grantcodes_, hs0ucy and friedcell joined the channel
#ZegnatHere is a thought: I am on a social network of sorts that makes it very hard to export my data/posts. How easy would it be to demand my data from them under EU law instead? Or should I wait for GDPR?
#dgolduntil GPDR, its very much on a case by case basis
#dgoldimplementation of the last Data Directive was very patchy, so in some states the right to data extends only to _personally identifying_ data, so wouldn't apply to social media posts
#ZegnatAah. Cool. So when GDPR actually lands coming May (I believe) it might become a viable option for demanding a copy of our posts on any EU operated silo?
#dgoldwell, yes, but not just on eu operated silos
#dgoldGDPR affects data held _on_ EU citizens, regardless of where the data operator is domiciled
#ZegnatNice. Do you think that is an avenue worth documenting on /export?
#aaronpkIf you try it then document your results for sure!
#ZegnatWe went and asked for export options to be integrated: https://superthread.net/re/26610/ - if no answer comes we will try and request all our data through EU directive and see how they react :)
#dgoldAny information related to a natural person or ‘Data Subject’, that can be used to directly or indirectly identify the person. It can be anything from a name, a photo, an email address, bank details, posts on social networking websites, medical information, or a computer IP address.
#dgoldthat highlighted language was added to the GPDR after sustained lobbying of the EU Commission by Twitter, Facebook et al.
#dgoldThe EuParliament found out about the lobbying, and they demanded that language went in.
[keithjgrant] joined the channel
#ZegnatThat’s a good quote to have! Specifies that, yes, posts are personal information
ancarda joined the channel
#dgoldwell, if you liked that Zegnat, you'll love this (again from the executive summary, so its readable and coherent)
#dgoldPart of the expanded rights of data subjects outlined by the GDPR is the right for data subjects to obtain from the data controller confirmation as to whether or not personal data concerning them is being processed, where and for what purpose.
#dgoldFurther, the controller shall provide a copy of the personal data, free of charge, in an electronic format.
#dgoldoh, and you have the right to obtain that data, and transmit it onwards to another data controller
#ZegnatIn other words, once I have obtained a copy of the data, the data is “mine” to do with as I please?
#dgoldI know that Faecbook, at least, have attempted in the past to stop people reposting data elsewhere, on the basis that it was a violation of their IP
#dgoldthere's a credible case that Facebooks PYMK datasets are subject to GPDR
#ancardaHi everyone, I'm working on a WebMention implementation for my site. It seems like it's a good idea to save all mentions that have been received into a database. Are there any good limits on the length of source, target, and the overall POST body? I'm unsure how big to make the VARCHAR columns
#dgoldFacebook claims this is algorithmically generated data from users, and claims IP over the dataset
#dgoldfrom an EU pov, this dataset is the result of processing personal data uploaded by users, and as such it _might_ be subject to GDPR
#dgoldthe issue is that the dataset isn't merely created from _your_ data, but from other users data, and is introduced into Facebook's hands without your consent
wolftune joined the channel
#Anchakorhmm, what is more interesting to me is if GDPR would allow you federating/copying messages/posts addressed to you, ranging from PMs to discussion threads you participated in
#ZegnatAnchakor, that might be a different issue. Because the other person would own the copyright. And even as part of a data request the silo cannot grant you a right to publish someone else’s IP, I think.
#Anchakorit's a tough issue, because a format of a discussion software usually does disincentivises people for quoting parts of posts they are responding to
#ZegnatYes, but the scope (as it says there under implementation) is basically left up to the different countries completely
#ZegnatI know that I wouldn’t be allowed to quote from a private letter in Sweden for instance. So if you are talking about DMs, that is a no go here.
#Anchakorhow about public posts/discussion? as for DMs couldn't you back them up (from facebook to your own site, but still private to you)?
#ZegnatYes, personal archiving is almost always allowed everywhere, it is publishing that gets you into trouble :)
#ZegnatSweden limits citaträtt to publicly published content, IIRC. Which excludes DMs. If discussions are public, you should be allowed to quote, yes.
#ZegnatBut, yeah, different jurisdictions are going to do different things. At least until the EU also sorts out copyright law once and for all (ha, good luck with that)
#dgoldFair Use is pretty much meaningless in a !US context
#dgoldmuch as the First Amendment has no meaning at all outside the us, despite the best efforts of the silos
#ZegnatI always find it interesting when EU YouTubers talk about Fair Use, parroting whatever US YouTubers said, forgetting they are creating there content on a different continent.