[tantek]aaronpk, could you automate it as in if the *tweet* you are favoriting/liking/bookmarking has a reply from the same author, then treat it as a tweetstorm and download/cache the entire thing
[tantek]or a slightly user-sloppier (yet easier to implement) solution would be: if the tweet you are favoriting/liking/bookmarking *is* a reply to a tweet from the same author, then treat it as a tweet storm and download/cache the entire thing from the first tweet from that author upthread.
[tantek]haha aaronpk, new Loqi adjustment for that, if someone is apologizing for dev and asking to take it there, make it a "Thank you" acknowledgment instead of "Take it to dev"
[jgmac1106]I have 100% done that multiple times and turned threads into articles, not sure what tool I used but the process was source code>tidy html>insert stuff into classes to allow the content to get shared easy
[jgmac1106]If my blog wasn't borked I could probably find the posts talking about it. I am pretty sure I would just coopy and paste, then clean up ThreaderApp..remove facepiles and such
[tantek]your experience with your blogging setup [jgmac1106] is making me think that the very first feature to add to blogging software before releasing/giving it to someone else to use is an easy & fast *export* feature, so that if for some reason something goes wrong, you haven't burdened that other person with having to contact you to "escape" / migrate
[jgmac1106]but at a loss with my Known site, going to have to pay someone to literally sit there and load ten pages at a time and copy and paste...manual until it hurts hurts most when you pay for it
[tantek]The statement that we've often seen (I think most recently prominently from Moxie in his web3 deconstruction) of "nobody wants to run a server" is both provably false and the wrong conclusion.
[tantek]No, everybody is already running servers, in their pockets, and in their homes. It's more like nobody wants to run (and administer) an Apache server.
[tantek]I think this is a very important distinction to understand for both existing IndieWeb folks, and frankly, for IndieWeb-interested folks who see "running an [Apache/nginx] server" as a barrier
[tantek]actually that's exactly the problem. too many basics of "getting on the IndieWeb" (outside of a turnkey service like Micro.blog) require being a dev
[jgmac1106]I tiny onprem or cloud server with RBAC attached to each local library. people can come in and check out a subdomain and get some containerized space on that server
[jgmac1106]there is a dark side to just giving people cPanel and server space, we leave a lot of vulnerabilities all over the place without the skills to mantain
[tantek]Apple and Google have taught us that with the right UI, people are able to manage installing/deleting apps. all the cPanel/Installotron whatever stuff just sucks in comparison and has neglected evolving their UX in comparison
aaronpkit would be magical if getting your own website was as easy as downloading an app. the trick is making that work in a way that isn't also tied to a walled garden like the app store
[tonz]ooh that is good news. Took their time though. A French judge previously already tossed out IAB in 2018, and then Belgium did the same last year. I’m glad to see that the legal team on this are people I’ve done open government data work with in the past.