#[tw2113_Slack_][timothy_chambe] how are the mastodon numbers today?
[timothy_chambe] joined the channel
#[timothy_chambe]↩️ At Indieweb social: we are seeing a very big spike...
#[timothy_chambe]At the Mastodon/Fediverse overall: think it will take a day or two to tell... but the most prominent Mastadon instance mastodon.social maintained uptime, (with some slowness at tmes) but was clearly was being hammered by traffic...
#[timothy_chambe]I'll say this, #POSSE strategies feeling a good deal more wise today.
#[chrisaldrich]I know there used to be a gateway for Twitter quitters to find/follow their friends on Mastodon, but I think it "broke" with API changes. Is there a newer way anyone has used lately that works for finding and discovering your social connections?
#aaronpki will say i'm pretty happy i am in no rush to download my twitter data because twitter has been a shadow copy of everything i post on my site for years now
#Loqiaaronpk has 14 karma in this channel over the last year (138 in all channels)
#petermolnarI'd love to know if twitter was to actually shut down, temporarily or longer, how many people would actually consider it a loss after a few weeks
#ZegnatGreat example of /collection, I guess? Would The Verge be a “Silo Example” though? The Verge does not sound like a silo.
cybi joined the channel
#IWDiscordGateway<marksuth> It looks like Apple have pulled indigenous from the App Store as part of them removing older apps. I really need to crack on with getting IndiePass sorted
#AramZ-S[m]It's not a totally innocent or coincidental move. A little while back Google started supporting a metadata structure for live updating pages along with better crawling support and a badge that can show up on Google News so it is also an SEO strategy, especially for news sites.
#ZegnatThat WP article seems to be heavily paywalled for me so I can’t see the effect of it AramZ-S[m] :(
#ZegnatEarlier I have mostly seen news pages do live blogs where they do live updates of an article, I think this one from The Verge stood out to me specifically because it linked to separate articles with separate URLs.
#ZegnatThat seems to be different from LiveBlogPosting in that it is not specifically that one page that contains the updates
#AramZ-S[m]Yeah, I think that is a typical pattern, though I agreee the Verge's version is more clearly a feed of posts than others which usually (like WashPost does) have larger story updates on the single page and a smaller link to another post. (Sorry about the paywall!)
#lkhrs[m]Ash McAllan: I'm actually playing with the idea of moving back to WordPress from Hugo at some point, haha. MicroBlog is appealing though.
#AshMcAllan[m]WordPress ain't bad for what it is but I have a habit of disliking things that are more than they need to be which WordPress is for me personally
#AshMcAllan[m]Also there's something alluringly self destructive about the idea of getting rid of all my old crufty posts
#lkhrs[m]oh it's a such a good feeling to clean all that stuff up, I recently purged about a hundred posts from my blog
#[KevinMarks]I did like your webmentions/salmentions implementation though
#AramZ-S[m]Yeah, the rel prop is sadly underused and t/f tends to be undersupported. Mby we'll see Mastodon's push towards using it have some impact with greater support.
#AshMcAllan[m]<[KevinMarks]> "I did like your webmentions/..." <- Oh if I switch to microblog.pub I'll absolutely be hacking it to support salmentions
#AramZ-S[m]I don't know microblog, but I have been interested in doing webmentions on my static site generator-built sites. Do you know if there are good example implimentation, esp in Node, I could look at @[Ash McAllan] ?
#[tantek]AramZ-S[m], happy to answer more about static site how tos in the #indieweb-dev channel (since setting up SSGs with features like that still fairly dev-heavy)
#[tantek][KevinMarks] re: that Twittereng / rel me tweet, why did you link to the Bluesky talk tweet with the image inside? DID is not even close to an interoperable format. Concerned that somehow the bluesky folks haven't figured that out and/or are hosting a talk on that?
#[tantek]I.e. DIDs from one "controller" don't interoperate with another, so yet again, a user of a DID from one company is "stuck" with that company, no better than a social media profile and using it to OAuth into other places
#[KevinMarks]The event is this Friday and it's me and DID peeps. So I can make that case.
cybi, gerben, strugee and barnaby joined the channel
#[tantek]Oops I brought up #indieweb-dev stuff, my bad
ehmry and danicotillas joined the channel
#[tantek]Has anyone else heard of the phenomenon of "shadow sites"? This seems like especially a challenge for the IndieWeb, as if some "BigCorp" can hire a team to make clones/simulacra of "official sites" using their own domain names, then it's a vulnerability that everyone with a personal site shares. e.g. Lieferando supposedly did this (does this?) by registering 120,000 domains in Europe alone:
#[tantek]The website *looks* like an official restaurant website, and with a domain name accordingly as well
#[tantek]of course the favicon is a sloppy giveaway (since it's the Lieferando logo)
#[tantek]I kinda want to define "shadow site" as a thing on the wiki, since it does seem to be a threat to IndieWeb sites, even if primarily business (for now).
#barnabyoh that’s bizarre. it could also explain some of the bizarre issues I’ve seen with local restaurants websites and domains
#sknebelyeah, they do this. I have an in-progress project to hunt those down in openstreetmap data
#[tantek]presumably someone dedicated enough could pay some SEO agency or whatever to setup a shadow site of a personal site as a method of harassment / person-in-the-middle attacking you
#[aciccarello]I know google was auto-generating websites for some businesses from maps data but those were presumably only ones without a website.
#sknebelI guess a person-equivalent sort of are these sites that scrape profiles on GH etc and generate pages from that, although they dont go to custom domains...
#[aciccarello]Registering 120,000 domain names is a lot!
#barnabyanyone know if they can negotiate some sort of bulk deal with registrars? or are they paying 120,000 x ~12€ a year for these domains
#AramZ-S[m]They prob can. I own too many domain names and it prob isn't even 100 and my registrar was already offering me a bulk deal
#barnabyI guess each one only has to lead to a couple of orders per year for them to make it back anyway
#AramZ-S[m]It depends on what they do and how deeply they do it. :/ a lot of them are not doing anything that is strictly illegal. A lot will rip off news sites but do so as indirectly as possible so it isn't actually breaking the laws.
#AramZ-S[m]Yeah, I mostly try not to link to the actual real bad stuff. Though the poor blogger who got photos of his leg hijacked for an ad campaign for a scam is pretty bad, though more on the sad side than anything else.
#AramZ-S[m]The whole scam of a lot of these is to build realistic looking links to each other so linking to them just gives them what they want
#AramZ-S[m]And there is a whole universe of grey and blackhat SEO site types. Shadow Sites, "Private Blog Networks", arbitrage sites, click launderers, and fake search sites.
#AramZ-S[m]@[tantek]:libera.chat Lemmie know if you put up a page and I'd be glad to add detail.
#[tantek]AramZ-S[m] what is the more common term, "shadow site" or "shadow website", and does the capitalization matter? It seems more descriptive than a proper noun
#AramZ-S[m]I guess "shadow websites" no capitalization works best and is clearest.
#[tantek](because that's only one citation/article, and you seem like you have read (and written?) many more articles about this phenomenon)
#AramZ-S[m]Or at least Twitter threads haha. I dunno I think prob the most commonly used and referred to term is just the more general "fake websites" or "fake sites" and maybe that makes more sense plus subtopics underneath on terms like shadow sites and private blog networks. And for clarity's sake prob "fake websites" or "shadow websites" are the easiest. It's hardly a term of art at this point, in that article's case they are intentionally using
#AramZ-S[m]a term specifically relevant to resteraunt websites b/c it references "shadow kitchens".
#[tantek]the "shadow" aspect indicates fake version of something still real so that's a useful adjective.
#Loqizombie is in the context of the web a website that had died (site-deaths), perhaps due to domain registration neglect, and has been brought back by some other looking sorta like it did before, but oddly broken, often with spam pages/links added, and eats a lot of CPU likely due to abusive scripts https://indieweb.org/zombie
#AramZ-S[m]Yeah, that's a good one! I guess the question is how far does it differ from the original 'real' site and still be considered a shadow? The semi-cloned news websites are clearly just scrambling text they pull after crawling pages listed in the feeds but they're not quite as directly a shadow of the news site they are ripping off, even if sometimes that is all they do
cybi and tetov-irc joined the channel
#[tantek]I'd say there's a solid expectation that the casual viewer would think it's the original entity, e.g. https://www.secretgardenberlin-vegansushi.de/ looks like a legit indie restaurant site (except for the favicon lol)
#[tantek]I've also seen something like what you're talking about, with random WordPress sites setup with a generic theme pulling in content from other sites in order to try to get a higher ranking for the subject matter, yet without trying to actually "clone" the look of the original
#[tantek]these are more of a variant of spam websites IMO