2014-04-10 UTC
# 00:01 GWG I'm getting into the h-card stuff next
# 00:01 GWG Although links are still annoying me
# 00:01 GWG I started playing with custom Wordpress fields.
# 00:04 snarfed gRegor`: yeah. i think the biggest initial question is whether to make a separate query endpoint standard, or to extend webmention to support syndicated target urls
# 00:06 snarfed to send a backfeed webmention, you need to know the original post's target url, so you need some way to get it from the silo post
# 00:06 GWG Why can't the source tell Bridgy about things it sent?
# 00:07 GWG "Hey Bridgy, I just sent this source to FB, Twitter, G+...."
# 00:08 snarfed GWG: definitely worth mentioning that alternative on the issue, feel free to add it!
# 00:08 snarfed KartikPrabhu: good point! maybe we'd allow it if the silo account and source domain had rel-me links
# 00:09 snarfed lots of stuff like this that still needs thinking through
# 00:09 gRegor` I don't think FB has rel-me links, though
# 00:09 KartikPrabhu snarfed: so you would need both the original url and a syndication-url to match up
# 00:10 snarfed gRegor`: no, but you can interpret the links in the "web site" field as being rel-me
# 00:11 snarfed KartikPrabhu: you need that matching to connect the individual post, and then you need the rel-me links (or whatever) to prove that the silo account is the same as the domain
KevinMarks joined the channel
# 00:18 snarfed gRegor`: i see the bridgy bug on case sensitive checking for domain names. nice find! i'll file an issue
# 00:18 gRegor` I was just about to tell you.
# 00:18 gRegor` You mind reader!
leadballhummingb joined the channel
# 00:21 GWG Bridgy does it now with Facebook. If Facebook doesn't have Rel=me, how do we justify it now?
eschnou joined the channel
# 00:26 GWG Bridgy is verifying webmentions based on the link in the Facebook post, correct? But, if there was no link...there would be no verification, that is the concern?
netweb joined the channel
# 00:27 kylewm not just verifying, that's how it actually knows who too send the mentions to. No notion of "account owner" built in
# 00:28 snarfed kind of, but not exactly. bridgy doesn't do any verification at all, at least on the "listen" side. it tries to send webmentions for all responses to all original post links it discovers.
# 00:29 tantek there's a website field in your facebook profile that Bridgy could use as well - as a one-off custom rel-me
# 00:29 snarfed bridgy does extract that and use it for publishing, but not for backfeed.
# 00:31 kbs snarfed, tantek - missed that discussion - what field is this?
# 00:32 snarfed (btw, careful parsing it, people often put multiple whitespace- or newline-separated urls)
# 00:34 kbs (and look forward to seeing y'all again at sfmozilla, off to the BART :)
# 00:38 GWG So, bridgy knows My Site and My Facebook Profile are the same due to linking.
# 00:39 GWG Shouldn't it trust that any identical content on one should be linked to the same content on the other?
# 00:39 snarfed GWG: for the publish side, yes. for backfeed, it doesn't currently care
# 00:39 GWG But to create backfeed without a link..
# 00:39 snarfed GWG: not necessarily. not everyone uses rel-syndication links
# 00:40 snarfed but yes, one way to implement this is to require rel-syndication links, and then to build a db of connected pages as they're posted, e.g. with PuSH or custom ping protocol or whatever
KevinMarks joined the channel
# 00:41 snarfed sorry, to answer your specific point, yes, to support this, the backfeed side would need to pay attention to "linked" accounts.
# 00:41 kylewm and that seems way harder than adding a new rel endpoint for looking up originals from the syndicated url
# 00:44 kylewm absolutely kartikprabhu. can't remember where I got it but it was reasonably free of copyright
# 00:44 GWG snarfed: I have a plugin for notifying silos of content...why can't I notify Bridgy, as I asked earlier.
ttepasse joined the channel
# 00:45 snarfed that's what i meant just now. it's definitely doable. we could add that support to bridgy.
# 00:45 snarfed we're not yet sure if it's the best approach, but it is one option
# 00:48 kylewm can you just add new rel types? like I'm sure it's possible but is it a bad idea?
# 00:50 kylewm I wonder if any of you are on the same bart rain as I am :-)
tantek joined the channel
# 00:51 snarfed kylewm: as long as they don't conflict, sure! why not. and add them to "experimental" section(s) on microformats.org
# 00:53 kylewm naming is hard. original-query syndication-lookup ... not sure
# 00:54 tantek starting with your use-case - what are you trying to do (presumably with a new rel value) ?
# 00:57 tantek hey dietrich - I'll be in the MozSF room soon to try to figure out setup
# 00:59 bret aaronpk: ill try to come to hwc tonight actually, but I might be a bit late
# 00:59 bret has anyone played with responsive images yet? just landed in chrome
ttepasse joined the channel
hugoroyd_ joined the channel
benward_ joined the channel
heathjs, tommorris_ and jacus_ joined the channel
tantek and pavelz_ joined the channel
reidab and nfn joined the channel
# 01:24 kylewm kbs and I are at the door on embarcadero side
# 01:25 bret dietrich: ill be there late, maybe like 7
kylewm_ joined the channel
# 01:30 dietrich ben_thatmustbeme: the mozilla video conferencing stuff is offline
pauloppenheim and demis joined the channel
# 01:34 tantek dietrich - having network issues on my hangouts machine
# 01:37 aaronpk Ok next time we're using talky and my logitech camera we used at IWCSF
kbs and pauloppenheim joined the channel
# 01:47 tantek Evan: there's a comment somewhere about running SSL in a separate process from the webserver
# 01:48 tantek evan: been working on a feedreader but curious what to do, what's the state of the art?
# 01:49 tantek brad: interested in Camlistore - works on it with Boodman
# 01:49 tantek ryan: is it like a personal cloud that backs up to other users?
j12t joined the channel
fmarier joined the channel
# 01:51 tantek … learning how to technically translate things I do
# 01:51 tantek … in order to not rely on technical interpretations
aboodman joined the channel
# 01:52 tantek tantek: data ownership has high overlap with medical services
# 01:52 tantek darius: got a couple of projects. dunlaps.net
# 01:53 tantek … was just in the process to move some of this stuff onto a non-profit site called the squarepeg foundation
# 01:54 tantek … a long list of products I used going away or changing their UI
# 01:54 tantek … product kept changing in ways I didn't like
# 01:55 tantek … product kept changing in ways I didn't like
# 01:55 tantek … my needs are different than the incentives of the people developing these products
# 01:55 tantek … original developers are not incentivized to keep working on it that way
# 01:56 aaronpk It's a dark and stormy, and she cannot type right now :-)
# 01:57 tantek … things I'm thinking of working on are for more mainstream people
# 01:57 tantek … not my itch personally, and wouldn't use them
# 01:57 tantek … but when we get to working on things for more mainstream people
# 01:58 tantek … how do we reconcile those with scratch your own itch, selfdogfood
# 02:00 tantek … news: finally decided to put the stake in the ground and get IndieBox crowd funded
# 02:01 tantek … has been running IndieBox himself for his family since 2013-12-25
# 02:04 tantek … hardware because wants a place where the apps actually run
# 02:04 tantek … without complexity of hosting account, SSL, etc.
chloeweil joined the channel
# 02:10 tantek hey portland can you take notes for folks there
# 02:11 tantek PaulOppenheim.com - interested in private messaging
# 02:12 tantek Kylewm.com - reached stopping point on his site
# 02:12 tantek … wants to make it easy for other people to do it
# 02:13 tantek … at some point would like to build a sandstorm app
# 02:13 tantek … right now spends on all time on company website
# 02:14 tantek … personal website was … in o doctors .com (sp?)
dybskiy and KartikPrabhu joined the channel
# 02:22 KartikPrabhu bret: I have responsive images on my site but I use custom javascript to do it. Don't like the picture element
ben_thatmustbeme, npdoty, paulcp and scor joined the channel
etymancer, gRegor`, dybskiy and gRegor`_ joined the channel
gRegor` joined the channel
# 03:03 gRegor` ben_thatmustbeme: Google Hangout, you mean?
# 03:03 gRegor` Or meatspace hangout?
# 03:03 gRegor` sans computers :)
# 03:06 bret although the post is still in git history XD
# 03:08 gRegor` Sounds good, ben. Where are you, btw?
# 03:11 ben_thatmustbeme huh, didn't even notice i had several more webmentions that had not processed correctly
# 03:21 gRegor` KartikPrabhu: Added some notes off the top of my head. Feel free to add / tweak
caseorganic joined the channel
# 03:23 ben_thatmustbeme kylewm, also currently all a mention does is link back to it in the "recent mentions" it doesn't associate with the post yet
# 03:28 gRegor` Yeah, Portland and SF had their meetings, so they used chat for notes
# 03:31 kylewm ben_thatmustbeme: actually that's a cool argument for human centric url design. even though it's just the url you still get my meaning :-)
# 03:31 kylewm or perhaps that just shows my lack of thoughtful content
# 03:37 Loqi Ok, I'll tell them that when I see them next
# 03:39 ben_thatmustbeme then just call a generic addComment() function that each model just has to implement for itself, and voila
dybskiy and gRegor` joined the channel
# 04:25 GWG I'm trying to figure out this h-entry stuff
caseorganic, KevinMarks, friedcell, cweiske, j12t, voxpelli, eschnou, paulcp, tobiastom, j12t_ and pdurbin joined the channel
# 07:56 tommorris.org edited /why (+620) "/* Avoiding problems */ Personalisation/filter bubble, plus the always entertaining "My TiVo Thinks I'm Gay!" issue." (
view diff )
jsilvestre, pfenwick, krendil, dybskiy, Sebastien-L, tantek, pdurbin and eschnou joined the channel
eschnou, dybskiy, adactio, Sebastien-L, pfenwick, aboodman, scor, friedcell, jsilvestre and chloeweil joined the channel
# 13:56 cweiske oh, so it seems Loqi does parse webmentions correctly
ben_thatmustbeme, ttepasse, j12t and scor joined the channel
barnabywalters, BjornW, gRegor`, paulcp, dybskiy and _6a68 joined the channel
iangreenleaf, dybskiy and dybskiy_ joined the channel
pauloppenheim joined the channel
# 15:58 GWG kylewm: Thank you for the kind words. Still haven't gotten to replies. I have an idea about them
caseorganic joined the channel
dybskiy joined the channel
# 16:19 Loqi Ok, I'll tell them that when I see them next
# 16:20 bret i suppose the next part would be to actually work on make it easy for people to support it
tilgovi_, tantek, paulcp, KartikPrabhu and snarfed joined the channel
# 16:42 Loqi snarfed: KartikPrabhu left you a message on 4/9 at 8:37pm: no timezones in bridgy timestamps? default to UTC?
Sebastien-L and benprew joined the channel
# 16:50 snarfed KartikPrabhu: you mean in the translated mf2 posts, right?
# 16:50 snarfed if the silo provides a timestamp, i try to preserve it
# 16:50 snarfed but i don't currently look for a timestamp in the user's profile and apply it
# 16:51 snarfed hmm, it looks like i might actually fail w/twitter
j12t joined the channel
# 16:52 snarfed i'll file an issue. any interest in trying to fix it? should be pretty straightforward
chloeweil, kbs and jsilvestre joined the channel
# 17:00 aaronpk they have some better docs and guidelines coming out soon which will explain this, but,
# 17:01 aaronpk "At this time, the comments API is being primarily being enabled for brand customer service communication and rights management workflows."
# 17:01 aaronpk so now I'm wondering how I can turn ownyourgram into a branc management solution :)
# 17:02 snarfed disappointing, but nicer than "no way, we think you're sketchy, and we're shutting down your api access"
kbs` joined the channel
# 17:09 aaronpk but in the mean time, I think finding a solution for original post discovery might be a good place to start
caseorganic and caseorga_ joined the channel
# 17:11 kylewm I am thinking I will to implement a proof of concept with an original-post-query rel endpoint
warden_ joined the channel
# 17:15 kylewm query endpoint will take a syndication= POST parameter, and will 310 redirect to the original, if found
# 17:17 gRegor` I like the idea, but seems like it adds a lot of work to brid.gy. KartikPrabhu and I were talking about that last night.
# 17:17 kylewm I'd love to hear your thoughts gRegor` and KartikPrabhu
# 17:18 kylewm (and if you'd add them to the GH issue that would be lovely too)
# 17:18 gRegor` Sure, I can do that later.
# 17:18 snarfed so, yet another thought. facebook lets you kind of "hide" the original post link in an action, which we've done with "See Original"
# 17:18 snarfed i wonder if there's a way to do something similar with twitter, etc
# 17:19 snarfed ie semi-hide metadata in a tweet, either via the api or whatever
# 17:19 gRegor` snarfed: That's what I was saying would be ideal. But Twitter doesn't support metadata that I'm aware of.
# 17:19 gRegor` Aside from photos, I guess.
# 17:19 gRegor` Er, and location I guess.
# 17:19 snarfed gRegor`: yeah, and even then pictures need a pic.twitter.com link
# 17:20 gRegor` Geocode-to-source-url translation!
# 17:20 kylewm metadata would scratch my itch, but not aaronpk's issue with instagram right?
# 17:20 snarfed if instagram had a similar way to hide metadata, then maybe it would?
# 17:21 snarfed or do you mean aaronpk's instagram issue that there's no (official) api for posting/commenting in the first place?
# 17:21 gRegor` kylewm: without a backlink, brid.gy (or whatever service) would need to post every reply to your query endpoint, right?
# 17:21 kylewm I thought it was that there was no good way to include a post link
# 17:22 gRegor` I guess once it gets a response 301 it could cache that, but for how long?
# 17:22 kylewm gRegor`: I was thinking it would cache the endpoint, so it didn't have to discover that again
# 17:23 kylewm and that then yes you'd send every reply back to the author's query endpoint, if there is one
# 17:23 snarfed kylewm: re instagram, you can just include the link as text in the caption. not ideal, but that's the only way bridgy supports
# 17:24 snarfed re caching, 301 is supposed to be permanent, so bridgy could/should store it forever. (302 is temporary)
# 17:24 kylewm ohh, and it should be a GET not a POST, huh. so that target=query?syndication=syndicated-copy looks to bridgy just like a shortened url
# 17:24 snarfed kylewm: oh wow. embedding the query url directly in target is brilliant
KevinMarks_ joined the channel
# 17:26 kylewm does aaronpk include the link as text in instagram captions? I'm not seeing it
# 17:30 aaronpk the whole problem I have is I have no way of programmatically adding content to instagram
# 17:30 KevinMarks_ given the existing pattern of using photos on twitter to quote longer-than-tweet-length posts, you could POSSE and image that includes the post and a link
# 17:31 KevinMarks_ do twitter/instagram regenerate the images? You can put urls in image header tags. Or just OCRable stuff in the bitmap
# 17:32 aaronpk but KevinMarks_ the problem is instagram also doesn't let you post photos from outside the app
# 17:32 aaronpk so the only way to get content there is from the app itself
# 17:35 KevinMarks_ right, but you can run another app that mungs photos in your camera roll
# 17:36 kylewm love it. I'd suspect that instagram would kill your metadata (EXIF) at least
# 17:36 kylewm but a watermark or something would be awesome
# 17:37 snarfed twitter definitely strips location from exif. not sure about other parts
# 17:38 KevinMarks_ on iOS there are various apps that do this already so you can have non-square images or multicam things
# 17:50 aaronpk I want ownyourgram.com to be able to add a copyright notice to people's photos
# 17:50 KevinMarks Or you could make it look like a slide positive, like some apps do, but put your url instead of a frame number
# 17:50 Loqi aaronpk meant to say: I want ownyourgram.com to be able to add a copyright notice to brands's photos
# 17:52 snarfed …except that's kinda separate from commenting. how/why would you need the comment api?
# 17:55 aaronpk i probably need to add some marketing fluff copy to the home page first
dybskiy joined the channel
# 17:59 aaronpk so bridgy would have to do OCR for the bottom slice of the image to find the URL from it?
# 18:01 aaronpk heh in order to watermark the photo with my URL, I'd have to make a URL first before the photo actually exists on my site
# 18:02 KevinMarks POSSE makes sense for brands too (I remember trying to explain this at Salesforce to buddymedia folks)
# 18:02 aaronpk so what's wrong with the rel original discovery idea?
# 18:03 snarfed (re bridgy, i'm open to OCR either linked in or as a separate service. i'm just a bit skeptical, and i probably wouldn't implement it myself)
# 18:04 aaronpk snarfed: where you'd query an API on my site passing in an instagram URL and I'd return the canonical URL
# 18:04 snarfed there was more discussion of that earlier today. we like it. bonus points: if it returns a 301, you can embed the query url directly in the webmention target
# 18:05 aaronpk so in that case the only thing bridgy needs is to know what domain an instagram account is associated with
# 18:05 kbs [barcodes? usually easier to extract.]
# 18:06 aaronpk kbs: I don't think the technicalities of the OCR are the problem...
# 18:06 aaronpk also doing OCR has the benefit of the URL being human readable too
# 18:07 snarfed all true, but just as one data point, i'd personally lean much more toward the query solution than ocr or barcode, since they seem more complicated and brittle
# 18:08 aaronpk tho I might try to watermark my photos anyway cause KevinMarks's demo one looked neat
KevinMarks joined the channel
# 18:15 KevinMarks_ I like the idea of using instagram's own schtick of "look like film" as a way to pass POSSE data through
# 18:20 aaronpk there is something strangely appealing about that
dybskiy and tilgovi_ joined the channel
caseorganic, paulcp and tantek joined the channel
# 18:59 kylewm kbs: heya, I added a PGP fingerprint to my twitter bio ... were you saying that buys me something with Lindy?
# 19:00 kbs kylewm: yep :) let me pull up the link to the doc that I'm using
# 19:01 kbs ah, twitter bio - not a tweet. That should be fine to, nothing else to do
# 19:02 kbs you can also add it to your g+ profile page [more room there] and it will pick it up. (testing ...)
# 19:03 kbs (Any fingerprints you directly add to your twitter/g+ profile should get picked up during rel=me checking) you can additionally point to a gist or a tweet using an rel=key-fingerprint link as well
# 19:05 kbs I'm just in the process of updating a downloadable jar/source, etc - you can play with it directly
# 19:05 kbs needs java and is a local web-server
# 19:06 kbs snarfed: [don't think I got a chance to show that it to you
# 19:06 kbs but if you add your fingerprint to your g+ profile, it'll get added to the card as a validation point]
# 19:07 ben_thatmustbeme hmm, i'm trying to decide if i should have notes and posts stored separately in the DB or exactly the same with just a type flag. Anyone see any downside?
# 19:07 kylewm oh cool, I will try it with rel=key-fingerprint. is the jar somewhere that i can run locally?
# 19:08 kbs kylewm: yes - give me about an hour - in the middle of fxing a few things
# 19:10 kbs snarfed: nope. Can't hurt I think, but this was more my random experiment to see whether keyservers could be sidestepped in the indieweb context, where people are identified by one of their profile urls and have easier control over revoking old keys, adding new ones etc
# 19:10 kylewm I like how the key-fingerprint authentication scheme is basically the same thing reddit does for AMAs of famous people :)
# 19:11 kylewm ben_thatmustbeme: before switching to flat files, I stored everything as the same type in the database and used a post_type field to construct the url
# 19:12 kbs kylewm: AMAs - oh right, didn't make the connection but yea :)
# 19:13 kylewm ben_thatmustbeme: my one recommendation is don't let the database define your url structure because you can change the former but you're always stuck with the latter
# 19:14 kylewm but if post/2014 is what you want, I don't see a problem with it
caseorga_, pauloppenheim, yaf, rektide, KartikPrabhu, tahnok, gRegor` and kbs joined the channel
# 19:50 kbs Probably some subset of you will have root-ca errors :) please try using the root-ca cert and the magic incantation and give it a whirl.
# 19:53 kbs [and yes, your eyes will bleed if you look at the code, which should be buried safely inside a nuclear waste container ;)]
j12t joined the channel
# 19:57 kbs thanks :) was fun to tinker with this - get a better feel for what all the folks are upto, if nothing else.
# 19:57 Loqi kbs meant to say: thanks :) was fun to tinker with this - I got a better feel for what all the folks are upto, if nothing else.
benprew and tantek joined the channel
# 20:11 gRegor` Very cool, kbs
# 20:11 ben_thatmustbeme sweet. by the end of this week i might actually have likes, replys, and mentions all working and displaying appropriately
tilgovi joined the channel
# 20:38 ben_thatmustbeme yeah, i noticed that aaronpk when I was reading back through the logs. The guy realized he was completely wrong on the premise there.
# 20:40 aaronpk yeah the thing he was wrong about was it only dumping from recently deallocated ram
# 20:40 aaronpk which means private keys are much more likely to be dumped
# 20:42 aaronpk kind of, it's like he wanted to delete the whole thing since it says "retracted"
eschnou joined the channel
# 20:45 tantek I interpreted the [retracted] as retracting the summary in the name (and slug) of the post
# 20:45 tantek good example of when it would be useful to update the slug of a post
# 20:46 aaronpk he added this header above the original post: "The incorrect post is below, so you know how wrong I was"
# 20:51 tantek btw - the one person @MozSF location without a personal domain name last night successfully purchased found/chose/purchased one by the end of the Homebrew Website Club meetup.
krendil joined the channel
# 21:03 gRegor` I'm glad that guy retracted. Good example of the dangers of accepting a blog post and not being paranoid. ;)
KevinMarks and ttepasse joined the channel
# 21:05 aaronpk i'm still not changing my MO for my not-critical stuff
caseorga_ joined the channel
# 21:19 gRegor` Modus operandi? (sp)
# 21:19 gRegor` Woo, I spelled it right.
# 21:19 gRegor` Fancypants for "mode of operation"
# 21:20 tantek I keep thinking of the cute little dirt cleaning robot in Wall•E
# 21:21 gRegor` I don't remember that. I should re-watch it. Was his name Mo?
_6a68 joined the channel
# 21:24 gRegor` I was just quoting dictionary.com. It's on the internet, it must be true! ;)
# 21:26 ben_thatmustbeme still angry i had to turn off processing of webmentions... i figure adding 300 mentions from a site is probably not correct
# 21:28 aaronpk a critique of indieweb but from indiewebify.me as the starting point
# 21:30 tantek however: "general idea isn’t too difficult for someone accustomed to writing HTML and CSS – microformats2" that's a good sign
# 21:31 tantek and hey this is pretty funny, it's a consultant saying, this is too hard for me, don't hire me to do it ;)
# 21:31 kylewm I like "I hope the current model of IndieWebify is an intermediate step towards a simpler adoption pattern that will compete with Apple and Google from a usability perspective."
# 21:32 kylewm well, not the stuff about Apple and Google...
# 21:32 gRegor` I think being able to link to a WordPress theme (or several) that are mf2 ready would be helpful.
# 21:32 gRegor` I'm sure they're out there
# 21:32 gRegor` and/or I should make some.
# 21:33 gRegor` One of the things I like about indieweb is that it seems everyone *is* trying to make it easier
# 21:33 gRegor` I'll take a look.
# 21:34 kylewm from talking to GWG, it seemed like there is some confusion about the microformats plugin specifically
# 21:34 gRegor` I also need to review indiewebify.me. Only briefly used it once or twice
# 21:37 gRegor` As much as I dislike WordPress, I guess I should set up an install to play around with.
# 21:41 gRegor` Initially typoed "braindumb." It's been one of those days.
j12t and _6a68 joined the channel
# 21:55 bret re datahiveconsulting.com is there another easier way to do cross site discussions we are missing? ;)
scor joined the channel
# 22:01 pauloppenheim re datahiveconsulting: this is the brain damage that startups have done to us
# 22:06 aaronpk why are the font sizes in every other tweet different?
# 22:10 tantek I meant the content, not the restyled profiles
# 22:10 tantek seriously, Twitter design just seriously jumped the shark
pfenwick and _6a68 joined the channel
benprew joined the channel
# 22:17 tantek aaronpk so I'm much more annoyed by the visual noise added between tweets
# 22:19 aaronpk interesting that they're showing retweet/reply/fav counts now
# 22:20 tantek they've been showing that in the mobile iOS app for a while
# 22:20 tantek but yes, interesting from a "stream view of an h-entry" perspective
# 22:22 aaronpk heh actually the new stream layout looks way more similar to my site now
dybskiy joined the channel
# 22:40 tantek KartikPrabhu: it's a race to a lowest common denominator stream UI
warden__ joined the channel
# 22:50 gRegor` You guys just discovering the latest FB-ification? That's what I've been complaining about. :)
# 22:51 gRegor` Tweets different sizes based on their popularity. Oy.
scor joined the channel
# 22:53 gRegor` On the plus side, the threshold for making a better indieweb UI just got easier. :)
# 22:55 gRegor` You going to participate?
pfenwick, fmarier, dybskiy and dybskiy_ joined the channel
# 23:39 j12t Has anybody written a history of Indie Web Camp? Like how the name was picked etc?
# 23:48 j12t kylewm: great, I missed that one (“history” was about something else). But: that’s all the facts, but where’s “the story”?
# 23:48 j12t Orally, I’ve heard it a few times, about frustrations with conferences etc
# 23:51 KartikPrabhu j12t: there is no "the story" specially with so many people involved everyone would have their own reasons for being on IWC. Maybe you want "the stories" of the founders?
# 23:52 kylewm I feel like I did hear something specifically about why they started the first IWC, curious if that's written down
# 23:53 j12t Everybody comes at this from different personal histories, I realize that, but somebody some day said “and there shall be a thing and it shall be called Indie Web Camp and it will only have paid marketing speeches” … oops