pdurbintommorris: I am curious to hear more about wikipedia as a silo, though. you make it sound like a bad thing. do you have a vision for something like wikipedia that isn't a silo? I get a lot of value out of wikipedia already. it seems to work well enough
tommorrispdurbin: "wikipedia as a silo" - I don't think that's a bad thing, but it is a centralised place. attempts at building decentralised wikipedias (or indeed competitors) have failed
tommorrissame with OpenStreetMap and other services - all can be used to augment indieweb (say, by using OSM as a location DB, which I do) but they are silos
pdurbinyea, I feel ok from an "own your data" perspective contributing to sites such as wikipedia or stackoverflow since they make the data available. stackoverflow even has a nice API from which you can download all your questions, answers, and comments.
pdurbinover and over Jeff Atwood has said he wanted StackOverflow to make the internet better. in general, I think he's achieved this. so I'd call his efforts better than neutral :)
tantektommorris, pdurbin, I'm not sure I'd call everything centralized a "silo". Silo to me implies some amount of wall, restrictive TOS, or other weird proprietariness/corporateness.
tantekshared community spaces where some corporate entity isn't claiming ownership of your work, and there is very low (little/no) effort involved in moving your data in/out.
tantekanother "test" of silo-ness, can someone freely create a mirror, and if the original shuts down, have the mirror effectively replace the original from a community perspective? with silos I'd say no. with commons I'd say yes.
benwerdOut of interest, is anyone *reading* webfinger in anger, and if so, are you looking for specific information? (I'm aware of the conversation about it not necessarily being useful in the Indieweb context)
benwerdI'll clarify: is anyone, in their production software, reading information from another system's webfinger URLs / files, and if so, are you looking for certain properties in particular?
EHLOVaderBut for the end users, I don't quite understand the benefits, or why typing in a domain name, besides hosting a page there with the relMe links, would be any simpler than buttons that provide the user a one click choice of provider to authenticate through, via oAuth. Like this http://i.imgur.com/e3t19lt.png
tantekEHLOVader "buttons that provide the user a one click choice of provider" are "simpler" for the user in the same way that fascism or totalitarianism is simpler for the end user.
tantekexplicitly providing a text input provides a much more level playing field for users to choose an identity among large or small silos or their own domain