#indieweb 2018-02-25

2018-02-25 UTC
snarfed, eli_oat, tantek, KartikPrabhu, renem, wolftune, cdchapman, [mrkrndvs], unicron, [miklb], Guest25874, AngeloGladding, KapiX, johannh, jeremycherfas, pindonga, electronicmaji, [kevinmarks], bergie, R2ZER0, daf1, oodani, bret, XgF, JasonO, voxpelli, maingo and Salt joined the channel; leg left the channel
#
Loqi
[superfeedr] "The worst possible feedback: it works for me." by Jeremy Cherfas on 2018-02-25 https://stream.jeremycherfas.net/2018/the-worst-possible-feedback-it-works-for-me
#
Zegnat
Good morning IndieWeb
#
sknebel
good morning Zegnat
#
Zegnat
Hellow sknebel :)
#
jeremycherfas
Good moning zegnat and sknebel
#
jeremycherfas
Ooops. Morning!
#
Zegnat
read that as an ’Allo ’Allo “good moaning”
#
jeremycherfas
Yes, that would be a charitable interpretation.
#
Zegnat
Hmm. I am inventing microformats again. Lets look for prior art.
#
jeremycherfas
Speaking of which, I recall a discussion of in-reply-to versus something like comment-on Was that ever resolved?
catsup joined the channel
#
sknebel
hm, I must have missed that
#
Zegnat
As far as the microformats property goes, I think in-reply-to is the defacto default for metadata on an entry when that entry is a reaction to something
#
Zegnat
There was a bit of a discussion not too long ago about how to markup the contents of the in-reply-to though. Someone wanted to add the name of the author in there and was experimenting with h-cite without a title. Maybe you are remembering that?
#
Zegnat
is thinking about embedding h-app inside h-entry for information on how a post was created
#
Zegnat
Both tantek and aaronpk add the information to their posts, Sink also does it. But there is no easy way to extract it from the HTML again.
[mrkrndvs] joined the channel
#
jeremycherfas
Maybe that was it. On the other hand, if in-reply-to is de facto default, I'll stick with that and stop trying to complicate my life
KapiX, Pierre-O, nitot, [mrkrndvs], leg, wladz, loicm, wolftune and snarfed joined the channel