#indieweb 2021-07-01

2021-07-01 UTC
Seirdy joined the channel
#
bneil
re analytics im using cloudflares and have had a similiar experience as aciccarello. Cloudflare doesn't break down individual page views (at least for the free version). So ive also got clicky.com going which can give those insights.
Kaja_, n8chz, SamSchmitt[m], alex_, justache, chenghiz_, alex11, sebbu, n8chz1, capjamesg, lanodan, Seirdy, hendursaga, jamietanna, samwilson, joshproehl, seekr and [tantek] joined the channel
#
[tantek]
aaronpk, would you consider making those old photos “signed-in” viewable? E.g. visible to anyone who has signed in with IndieAuth
#
[tantek]
on another note, since that was somewhat related to persistence / owning your content or links...
#
[tantek]
longevity << thread about link rot & squat: https://twitter.com/zittrain/status/1395750908349325315
#
@zittrain
With the help of the ace @nytimes digital team, we compiled a list of ~2.2 million externally-facing hyperlinks that had been used in http://nytimes.com articles since its launch in 1996. The goal was to discern how many of them had fallen victim to linkrot or content drift. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E16zyAkWYAEKZc9.png
(twitter.com/_/status/1395750908349325315)
#
aaronpk
yes i would consider it
#
aaronpk
right now i don't have a way to do that though
#
[tantek]
Do we have even have a good name for that kind of broad audience?
#
[tantek]
It’s not an allowlist because there is no list
#
[tantek]
I feel like some folks here already show more on their homepage or profile/about or more posts to folks that are signed in
#
[tantek]
Eg maybe Zegnat? Like his h-card shows more info if you’re signed in? Or maybe I’m imagining that
[snarfed] joined the channel
#
[snarfed]
there’s some silo precedent for this, allowing “any logged in user”
#
GWG
[tantek]: Zegnat wanted to do that for a ticket auth test
#
[tantek]
Snarfed, yeah that sounds familiar
#
[tantek]
I suppose we have:
#
[tantek]
What is a login wall
#
Loqi
login wall (AKA authwall or auth wall) is a UI antipattern used by some silos like Medium to prompt returning users with a login UI, sometimes after some number of viewed pages, that blocks viewing or using the site until the user has logged in https://indieweb.org/login_wall
#
[tantek]
Does that sound like the same thing? Or should we have something distinct for an “IndieAuth wall”?
#
[tantek]
Though I’d prefer to frame it positively, focusing on what it enables, rather than as a limitation / barrier / who is blocked
KartikPrabhu joined the channel
#
[snarfed]
seems like the same thing
gRegor, [schmarty] and [jacky] joined the channel
#
[jacky]
looks like no one mentioned the Twitter Close Friends function yet
n8chz1 joined the channel
#
[jacky]
was looking for the link again lol
#
[jacky]
also randomly learned that most libraries give you gifted access to the NYT!
#
[jacky]
also some interesting UX on how to help compose more 'friendly' replies https://twitter.com/a_dsgnr/status/1410690519710060544
#
@a_dsgnr
Here’s how it’d work: • Authors choose the phrases they prefer not to see • These phrases are highlighted as ppl write replies; ppl can learn why, or ignore the guidance • Authors can enable automatic actions, like moving violating replies to the bottom of the convo https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E5PHjSmVEAEEQOI.jpg
(twitter.com/_/status/1410690519710060544)
#
[jacky]
I think the second tweet about having people say "this is what I don't want to see in my replies" and then the reader understanding that to then surface these hints is a interesting thing
#
[jacky]
I don't know how to wrangle that into the IndieWeb world but we kind of tell people our 'preferences' already by the information we markup on our sites
Moosadee joined the channel
#
[tantek]
that's a whole lot of defensive labor, feels like the wrong place to put the work
#
[tantek]
even the cognitive load/labor of having to come up with "what I don't want to see in my replies" makes me go ugh
[KevinMarks] joined the channel
#
[jacky]
that could be primed from one's past content tbh
#
[tantek]
seeded from past reported content maybe
#
[jacky]
yup! and like if you have a blocklist already, it could look at engagement it had with you in the past that's publicly available (that's a big IF tbh) or engagement you have stored still (I wonder if the Twitter export would show this) and go from there
#
[tantek]
I mean I'm likely going to have to write up a bunch of filters for stuff like this for my years of backqueued webmentions via Bridgy backfeed from Twitter anyway
#
[tantek]
though that's more of a dev chat
samwilson, [Murray], [aciccarello] and gRegor joined the channel