NT4)
danbri and eschnou joined the channel
#
tommorris
on the matter of dogfooding, http://tommorris.org/posts/8094
scor, samobk and eschnou joined the channel
#
@Case
RT @haxor: No. The most durable blogging platform ever created is your own node on the open web. #indieweb
#
@benatkin
RT @haxor: No. The most durable blogging platform ever created is your own node on the open web. #indieweb
#
@mattb_stellar
RT @haxor: No. The most durable blogging platform ever created is your own node on the open web. #indieweb
Stevef joined the channel
#
tommorris
Loqi: !tell tantek am currently on ropey, unreliable internet in hotel in Venice, Italy, but will respond to conference policy stuff at some point.
#
tommorris
!tell tantek am currently on ropey, unreliable internet in hotel in Venice, Italy, but will respond to conference policy stuff at some point.
#
Loqi
Ok, I'll tell him that when I see him next
#
tommorris
!tell tantek also, you might find this quote from Kierkegaard an amusing early take on dogfooding. http://tommorris.org/posts/8094
#
Loqi
Ok, I'll tell him that when I see him next
barnabywalters joined the channel
#
tommorris
greetings from Venezia, barnabywalters
#
barnabywalters
greetings tommorris! What are you up to in Venie?
#
tommorris
sightseeing with family
#
tommorris
and, well, mapping. ;)
#
barnabywalters
of course :)
#
barnabywalters
are you doing some international indieweb check-in testing too?
#
tommorris
unlikely. the wifi in the hotel is sub-par and 3G is expensive
#
tommorris
to browse the web, I'm having to use SSH tunnelling back to my VPS in the US
#
barnabywalters
I stayed in a german hotel once where they allowed passwordless logins to the network, but blocked port 80 unless you paid
#
barnabywalters
they hadn’t blocked *any* other ports, so I could do mail, IRC and https browsing for free!
#
barnabywalters
and accessed http content via a https proxy :)
#
tommorris
heh. reminds me of my university which blocked port 22 (ssh). but it's a piece of piss to run sshd on port 443, which is the same port as HTTPS
#
tommorris
and most people can't tell the difference between HTTPS traffic and SSH traffic given that both are encrypted
zztr joined the channel
#
@brennannovak
@doingitwrong it does solve the issue of keeping ones server online, but you should checkout @indiewebcamp
erinjo joined the channel
eschnou, sbp, barnabywalters_, barnabywalters and tantek joined the channel
#
Loqi
tantek: tommorris left you a message 3 hours, 36 minutes ago: am currently on ropey, unreliable internet in hotel in Venice, Italy, but will respond to conference policy stuff at some point.
#
Loqi
tantek: tommorris left you a message 3 hours, 35 minutes ago: also, you might find this quote from Kierkegaard an amusing early take on dogfooding. http://tommorris.org/posts/8094
#
tantek
tommorris, that's a great quote!
#
tantek
worth getting it repeated in the channel: http://tommorris.org/posts/8094
#
tantek
Hmm… Loqi doesn't appear to be quoting URL titles in the channel any more
#
tantek
cc: aaronpk
#
tantek
"Metaphorically speaking, a person's ideas must be the building he lives in - otherwise there is something terribly wrong." - Søren Kierkegaard
#
aaronpk
is that useful? some people were getting annoyed by it in other channels
#
tantek
I though it was useful
#
aaronpk
better idea: look for an h-entry and use that!
#
tantek
heh - how many channels is Loqi in?
#
aaronpk
a few :)
#
aaronpk
the noisiest channel is #pdxtech where he gets pushed to his limits
#
tantek
it's funny, we don't have an #sftech channel equivalent
#
tantek
I wonder what in PDX tech culture encourages such a convergence.
#
tommorris
tantek: thouhg you'd enjoy that
#
tantek.com
edited /selfdogfood (+255) "add Kierkegaard quote"
(view diff)
#
tommorris
tantek: Provocations is an edited collection of Kierkegaard's spiritual writings. I'll try and dig out the original quote when I'm not on a shitty connection
#
tantek
sounds good
#
tommorris
or the original source rather
mxuribe, mxuribe1, erinjo and scor joined the channel