raucao, schmudde, KempfCreative, KartikPrabhu, ndegruchy, mauz555, dckc and [jgmac1106] joined the channel
#[jgmac1106]"Instead of lecturing people about how they should really be blogging instead of tweetstorming" love that line though I drop the storm reference and like saying threads
#petermolnarI have multiple problems with tweetstorms, but nearly all of them is a representation issue: it's infuriating trying to follow with the current twitter interface and whoever wants me to do so is a bad person, and doesn't think about their audience.
#petermolnarunless they provide a readable alternative.
njha and awolf joined the channel
#ndegruchyTwitter, and particularly: twitter threads, are just doomed to reimplement regular web pages and/or blog posts, poorly. Seriously, just provide either an alterate interface, or just say "Bla bla, my thoughts: <url to actual service that can display text in a non-shit manner>"
Pierre-O joined the channel
#ndegruchyI just don't think people are going to give up on Twitter. IndieWeb is a great concept, but people only have a passing interest in owning their own data. They're more than happy to put up with the idiocy because "everyone else uses it".
[tb], schmudde, a_chou and Pierre-O joined the channel
#[jgmac1106]anyone that publishes threads probably uses tweetdeck which is better suited for threading, I never check regular twitter unless it is the mobile website
#[jgmac1106](because twitter never replaced the mobile tweetedeck version when they bought it). I do add the Better tweetdeck Firefox extension
#[jgmac1106]A blog post to me is something I plan, I probably with headings, a lede, an overarching story arch, a thread of notes is just that, random thoughts thrown to the wind, sometimes they become blog posts but a blog post would never become a thread of notes
#[jgmac1106]so when people say, "Why didn't you just blog that" the answer is basically , "I can't." Whatever thoughts I just threw down simply did not exist until the thread, its thinking outloud in all its messiness not sure any readable alternative exists
[schmarty] joined the channel
#petermolnarI genuinely struggle to fail to see the difference of writing a tweetstorm vs using paragraphs in a text file with the strict rule of no backwards editing.
#aaronpkSame reason people tweet at all I think... engagement
#petermolnarI do see how it could be one of those limitations that could help art / "The Enemy of Art Is the Absence of Limitations", Orson Welles / to happen, but it's just not a nice way of posting from a reader perspective.
#petermolnarbasically if the format is unfit for the medium - whereas for twitter, the medium is twitter.com, one can't require people to use another service to read it - then why force it?
#petermolnareither alter the medium or the format.
toupain, KartikPrabhu, [chrisbergr], nickodd, [pfefferle] and PetriBot joined the channel
#[jgmac1106]its more than just engagement, we are smarter together, I may have1,000s of followers but really only engage with 20-30. and maybe the performative nature, no it does, influence the genre. like doing improv comedy rather than a set
#mayakate[m]I think there are lots of different kinds of readers with lots of different perspectives. Off the top of my head: it's interesting to be able to thread off from a main thread with a digression (https://everythingstudies.com/2020/09/24/notes-on-notes/), it creates an easy way for readers to engage with particular chunks, there are social norms about "hold off on commenting about an error in tweet 2 until you get to the
#mayakate[m]bottom to see if they've addressed it" due to rolling publication, you get feedback about which particular details resonated with people since it's common to fave particular tweets in a thread... If it's not for you, it's not for you, but I think it's more interesting to consider what the non-siloed version of a tweet thread would be that *doesn't* resemble a blogpost.
rmdes joined the channel
#jeremycherfasMany people I follow clearly think long and hard about their threads and are very content to do it that way. Their's are not random scraps of thought. Nothing I say will persuade them to do otherwise.