#LoqiIt looks like we don't have a page for "use case for undelete" yet. Would you like to create it? (Or just say "use case for undelete is ____", a sentence describing the term)
#capjamesg[d]I saw it in the spec but wondered if anyone has any thoughts on use cases.
#[grantcodes]Its usefulness mostly depends on if your website permanently deletes content or marks content as "deleted" and hides it somehow. Seems like something that would be rarely used, but useful if you accidentally delete something 😛
Moosadee, [manton], jacky, gxt, [snarfed], alex11 and n8chz1 joined the channel
#[tantek]yes a forgiving UI should allow undeleting, similar to unsending
shoesNsocks joined the channel
#capjamesg[d]tantek I actually saw a blog post of yours on this.
#capjamesg[d]About CRUD and how undelete should be part of it.
#[tantek]capjamesg[d] yeah, in general the ability to undo actions in the UI is key to a forgiving (read: less anxiety-inducing) UI
#[tantek]and in many (most?) cases, that UI support requires explicitly different handling under the covers at the protocol level
Rattroupe joined the channel
#jackythe UI can provide that [un-deleting] but if the server doesn't, should it be emulated somehow?
#jackythinks not because that could be very misleading
#[tantek]since the brainstorming about that is more dev-related I'll answer there
shoesNsocks joined the channel
#capjamesg[d]tantek that makes sense. It is not too difficult to implement because I don't delete files on the endpoint, only on GitHub. So I can restore them later.
jacky, KartikPrabhu, mutandis, tetov-irc and Seirdy joined the channel; kir0ul left the channel