2015-04-21 UTC
# 00:00 kylewm you always say "I have returned", I thought it was a SC reference
# 00:01 kylewm well I always hear it in the dragoon's voice, just so you know
# 00:01 GWG I meant, I've never seen that before today
lukebrooker joined the channel
# 00:14 GWG I think Tantek knows more people in NYC than I do
tantek joined the channel
# 00:51 tantek also - advice for NYC - plan / create / announce the events at least 2-4 weeks in advance
# 00:51 tantek people seem to lock down their schedules in advance in NYC, in contrast to SF where people often make day-of decisions
gRegorLove joined the channel
# 01:11 aaronpk it used to be "Receive direct messages from any follower"
behind_you, snarfed, KartikPrabhu and wolftune joined the channel
lukebrooker, afrogeek, KartikPrabhu, tilgovi, cstanhope, todrobbins, nloadholtes, frzn and tantek joined the channel
# 04:55 tantek hmm - my two replies to GWG didn't make it through from my IRC client to the server
# 04:56 tantek GWG, I mean including inviting people - e.g. past IWC NYC attendees (2-4 weeks in advance)
# 04:58 tantek aaronpk - hmm - that's kind of more of a screenshot than a quote of a tweet
# 04:59 tantek aaronpk - also - is that really an anstronaut with a ST:Voyager outfit?!?
lukebrooker joined the channel
# 05:00 tantek what do you think of the ethics or appropriateness of quoting a deleted tweet? I felt more ok about it since it was from a pseudonymous account.
# 05:01 tantek only reason I could see the tweet is I had a tab open to @Swiftonsecurity's profile page
# 05:01 tantek also, there's the subject matter irony - of quoting a deleted tweet from a pseudonymous security tweeter.
# 05:01 aaronpk what if you had posted the quote of it, then it was deleted months later?
# 05:02 aaronpk did you know it was deleted when you quoted it then?
# 05:02 tantek this is *knowingly* posting a quote of a deleted tweet
# 05:02 tantek which is why I didn't bother explicitly quoting the first two
# 05:03 tantek not quoting the first two encourages clicking on them which shows alot more context than if I had quoted them inline
# 05:03 aaronpk i think the fact it's a pseudonymous account makes it mostly okay
# 05:03 tantek and especially since it's about security, that makes it kind of funny
# 05:03 aaronpk i'm trying to imagine if it was a non-pseudonymous account
KartikPrabhu joined the channel
# 05:04 tantek Twitter is certainly ok with "posted the quote of it, then it was deleted months later" - because their embed code/HTML has inline content of a tweet so that even if a tweet is unavailable, the quote is still displayed on your site.
# 05:05 aaronpk oh good point! cause the "embed code" contains the tweet text
# 05:05 aaronpk it's a feed reader and has a bunch of your content in it!
# 05:08 aaronpk i installed the parser locally so I could run it on my own local domains
Erkan_Yilmaz and elima joined the channel
KevinMarks__, cweiske, yakker, nloadholtes, LauraJ, wolftune, snarfed, Jihaisse, KevinMarks, KevinMarks___, KartikPrabhu, loic_m, friedcell and petermolnar joined the channel
gRegorLove, loic_m, interactivist, LauraJ, stream7 and nloadholtes joined the channel
# 10:48 Loqi Ok, I'll tell him that when I see him next
squeakytoy2 joined the channel
friedcell joined the channel
AcidNerd and LauraJ joined the channel
stream7 joined the channel
# 13:06 petermolnar eh... flickr is refusing my syndications lately and I was wondering if it even worth pushing to Flickr... what do you think, indieweb, is anyone still using flickr?
eschnou, frzn and KartikPrabhu joined the channel
interactivist and pfefferle joined the channel
snarfed and KartikPrabhu joined the channel
acegiak joined the channel
# 14:31 jonnybarnes the push spec (v0.4) doesn't actually talk about notifying the hub (i.e. a POST request with hub.mode=publish)
KartikPrabhu joined the channel
brooksbrown joined the channel
KartikPrabhu and snarfed joined the channel
# 14:46 jonnybarnes cweiske: I'd printed the spec off and I was sat here going through the pages wondering if I was going mad...
# 14:48 jonnybarnes currently a hub, but just to play with the new lumen micro-framework
interactivist, pfefferle and fourtonfish joined the channel
# 15:19 kylewm acegiak: would you consider marking up your repost of h-cites with e-content instead of p-content?
# 15:20 kylewm trying to figure out how to display more info for them in my reader
fkooman, KartikPrabhu, tilgovi, Sebastien-L, alexhartley and yakker joined the channel
# 15:59 KevinMarks ben_thatmustbeme: is your notification stuff public? Gina trapani was looking for examples
wolftune, KevinMarks__ and KevinMarks joined the channel
chalettu, LauraJ, tantek, friedcell, snarfed, wolftune, fkooman, eschnou, alexhartley, benwerd, scor and KartikPrabhu joined the channel
# 18:16 bret wow air bnb requires a facebook or linked in with activity to verify
friedcell joined the channel
# 18:20 tantek how would you do an indieweb peer-to-peer airbnb?
frzn_, eschnou, KartikPrabhu and friedcell joined the channel
KartikPrabhu1 and KartikPrabhu joined the channel
# 18:46 tantek GWG, are you FB friends with zachdonovan? As co-organizer of HWC NYC you need to do the inviting both by email and by adding to the FB invite. Invite in all the places.
# 18:50 KevinMarks_ GWG note on the event that it is every 2 weeks, that way people can take note
# 18:51 tantek right, we should be creating the events a month in advance
eschnou joined the channel
davidmead joined the channel
# 19:03 tantek KevinMarks: I saw Deb last weekend and she said she was going to make it this Wednesday to HWC SF
alexhart_ and scor joined the channel
# 19:20 tantek does it ever happen to anyone else where you code something that you expect does just one thing at a time, but it turns out you structured your code so that you put in the right place for an iteration, so when you went to add that support, it was already working?
# 19:21 tantek e.g. I just discovered my Falcon code that curls Bridgy to POSSE likes to faves on Twitter actually does multiple likes in a row automatically.
# 19:21 tantek I just posted 7 likes of tweets in a row, and with one "like it" button press, all of them were POSSEd at once
# 19:23 KevinMarks_ I've had that kind of experience with Python before, and a little bit with node, though there it's more that calbackiness makes things work in parallel
# 19:27 tantek KevinMarks: yeah - apparently I accidentally put the code not where I intended initially, but where it turned out to be more useful!
# 19:27 aaronpk tho i would phrase it "prioritizing content posted directly into the feed" to avoid the double negative
# 19:27 benwerd Which means every indieweb app, as well as apps like Buffer and Hootsuite, is screwed on Facebook
# 19:28 tantek what does posted directly into the feed mean? using the web UI/
# 19:29 kylewm I wonder if it means posted directly as opposed to "reshared a post from Clickhole.com" or whatever
KartikPrabhu joined the channel
# 19:42 tantek what about all the noise from FB Share buttons?
# 19:43 kylewm How confident are you that posted directly means "not posted via the API"? I wouldn't read it that way necessarily at all
Estr and KartikPrabhu joined the channel
# 19:44 aaronpk do you think it's more change about content from pages?
gRegorLove joined the channel
# 19:45 kylewm I was just wondering if it was shared rather than direct content
# 19:46 tantek wow did you see what just happened with that accessible_rr tweet?
# 19:46 kylewm it's a very fuzzy post ... lots of tea leaf reading possible
# 19:46 aaronpk tantek: whoa, they copied your original post to their site and then linked to *their* copy in their tweet?
# 19:48 tantek did they do it manually? or did a bot go crawl my PSL and see "accessibility" there (which is NOT in the POSSE tweet)
# 19:50 aaronpk oh I see, it's showing me the list of people in the reply chain
# 19:51 tantek or just their way of "ellipsing" the remaining
# 19:53 aaronpk oh you know what? it's showing me the names of people I follow, and the "1 other" is someone I don't follow
# 19:54 aaronpk lots of semi-private content, or at least things I don't want discoverable
# 19:55 tantek how should we start indicating the more solid nature of the 7/11-12 IWC 2015 date?
# 19:55 aaronpk it's one-button sharing from skitch, easiest way for me to post a screenshot
# 19:56 tantek KevinMarks, you said you can for sure make 7/11-12 right?
# 19:57 aaronpk updating the home page would be a good start, it still links to cambridge
# 19:57 tantek aaronpk - how do we fix the mediawiki overzealous caching problem?
# 19:59 tantek is anyone who's (co-)organizing IWC Germany here in IRC?
# 20:00 aaronpk tho I can really only help with the actual event, not so much the planning
# 20:00 aaronpk marc thiele is the main organizer, he pops in occasionally
# 20:00 tantek that was a bit of a last-minute scramble for IWC Cambridge
# 20:01 tantek e.g. updating the home page re: Next IndieWebCamp
# 20:01 aaronpk yeah, might be able to do that tonight or tomorrow night
# 20:01 tantek I'm assuming Marc is taking care of local resources?
# 20:01 tantek maybe you can get adactio to help with wikifying IWC Germany 2015
KartikPrabhu joined the channel
# 20:05 tantek for IWC 2015 dates, let's put out a heads-up (going to post a note), and ask folks to add more
# 20:10 aaronpk i'm gonna remove 'other earlier dates' from the page
# 20:13 tantek haha ^^^ I wonder if that's kylewm responding to seeing my note in his reader show up in real time via PuSH
# 20:14 kylewm tantek: I wish that was it! I am lurking here :)
# 20:21 aaronpk tantek: I blockde out July 11-12 on our office calendar
# 20:22 aaronpk (realized I hadn't actually checked if anything else was happening here that day yet!)
# 20:30 gRegorLove My goal is to have written about IWC 2014 before IWC 2015. :)
bret1, KevinMarks__ and KevinMarks joined the channel
# 20:56 tantek alistapart article quality has really dropped
KevinMarks__, lukebrooker, Nowaker and Unifex joined the channel
# 21:13 tantek I hope to have a blogged about IndieWebCamp 2014 in summary before next month :/
# 21:27 ben_thatmustbeme So my notifications are working out okay, still need to look in to getting it better about unified notifications as in 'dismiss in one place dismisses all'
# 21:29 KevinMarks_ ben_thatmustbeme: are they in a form we can see? people were asking for examples to show off
j12t joined the channel
# 21:35 ben_thatmustbeme which is why i'm thinking that I may end up with a feed that is basically an activity stream 2.0 of incoming things
Sebastien-L joined the channel
# 21:40 tantek ben_thatmustbeme: why not an h-feed of incoming things?
# 21:41 tantek I think that's what aaronpk built on his own site - of incoming webmentions maybe
# 21:42 ben_thatmustbeme tantek also hoping it will help inform me on exactly what i see as the issues with AS2.0
# 21:43 tantek main issue with AS2 is excess. excess vocab, syntax, complexity etc.
# 21:44 tantek would be interesting to see you do it with h-feed first, see how minimal you can make it
# 21:44 tantek with h-feed, at least you'd have readers that you could use to view / verify your output
# 21:44 tantek that way you could have a functional baseline to start with
KartikPrabhu and lukebrooker joined the channel
bret1, KartikPrabhu and j12t joined the channel
# 22:43 rhiaro aaronpk: I tried dockerising Quill but couldn't get the url routing to work, I've never done anything this fancy with php before..
# 22:43 aaronpk ooh hmm... i've never tried that with a php app before
# 22:44 rhiaro It shouldn't be anything to do with docker, I probably just had apache set up wrong
# 22:44 aaronpk you should be able to use the built-in php server actually, but i've never tried that
# 22:45 rhiaro I can't remember what I was doing, I apparently didn't save anything
# 22:45 aaronpk considers adding a filter to make loqi not match "what is" questions followed by "you" or "your"
# 22:46 aaronpk rhiaro: do you have a recommendation for a tutorial on getting set up with docker? I haven't gone through the process from scratch myself yet
# 22:46 kylewm Quill works in just php -S localhost:8080, except I get an exception in Slim
# 22:46 rhiaro aaronpk: I just muddled through the docker documentation
# 22:47 rhiaro also KitB is an expert and is in this channel, so you can ask him :) (that's mostly what I have been doing)
# 22:47 aaronpk kylewm: you have to do that from the "public" folder but htat looks like it's working!
# 22:48 aaronpk wow that's kind of magic, how'd that even happen?
# 22:49 aaronpk how does the built-in php web server know to route requests through index.php?
# 22:49 aaronpk kylewm: i think i may have fixed that bug already?
friedcell joined the channel
# 22:50 rhiaro aaronpk: anyway I'm gonna try setting that up again sometime this week, you'll hear from me then..
# 22:51 aaronpk now you can use the fancy frequency+location filtering it does too :)
# 22:51 aaronpk might need some fine-tuning to prioritize location over frequency though, not sure
# 22:52 aaronpk oh man i haven't even considered what to call my own checkin app
# 22:52 rhiaro I'm calling it Burrow, after the weasley clock thing
# 22:52 rhiaro although it was a close one with Mortal Peril
# 22:53 rhiaro I was also thinking Spyglass as inkeeping with your naming scheme
snarfed joined the channel
# 22:57 aaronpk do we have a wiki page that documents the methods of communication we use here? e.g. no mailing lists, irc+wiki only?
# 22:58 rhiaro aaronpk: I think that's on the getting started page or something
# 22:59 aaronpk i guess i was looking for a more positive framing of it
# 23:00 tantek we had to do a negative (cut out email) to get here so I'm not sure how to better state that
# 23:02 tantek because IRC clients still require technical goop
# 23:03 aaronpk right but that detracts from the purpose of the "how we discuss things" topic
# 23:03 tantek aaronpk - what's the need for a "how we discuss things" topic ?
# 23:04 aaronpk well the immediate need is to answer Ann's question of how we discuss things
# 23:04 aaronpk and I figured if she's asking, other people probably would ask in the future, and I'd rather reply with a URL
# 23:05 tantek it's because people have asked that exact question
# 23:05 tantek you have to say no to things in order to focus on things that matter
# 23:05 tantek where's Ann's precise question? can you provide a permalink?
# 23:08 rhiaro irc is pretty alien to many even tecchie people. It's good to be friendly about it if they have to use it
# 23:09 tantek rhiaro: strongly agreed about making IRC more friendly - it's why we have the best/friendliest IRC logs
# 23:09 tantek which are much better than any email archives
# 23:10 tantek comparing those A/B usually convinces people quickly
# 23:10 tantek unless they're essayists and are upset they can't just spew forth long essays that they expect everyone to read
# 23:10 rhiaro and then they should be on their own site of course ;)
FergusL joined the channel
# 23:24 aaronpk Loqi already is parsing out wiki edits for only the socialwg pages, he could easily email them
# 23:25 tantek aaronpk: question is, would we get any more productive participation out of it?
# 23:25 tantek is it really worth bridging to a honeypot for timewasters?
# 23:25 aaronpk possibly it is worth asking if people would find that useful
# 23:25 tantek probably better to just let email lists implode all by themselves
# 23:27 rhiaro maybe interesting to generate something one could subscribe to with a reader... if one wanted to..
# 23:28 aaronpk tantek: the recentchanges feed on the w3c wiki is unusable because it combines all WGs
# 23:28 tantek email an IRC log digest at the end of every day
# 23:30 aaronpk i want to make an h-feed of the IRC logs but formatted as one entry per "conversation thread" where it would just look for a gap in conversations of like >30 minutes and generate a new h-entry of that
Sebastien-L joined the channel
# 23:47 kylewm if you added support webfinger and oauth1, it doesn't seem all that hard to speak with a pump server
# 23:47 tantek kylewm: it was always more work than necessary
# 23:48 tantek it's not whether it's possible or not, it's about how necessary are all the requirements
# 23:48 kylewm well I think pump was an attempt at simplifying the ostatus/salmon/openid stuff
# 23:49 kylewm it may still be one or two levels too complicated
# 23:49 tantek which means it may be a good candidate for a proxy for backcompat
# 23:51 tantek we should treat complex standards the same as snowflake APIs
# 23:51 kylewm aaronpk: i don't know the answer to that question, i think their goal was for everyone to use pump.io as a library rather than a protocol
# 23:51 kylewm but why didn't anybody else implement Push 0.4 before you and cweiske did?
# 23:52 tantek since advocating everyone use the same library is a monoculture
# 23:52 aaronpk kylewm: possibly because the spec was not very well written
# 23:52 aaronpk or, because there was not a clear incentive for using PuSH
# 23:53 tantek more important to just get stuff published ( -> microformats)
# 23:54 tantek also a good reason for minimal building block standards