voxpelligRegorLove: nope, rather the opposite – an increased complexity in many non-english ones and a difficulty in that the grammar might not always map 1:1
ZegnatHave you specified on a per-language basis though, gRegorLove? I can see a problem when I have to define my pronouns for both English and Swedish texts, if mf2 parsing does not include language information
voxpelliZegnat: until mf2 pars language tags on a property level one has to assume the language is that of the page and rather link to alternate language versions or something through rel-alternate
ZegnatI wonder how people are doing it right now, maybe I should ask around and see if any Swedes who use “hen” use any specific English pronouns and how they inform others of this
Zegnatvoxpelli, knowing our label culture, I bet you people wouldn’t be pleased with a single gender-neutral pronoun. It will just be used a lot in case X, and people who feel more like case Y will come up with their own
Zegnatsounds like what I am currently building, as I will be intertwining posts in 3 languages. But I am just going to put lang-attributes on the article-elements and call it a day
voxpellidepends on what one calls the old web, the IndieWeb is kind of bringing the social media of post-web 2.0 back to the blog-roots of the early web-2.0 era
voxpellipetermolnar: regarding your post types – sure that you will always have enough data to automatically decide? sounds like it would be simpler to just define type explicitly
petermolnarvoxpelli that is the question I'm trying to solve; indeed definind a type is easy, however, combining situations of if-elseif-else where the checks include exif of featured images, certain patterns in content ( like fenced code blocks ) are enough for ~90%; the rest is where I'm realizing I need at least one type of taxonomy ( meta ) that helps
gRegorLoveThe term "IndieWeb" makes sense to me as part of the event, IndieWebCamp, but I don't care for it a lot on its own. I'm unlikely to tell someone "I'm part of the IndieWeb" for example. I'm probably in the minority though. Not suggesting it be changed or not used or anything.
petermolnarKartikPrabhu all my posts are either Markdown or empty - the latter has a url and a webmention type as meta, but that doesn't help telling a note, a photo or an article apart
voxpelligRegorLove: I btw like the IndieWeb term as too much of discussions in tech today revolves around enterprise needs or startup needs, and the web should be for everyone
voxpellidepends on whether you want to starts experimenting with new kinds of tagging or such in your notes I'm thinking, without extending your autolinking upfront to handle them
[shaners]Re: no "name" -> note, in Homesteading Articles only require `content`, but allow `title` and `subtitle` (combined to make `p-name`). Whereas Notes also only require `content` and disallow `title` and `subtitle` (in this case, `name` == `content`).
peacekeep3r, mlncn, funwhilelost and snarfed joined the channel
davidpeachi love the idea of just posting content - no matter what 'type' it is. After few months of explicitly choosing which post type before writing
KartikPrabhu, snarfed and nitot joined the channel
LoqiGNU social is an free software project that "will be a decentralized social network that you can install on your own server" https://indiewebcamp.com/gnusocial
kylewmsingpolyma: kevinmarks: the wiki page has some info about subscribing to a non-gnusocial PuSH atom feed under Syndication; it would be great if you could expand it if you know more!
singpolymathe paragraph "As so very often with GNU projects it is really difficult to get information about it fast, you have to search and find it all over the internet" seems unhelpfully pejoritive and mean, but I've left it for now since it wasn't part of my edit
funwhilelostYeah, after reading the GNU social entry I found this helpful, too: "the only reason to POSSE to a service is if a) you have friends on that service (otherwise you're just spamming), and b) that service only allows people to subscribe to local-to-the-service accounts."
tantekvoxpelli, kylewm saying that anything is similar "because ActivityStreams" is a bit misleading since there are so many different explicit non-interoperaperable versions of ActivityStreams - such a generic statement cannot be used to meaningfully express equivalence/support/interop
voxpelliconsidering that Granary references eg. Cliqset as providing the same service before it I thought the roots within the OStatus world was evident
voxpelliand it kind of was like the IndieWeb in that it only advocated for using certain other technologies together, so it in itself never was a very concrete thing
Loqimarchitecture is a term for architecture-like diagrams that contain lots of jargon, buzzwords, or marketing phrases for sales or political reasons yet make little actual sense, especially if you look at the apparent or implied relationships therein https://indiewebcamp.com/marketecture
Loqimarchitecture is a term for architecture-like diagrams that contain lots of jargon, buzzwords, or marketing phrases for sales or political reasons yet make little actual sense, especially if you look at the apparent or implied relationships therein https://indiewebcamp.com/marketecture
tantekI submit that something like IndieMark, which has levels, and axes is MUCH more useful than a "stack" in terms of 1) motivating people to get started, and feeling good about even just getting started, and 2) always feeling like there is something more they can do to be better.
[shaners]I’ve got a few more issues to sort out before I can flip veganstraightedge.com over to the new Homesteading proper instead of my duct tape and popsicle sticks home grown thing.