[jgmac1106]"Instead of lecturing people about how they should really be blogging instead of tweetstorming" love that line though I drop the storm reference and like saying threads
petermolnarI have multiple problems with tweetstorms, but nearly all of them is a representation issue: it's infuriating trying to follow with the current twitter interface and whoever wants me to do so is a bad person, and doesn't think about their audience.
ndegruchyTwitter, and particularly: twitter threads, are just doomed to reimplement regular web pages and/or blog posts, poorly. Seriously, just provide either an alterate interface, or just say "Bla bla, my thoughts: <url to actual service that can display text in a non-shit manner>"
ndegruchyI just don't think people are going to give up on Twitter. IndieWeb is a great concept, but people only have a passing interest in owning their own data. They're more than happy to put up with the idiocy because "everyone else uses it".
[tb], schmudde, a_chou and Pierre-O joined the channel
[jgmac1106]anyone that publishes threads probably uses tweetdeck which is better suited for threading, I never check regular twitter unless it is the mobile website
[jgmac1106]A blog post to me is something I plan, I probably with headings, a lede, an overarching story arch, a thread of notes is just that, random thoughts thrown to the wind, sometimes they become blog posts but a blog post would never become a thread of notes
[jgmac1106]so when people say, "Why didn't you just blog that" the answer is basically , "I can't." Whatever thoughts I just threw down simply did not exist until the thread, its thinking outloud in all its messiness not sure any readable alternative exists
petermolnarI genuinely struggle to fail to see the difference of writing a tweetstorm vs using paragraphs in a text file with the strict rule of no backwards editing.
petermolnarI do see how it could be one of those limitations that could help art / "The Enemy of Art Is the Absence of Limitations", Orson Welles / to happen, but it's just not a nice way of posting from a reader perspective.
petermolnarbasically if the format is unfit for the medium - whereas for twitter, the medium is twitter.com, one can't require people to use another service to read it - then why force it?
[jgmac1106]its more than just engagement, we are smarter together, I may have1,000s of followers but really only engage with 20-30. and maybe the performative nature, no it does, influence the genre. like doing improv comedy rather than a set
mayakate[m]I think there are lots of different kinds of readers with lots of different perspectives. Off the top of my head: it's interesting to be able to thread off from a main thread with a digression (https://everythingstudies.com/2020/09/24/notes-on-notes/), it creates an easy way for readers to engage with particular chunks, there are social norms about "hold off on commenting about an error in tweet 2 until you get to the
mayakate[m]bottom to see if they've addressed it" due to rolling publication, you get feedback about which particular details resonated with people since it's common to fave particular tweets in a thread... If it's not for you, it's not for you, but I think it's more interesting to consider what the non-siloed version of a tweet thread would be that *doesn't* resemble a blogpost.
jeremycherfasMany people I follow clearly think long and hard about their threads and are very content to do it that way. Their's are not random scraps of thought. Nothing I say will persuade them to do otherwise.