BrAsS_mOnKeY, fzylogic, jjuran, eli_oat, gRegorLove, [miklb], snarfed, leg, sh4l_, wolftune, jihaisse, AngeloGladding, [chrisaldrich], friedcell, j12t, loicm, KevinMarks, [kevinmarks], KartikPrabhu, j4y_funabashi, Pierre-O, webhat, PFMurph and bignose joined the channel
#sebselI can now see all aaronpk's checkins on a map, all the stickers he unlocked, a list of his mayorships, friends, the number of coins.
#sebselSeems like Swarm now shares a lot more information about you with your friends.
#sebselThat's the kind of privacy where people ARE scared for. They don't care as much about person-to-silo privacy, but they do about person-to-person.
#Zegnatsl007, don’t know what the others versions are. So can’t tell you. But both contain a copyright notice for 2011 by Peter Martischka, so I guess it is the “official” one?
#Zegnatjeremycherfas hope to see you on vHWC then :D
#sl007if it is Node.js I'd have a look into customizing the interface a bit to make it more usable for IWC and enrich w. WebRTC to have a "minimal" livestream option …
#tantek_snarfed++ wow that's some great investigatory work (also upon first skim seems like a lot of good simplifying assumptions/decisions just to get something working!)
#Loqisnarfed has 280 karma in this channel (294 overall)
#tantek_will give it a more thorough read once back in my normal timezone
#tantek_what you haven't seen (and might not) are the two replies I left for that comment that are in moderation. first that links to the template, calls it out for being spam, and encouraes its deletion (and the reply). And the second which says feel free to leave the thread there to help aid in comment spam discoverability.
#gRegorLoveMany spam comments at the end of that github thread too
#tantek_OMS just started reading the comments on that gist. priceless
j12t joined the channel
#tantek_gRegorLove wow that is very odd. like nearly nothing for ~4 years, then spam starting this year?
#tantek_or maybe github only blocks and clears spam accounts once a year?
#KartikPrabhu tantek_: thanks for the link. it has very valuable information. keep up the good work, hope to read more in the future ;)
#tantek_hahaha. just please don't teach Loqi to use that template :)
#tantek_specifically the comment I left on that w3.org blog post which suggests it can/should be deleted once the spam is (since my comment makes no sense out of context)
#Loqi[Bill McCoy] publishing groups workflow diagramThe new Publishing@W3C activity was formed in February 2017 when W3C finalized our combination with IDPF (the International Digital Publishing Forum). Over the last four months there’s been a ton of progress. The n...
#tantek_I doubt anyone else can see it because I can only see it because I'm cookied to see it
#tantek_point is, I have no desire to own a comment that is both in-reply-to something that should be deleted (the spam comment), and suggests deleting it itself
#tantek_I mean, *one* way it *could* make sense is if I posted the comment on my site, POSSE it to that WordPress install, and that WordPress install somehow knew to send "delete-of" responses to comments that were deleted, and my server knew how to handle a delete-of response (from the in-reply-to source), and I set that reply to "ok to autodelete if deleted by the in-reply-to author)
#LoqiAn edit (AKA diff, change) is a special type of reply that indicates a set of suggested changes to the post it is replying to. A collection of (presumably related) suggested edits in open source is often called a patch or pull request https://indieweb.org/edit
#tantek_anyway that's more meta. I suppose I could see owning that kind of comment (heads-up about that spam!) but only after lots more was figured out / implemented (a "delete reply" that a blog post author could send after deleting an accepted webmention reply)
eli_oat, wolftune, strugee, KartikPrabhu and j12t joined the channel
#schmartyBaltimore HWC quiet writing hour has begun! just a few of us.
amz3`, biquillo, arlen, snarfed, [miklb], j12t, j12t_ and [kevinmarks] joined the channel