[timothy_chambe]I wanted to do an update and two requests about the Mastodon instance I created focused on the Indieweb, named indieweb.social. It's been live for well over a year and grew in part out of discussions in this slack group.
[timothy_chambe]The mission statement for that was to be place where we could evangelize Indieweb tech and ideas to the #Fediverse, as well as engage and see where ideas from that area could gel with IndieWeb and related efforts. This instance was a place to intentionally cross those two streams of Indieweb and Fediverse development and thinking.
[timothy_chambe] We have had 1.2 thousand people create their Mastodon accounts on this instance. Many many more reading content federated out from this site. You can browse those here: https://indieweb.social/explore
[timothy_chambe]As an instance of users, we've created a lot of Indieweb and related posts there. And we repost "This Week in Inidieweb" to the group as regular posts.
[timothy_chambe]My first request: is there places in the IndieWeb Wiki that this can be featured? Any placement in the wiki or in any emails would be very appreciated.
[timothy_chambe]Second Request: we try to encourage folks there to follow any IndieWeb thought leaders that POSSE and syndicate out their accounts to Mastodon.
LoqiMastodon is an open source social network project that supports some IndieWeb building blocks like microformats2 & rel-me, and has a federation of many instances, including https://indieweb.social/ for IndieWeb fans https://indieweb.org/Mastodon
[jeremycherfas][chrisaldrich] My latest newsletter featured an amazing story of 200 pages of a lost 13th century Arabic cookbook being discovered in the British Library in a 15th century book on pharmacology.
[snarfed]1I'd like to think so too! but by the numbers, the majority of IndieWeb users don't run their own server. they're on micro.blog, or wordpress.com, or similar
[snarfed]1other relevant numbers: Bridgy Fed launched 4y ago but only 111 people (domains) have ever used it. Mastodon support in normal Bridgy has only been around half as long, launched 2y ago, but has 344 users, 3x as many
[timothy_chambe]↩️ It's a network of about 4 million distributed instances, a lot like Twitter but with rougher edges technically. I've found good tech discussions and it is maybe the most used truly decentralized social effort to date, but that is a small pool. I am intersted in it from ActivityPub standpoint.
[fluffy]↩️ [timothy_chambe] just so you know, slack threads aren't supported on the various other chat interfaces, so their use is strongly discouraged.
@m_olderBecause of moving and new jobs and so on, I've had to do a lot of paperwork and identification stuff lately, and it keeps bringing me back to Seeing Like a State and how desperately governments try to pin down something as slippery as identity. (twitter.com/_/status/1450474094357532672)
n8chz, jonnybarnes, delirium and KartikPrabhu joined the channel
[tantek]thankfully the use-case I have is more easily solved with asking a different question: does this reply have any literal @-names, if not, then don't POSSE to Twitter