#indiewebcamp 2013-09-28

2013-09-28 UTC
vrypan_, beerslammer and tantek joined the channel
#
tantek
catches up on the logs
#
tantek
vyrpan - great post and well done!
tantek and benwerd joined the channel
#
shaners
is anyone using hMedia / h-media for photos/videos/audios?
#
shaners
is anyone using hMedia / h-media for photos/videos/audios?
#
@bethelightwrite
Did you all see today's #CoverReveal? If not, take a look! http://andreagoodson.wordpress.com/ #rt #share #indieauth #NA #romanticsuspense
(twitter.com/_/status/383774649416290304)
singpolyma joined the channel
#
@danamason06
RT @bethelightwrite: Did you all see today's #CoverReveal? If not, take a look! http://andreagoodson.wordpress.com/ #rt #share #indieauth #NA #romantics…
(twitter.com/_/status/383775130331410432)
#
@CedrickMay
RT @mcburton: .@captain_primate's arguments for open scholarship remind me of the #indieweb movement http://indiewebcamp.com/principles #detroitdh
(twitter.com/_/status/383786944536125440)
wardn_, jernst_, barneybook|2, josephboyle1, lukecyca_, tilgovi, jschweinsberg, jgraham909, tpinto, tantek, adactio, hadleybeeman_, rknLA, benwerd, LauraJ, gjones, singpolyma and squeakytoy joined the channel
#
@xtof_fr
@EXCPU Merci. #OpenKitchen ouvert : quelques pbs soulevés par #indieweb sur le protocole #webfinger. #RSVP http://christopheducamp.com/w/2013-271
(twitter.com/_/status/383868358216527872)
eschnou, melvster, singpolyma, tpinto, LauraJ, andreypopp, barneybook, peat, acegiak, vincent, jschweinsberg, wardn_, bnvk and squeakytoy joined the channel
#
vrypan
Thanks, tantek.
barneybook, vincent and josephboyle joined the channel
#
@voxpelli
@bolstad Samma här, tycker dock @indiewebcamp ser mer lovande ut – lite av en andra generationens decentraliseringsvÃ¥g som fÃ¥tt bra moment
(twitter.com/_/status/383954634139643905)
#
squeakytoy
thats swedish :<
#
@voxpelli
@bolstad Kolla exempelvis in http://indiewebcamp.com/webmention – kommer fixa in det pÃ¥ min blogg ganska snart (har en Disqus-liknande lösning pÃ¥ gÃ¥ng)
(twitter.com/_/status/383954962146807808)
tpinto joined the channel
#
squeakytoy
I have just finished writing the first version of the squiso manifesto (squiso is a project i am working on to create a more en social web) https://sites.google.com/a/squiso.com/opensquiso-wiki/the-squiso-manifesto <-- It is a first version, but what do you guys think? Does it make sense? Any feedback would be appreciated :-)
tantek joined the channel
#
bret
squeakytoy ill check it out
benwerd joined the channel
#
tantek
greetings from Science Hack Day!
#
Loqi
giggles
spinnerin joined the channel
#
squeakytoy
I just had a skype meeting with a mentor, brainstorm-mentor, about an idea i have, and I kinda feel shot down afterwards.
singpolyma, LauraJ, jmsmcfrlnd, shaners, jernst_ and caseorganic joined the channel
#
bret
squeakytoy, I read over the squisio manifesto
#
squeakytoy
bret, oh, really? wow ok
#
squeakytoy
bret, be honest and direct
#
bret
they sound like good goals, and that there is a lot of overlap with http://indiewebcamp.com/principles
#
bret
it is still just a manifesto though, which is fairly abstract, so I'm still somewhat confused, but let me know if I have this straight
#
bret
have you decided upon any existing standards for data exchange?
singpolyma joined the channel
#
bret
also, how do you plan to make this useful to people when everyone still uses facebook and twitter currently, aka the monocoulture pitfal http://indiewebcamp.com/monoculture
#
squeakytoy
bret, existing standards, such as?
#
bret
depends on what you are wanting to do, a number of us have been experimenting with microformats and semantic htmk data, but there are all sorts of existing social data exchange formats such as activity streams, json-ld etc
#
bret
html*
#
squeakytoy
i know that indiewebcamp is all about microformats, and thats great. My project isn't at that stage yet, where it can be integrated.
#
squeakytoy
I know my project is hugly confusing, and I am working hard to shed some light on it, making it more clear
#
squeakytoy
bret, currently, data is passed around as json.
#
bret
have you using existing json vocabulary
#
bret
have you considered using an existing json vocab standard?
#
squeakytoy
bret, concerning the monoculture, my project can't develop that problem, its impossible. The project defines a "common language", all you need to do, is follow the same standards, and you and me can create a network
#
squeakytoy
bret, mm, not really
#
bret
that is the monoculture, aka all you have to do is x
#
bret
monoculture issue
#
squeakytoy
well, you can't create a network if no one does the same thing
#
squeakytoy
thats technically impossible
#
bret
which is also part of something that the microfomats approach to data exchange struggles with to some degree
#
squeakytoy
i just think squiso is a really cool idea
#
squeakytoy
but i am currently doing a lousy job explaining it, i think
#
bret
projects like falcon started not with a separate network, but with the goal of owning ones identity online, and thus posting original content to their own site, and posting copies to silos, creating immediate value for people running it
#
squeakytoy
that sounds like a monoculture
#
bret
im not sure what you mean
#
squeakytoy
how did it post to your own site?
#
bret
its an approach to breaking wayay from the existing networks
#
Loqi
woot
#
bret
away*
#
squeakytoy
i misunderstood, sorry :-)
#
bret
diaspora is an awsome project, but its common to hear that it 'failed'
#
bret
it was its own separate network, and thus, people were not switching
#
squeakytoy
diaspora is a monoculture, right?
#
squeakytoy
yupp yupp
#
bret
that would be an example yes, I think
#
squeakytoy
i spoke with simon t found of buddycloud last week as well
#
squeakytoy
he is my "mozilla mentor" - ish, he gave me great input tho
#
squeakytoy
its cool, creating a new distributed social network, but.. why?
#
squeakytoy
its just a new system
#
squeakytoy
thats why i enjoy my project more
#
squeakytoy
but its a personal graal now
#
bret
i would start with something that is of fairly immediate value to yourself
#
bret
because if you can't manage that, how is it going to be of value to others, you know?
#
squeakytoy
yupp yupp
#
squeakytoy
there is a famous phrase about that :-)
#
squeakytoy
but i cant remember it now
#
bret
if that is something you care about of course ;)
#
squeakytoy
to make a product, where you use it yourself
#
bret
squeakytoy. when assessing standards, a good way to assess the value of it is to see if the authors use it themselves
#
squeakytoy
yupp yupp :-)
#
squeakytoy
found you online as well
#
squeakytoy
.io domain is cool
caseorganic and singpolyma joined the channel
#
bret
my humble attempts at indieweb :)
caseorganic, singpolyma, vrypan, wardn_ and spinnerin joined the channel
#
vrypan
Has anyone worked on the scalability of indieweb proposals? I mean, hosting one's own social stream, etc is nice but maintaing the infrastructure and being able to serve thousands of requests per second whenever your ideas or thoughts get slashdotted (not sure of the modern equivalent ) is not trivial...
#
aaronpk
serving thousands of requests per second of static html is nearly trivial
#
aaronpk
but yea not everyone has a static html site
#
vrypan
aaronpk I totally agree!
#
vrypan
I was getting to it. I put some thought on how I've set up my presence (not the perfect indieweb example, but kind of good), and I think there is an architecture that could help: http://blog.vrypan.net/2013/09/28/dli-distribution-logic-interfaces/
#
vrypan
I'd really appreciate any thoughts on it.
#
aaronpk
cool, can't read right now
#
vrypan
It's actually about keeping ownership of the things that matter (logic, content) and outsourcing the things that should scale (distribution and interfaces).
#
aaronpk
cool, that's something I've been thinking about a lot too
#
aaronpk
that's also the thinking behind PubSubHubbub
#
aaronpk
feel free to add some more details abotu that here as well: http://indiewebcamp.com/business-models
tantek, andreypopp, friedcell and caseorganic joined the channel
#
tantek
squeakytoy - you're looking for http://indiewebcamp.com/selfdogfood
#
tantek
aaronpk, vyrpan, yes, serving thousands of requests per second of static html is trivial with today's servers / hosts / virtual hosts
#
tantek
if you can do it with one php script and one flat storage file access, that's also trivial (with today's servers)
#
tantek
(that's what I'm doing with falcon for viewing any permalink. executes one php file, falcon.php, which determines algorithmically from the permalink which flat storage file to read, and then generates the permalink page accordingly)
#
tantek
(zero database accesses)
#
tantek
squeakytoy - also regarding monoculture - I'm not sure you understand how easily it is to fall into it.
#
tantek
you claim your project can't develop that problem, and yet, you start with the assumption that "all you need to do, is follow" the new "common language" that your "project defines". that sounds like a new monoculture.
#
tantek
you should instead make *your project* follow the common languages of existing efforts
#
tantek
also regarding: "I know my project is hugly confusing, and I am working hard to shed some light on it, making it more clear" - the answer to that is selfdogfooding
#
tantek
selfdogfood by building and deploying bits of your project on your own domain, and then talk about those bits
#
tantek
if you haven't built it nor deployed it, then advocating it makes little to no sense.
#
vrypan
tantek Ideally, I'd like to be able to serve my entire on-line presence from a computer at home: own the whole thing from iron to bits :-) Practically, this is not impossible, but it really hard for most people. That's why I tried to split the components. That's what the "DLI" is about.
#
tantek
vrypan - the potential future is to edit/serve your entire online presence from a device in your pocket as well, which asynchronously synchronizes with a static cache "in the cloud" (e.g. akamai) whenever it gets connectivity.
#
vrypan
I totally agree. "Naming" the components, makes it easier to think about them and letting other people know how a proposed solution fits in their architecture. I'm not saying DLI is the right way to think about it, but if it were, it would make my life much easier if I one that service X is a "distribution component" or that mycrazyservice.io is an "input interface".
shaners joined the channel
#
bret
aaronpk, I think i hosed this PR, but https://github.com/converspace/webmention/pull/26 now has a working webmention site via jekyll
#
bret
it turned into a slightly larger project
bnvk and tantek joined the channel
#
bret
!tell barnabywalters If you have time, would you check out https://github.com/converspace/webmention/pull/26 and see what you think?
#
Loqi
Ok, I'll tell him that when I see him next
barneybook|2 joined the channel
#
bret
crap, when did we change from rel="http://webmention.org/" to rel="webmention"
caseorganic and bnvk joined the channel
shaners, jernst_ and bnvk joined the channel
squeakytoy2, acegiak, shaners and singpolyma joined the channel