#GWGBut if I have no h-card attached to the h-entry, only to the h-feed, I think some people have issues
#voxpelliGWG: maybe, but for any blog with a single author it would be pretty repetitive to include it in each item in a list
#voxpelliso from an indieweb perspective I think one should expect that any list of h-entries have the h-card on the h-feed level – but I haven't checked if that's the recommended assumption though
#GWGI need to improve the logic for my site to address that though.
#GWGAnd my site code, being WordPress, is written in pieces. A custom theme plus plugins.
loic_m_ joined the channel
#voxpelliGWG: you have a reader or why would it affect your site?
#ZegnatGWG: I think you are talking about /authorship, and if the h-entry of interest is missing an author, parsers should look at the parent h-feed
#GWGZegnat: I am, but people keep saying they have problems with my site.
#voxpellionly indie readers really care about h-feeds?
wolftune joined the channel
#voxpellieg. WebMentions mostly expects a single h-entry per URL I think
#ZegnatIf they are having problems you could point them at /authorship, their discovery might be wrong. It says right there that people should check the parent h-feed of the h-entry for author
#GWGI usually assume I'm wrong and someone else is right around hre
#voxpelliZegnat++ for that link (a bit weird that the microformats wiki about at least h-feed doesn't mention it – feels like a microformat think more than an indieweb one?)
#GWGvoxpelli: I'm trying to remember who last said they had problems
[aaronpk] joined the channel
#[aaronpk]I need to finish my rewrite. I just lost the last couple commits because I lost track of the state of things and somehow managed to delete some commits. *tear*
#voxpellialso – I guess when it comes to stuff like this I think we all have to think about about what we think is right and do that and document our experiences and compare them to the experience by others – often there may be gaps in the existing documented experiences that make it not fully fit our own scenarios
#[aaronpk]That's what you'd thing but I can't find them
#[aaronpk]Problem is I had the remote set to the same folder
#voxpelli[aaronpk]: the "git reflog" shows how the HEAD of your repo has moved around – somewhere you should find the commit hash of your lost commit and by checking that out as a new branch or something you can rediscover that data
snarfed joined the channel
#voxpelliold data isn't garbage collected in git for quite a while (believe me – I tried – after accidentally commiting +1GB of images to a code repo :P )
#voxpelliSeems like we don't have a page listing all the tools one can use to check conformance with? Like the testpinger, Indiewebify.me, the MF2-tests etc?
#voxpelliaaronpk: you know if we have such a test page where one can find all tools to "validate" ones implementations?
#GWGZegnat: I don't use an author property on hentrys
#GWGI think though I should improve the logic on that
#voxpelliGWG: you do on individual posts, don't you?
#GWGYes, because of the way I set up h-entry vs h-feed. I got the idea from pfefferle
#GWGWordPress has a post_class and a body_class function
#Zegnatthere is nothing wrong with setting an author per feed though, so you are doing things completely fine
#GWGI don't have h-card logic, which I need to put in
#voxpelliZegnat: don't think the testpinger is a good getting started thing though – more like: Do this once you're started and want to ensure your implementation is robust
snarfed joined the channel
#voxpelliis reading the "principles" page, finds "fun" as a list point, now wants to build an animated Gif micropub-thingie
#[aaronpk]I haven't seen such a list, but you could try searching for some tools that would be on t
#GWGI need more WordPress people willing to help with improving the situation there, even if just writing documentation or making suggestions for user improvements.
#voxpelli[snarfed]: especially good when one can include one in the other as well ;)
#GWGsnarfed: I do have a Micropub question I've been meaning to ask. How, with the plugin, are we deciding on deprecating things no longer part of the spec?
#voxpelliGWG: I would deprecate them in the next feature release and remove them in the one after (in semver-terms, deprecate in 0.1.0 and remove in 0.2.0) – unless the rest of the micropub community have a hard time keeping up on that specific feature
#aaronpkso anyway now I am thinking about how to handle this "collection" idea on my own site, where I want to have a post like a train ride appear on both my "travel" and "transport" feeds
#aaronpkwhich I realized is an awful lot like indienews
#aaronpkso I am considering implementing my "collection" idea as tagging posts with my own collection URLs I want them to appear on
#aaronpkright now i'm separating regular tags from person tags in the UI of my posts, they show up in separate places, and person tags have a little person icon next to them
#KartikPrabhuso you'd have to check if the tagged URL is the u-url or u-uid of the h-card
#aaronpkso I do think there is a user-visible reason to know the distinction between whether a URL tag is a person or not
#aaronpkI think the only way for me to move forward without resolving the person-tag vs other-url-tag issue is to store this in some other place, and only use u-syndication for indienews
#M-KodoAaronpk is it just me or does indienews need to be wrapped in an h-feed?
#KartikPrabhusyndication makes more sense for indienews if the only purpose is to ummm... syndicate
#aaronpkM-Kodo: it probably does! tho not required
#aaronpkso indienews can't have original content, so it really is an aggregator. i guess it's a question of the difference between an aggregator and a syndication destination
#KartikPrabhuisn't POSSE just like submitting to an aggregator?