Tino!tell KevinMarks I do not think Convoy does. I'm a convoy subscriber and it does not list Google+ in any way. That's besides the point though, I can syndicate to Google+ Pages now via the Buffer syndication plugin for known and Buffer setup to post to my Google+ page. It actually formats nicely. I'm now trying to get a backfeed working, which isn't possible at the moment. That sort of kills it for me. Then I rather manually paste a
aaronpki suspect the other reason is they'd want to offer a somewhat consistent experience when uploading from a computer, but it'd be non-trivial to replicate the image editing features solely in a browser
kylewmmy guess is that it's a very intentional choice to make the default behavior "post a quick shot of what's going on right now" rather than "take a reel of photos, painstakingly edit them after you vacation, and upload the whole batch"
aaronpktantek: i hadn't thought about that but you're probably right that the main reason for the switch was to reduce support costs from non-paying users
LoqiKevinMarks: Tino left you a message 8 hours, 33 minutes ago: I do not think Convoy does. I'm a convoy subscriber and it does not list Google+ in any way. That's besides the point though, I can syndicate to Google+ Pages now via the Buffer syndication plugin for known and Buffer setup to post to my Google+ page. It actually formats nicely. I'm now trying to get a backfeed working, which isn't possible at the moment. That sort of kills it for me. Then I rather manually paste a http://indiewebcamp.com/irc/2016-03-28/line/1459154063845
Loqipin or pinning is a feature that allows the author to choose a post to put at the top of their profile (or homepage) which is then called a pinned or sticky post https://indiewebcamp.com/pinned_post
KevinMarksI'll just run an O(n^2) process over my post that expands it by a factor of 10 in length (yes gzip will help) that can be reversed with a O(n) regex
KevinMarks“Mr. Whaley told the Observer in a recent phone conversation that he finds the way humans reason to be fundamentally flawed, but that advances in how we organize information could help rectify that”
tantekthe centralized annotation service apologists really don't get that all technology has a cultural context whether they want it to or not do they?
tantekthis in particular is disappointingly tonedeaf: ""Because you're speaking publicly, people are going to talk about it, on twitter, on facebook, on reddit... and with annotation. There's nothing different about annotation except that it 'magically' brings the things people say over top of your content."
tantekthis: “Currently, there isn’t even a means for Genius users to report abusive annotations, and there is certainly no way for creators to do so,” Ms. Dawson wrote in an email to the Observer. “The lack of a report function is a huge red flag.”
ZegnatAt the end of the day, I do kinda like annotations-for-comments as a style. Much like how Medium is using it. I also get why it would be cool to use it on any site you come across.
Zegnat"need a model for ... which we don't have a good answer to yet" is a good sign someone should look for the answer. They are trying out one possible answer over at Genius and Hypothesis
ZegnatWell, I do not disagree with you there, tantek. I still think they are giving an interesting problem a fair shot, and would commend them for that
voxpelliI do pay for it + use it on iOS to create the links posts on my site :) Can't see any fragmention-stuff in it though, however I could probably create my own linbks
Loqi[shaners]: tantek left you a message on 3/25 at 6:18pm: the microformat page on Wikipedia could certainly use a re-write but I'm not the person for it, being primary editor of all the new stuff and all. See: WP:NPOV http://indiewebcamp.com/irc/2016-03-25/line/1458955116441
tantekKevinMarks, gRegorLove perhaps that duplicate sharing is a good indication that you should add that to /News_Genius somewhere and document its problems
tanteklike is there some way to indicate (e.g. plain text phrase in "bio" field) on a silo profile that the reader should get updates from another URL instead
snarfed(just for the logs, for getting IG and other silos in your feed reader, i recommend https://instagram-atom.appspot.com/ and friends. granary is mainly aimed at developers.)
snarfedhuh, maybe. i think so few people actually read silos in their readers though - ie i haven't marketed the *-atom apps very hard - that it's not worth figuring that out
snarfeda reader could do it automatically. fetch the site in their silo profile's website link, compare that last few silo posts, see if they have corresponding posts on the site
KevinMarks“I can’t help somebody who thinks, or thinks he thinks, that editing a newspaper is censorship, or that throwing bricks is a demonstration while building tower blocks is social violence, or that unpalatable statement is provocation while disrupting the speaker is the exercise of free speech… Words don’t deserve that kind of malarkey. ”
tantekI'm wondering what kind of "opaque" files he's using? MSFT? PDF? because text files are hardly opaque in that Spotlight search indexes them transparently
tantekI sympathize sorta - even with non-opaque files (txt, html) I feel the inability to edit those in *trivially* publicly sync'd way is holding me back
Loqiadmin tax is all the time you spend maintaining your personal site, rather than actually using it (like to create posts) https://indiewebcamp.com/admin_tax
KevinMarksiDisk was Apple's cloud disk silo, that also provided web hosting and [[WebDAV]] support. It was shut down for random company reasons, causing many [[site-deaths]]
emceeaichthe photo gallery on iDisk that integrated with iPhoto used a bunch of custom properties on your iDisk so that iPhoto. Once you connected it to your iDisk, iPhoto would publish photos (and strips of each photo in a gallery for previews) to your iDisk. The web app was just javascript.
tantekwe've pretty much capped the creation/use of new rel-values which I feel like we should document somehow so we don't put more energy into it unintentionally
aaronpkwow this seems like a good reason not to use IFTTT: "IFTTT shall own all right, title, and interest (and all related moral rights and intellectual property rights) in and to the Developer Tool, Service, and Content."
aaronpkalso i'm not sure how IFTTT can claim to own the content that flows through it given that the USERS aren't even agreeing to this, this is the TOS for developers of IFTTT channels
tantekrather than asking the client for the socio-technical context, sounds like the lawyers were lazy / conservative and wrote up terms assuming "own all the things"