tantekDoes anyone here have a "donate" or "donations" link / page on their site? (in UI and functionality - different from just having a /pay or /payment page)
TheGilliesHave you guys thought of creating indieweb in a box that provides all the backend indieweb services. Then people can be free to create whatever front end they want?
sl007Zegnat : The problem here is that when a domain request would be submitted and somebody sniffs it, they know about our desire for a domain and could park it.
ZegnatIf nslookup gives you NXDOMAIN the domain is probably free, good enough cursory check. And this goes via your DNS provider, which you already seem to trust as you are using them to tell you what server goes with what domain.
Zegnatsl007, but if you are afraid of squatters grabbing the domain before you, all you are interested in is if a domain is free. nslookup is *almost* as good at checking that as whois. Though I agree whois over HTPS would be nice.
sketchessI found your 'appear' link and tried the other service with my browser, Zegnat. Compared to jitsy it is not my first choice for HWC. Firefox and jitsi go better together.
jeremycherfasZegnat: Oh, for sure. In IG I definitely look at far more photos than I like, and I like far more than I comment on. So that friction really isn’t an issue.
sketchessI do not know why it restarts as soon as I touch something. I can not really use it, not even mute or unmute, Zegnat. And even if I gave permission to microphone and camera it acts odd.
Zegnat“private window” is what Firefox calls it. That’s what I use for all the WebRTC stuff. Can’t tell you where it is in your menu, as you are on Windows and I am not
ZegnatIt does seem like the US guys are having a good time with Hangouts, so we might try that at some point. Maybe I am just inherently biased against Google.
Zegnatappear.in isn’t perfect either. It had the same issue as talky where not everyone in the call would be able to connect to eachother. (Especially Lukas and I.)
petermolnara long while ago I thought I'll be a webrtc advocate, but it's been weird and - probably due to codecs and hd/fhd webcam resolutions - way too cpu insensive
petermolnarI'm slowly realizing I'd rather go back to qvga res and the old skype, just please someone get it working easily, reliably and without burning down or drainig the battery in 1 hour of a laptop
ZegnatI imagine clients should be able to let the user pick at what bitrate they want to push their webcam right? They just don’t allow for it most of the time, defaulting to “best possible”, which is both heavy on encoding (CPU) and bandwidth
ZegnatVidyo is enterprise software, AFAIK. It probably cost Mozilla a non-insubstantial sum to get all their conference rooms outfitted. I don’t believe we can set-up a Vidyo conference for IndieWeb just at the snap of our fingers.
sketchessI like the 'old skypes' way better than the new ones. grrrrr they changed it once again. It tries to force me into google or microsoft accouts now.... no thank you, I rather die.
petermolnarthat article of [chrisaldrich] got me thinking that though posts are definitely a problem for filter bubble algorithms maybe events are just as much of a problem, yet event cross-posting is niche even within the indieweb community; I'm guessing mostly because of the lack of tools
aaronpkthey're actually more about testing whether your webmention client can find the webmention endpoint correctly, but if you're sending via telegraph it does that all for you