#johnthewebwhat are some interesting things to write about on your personal website?
#johnthewebI imagine a website you could just go through very conveniently, very fast, like social media, but for a personal website, or like a hub of personal websites, i can go through, spread over different networks, does something like that exist?
#tyilWrite about things you think is interesting, its your personal website
#johnthewebSo there is this decentralisation element, while maintaining speed of scrolling, like in some app, that would be cool
tPoltergeist, burley, gRegor, [aciccarello], [benatwork], [Ana_R], IWSlackGateway, [Joe_Crawford], [tantek], [KevinMarks], [benji], [qubyte], [Murray] and [jeremycherfas] joined the channel
#LoqiA social reader is a modern interactive reader that allows you to directly respond to posts (with a like, comment, etc) right there inline with posts as you read them (as people do in social media), in contrast to legacy feed readers which were one-way read-only experiences and provided no mechanisms to interact with or respond to posts https://indieweb.org/social_readers
#dostoynikovI am planning to change the whole design and getting my own full domain soon. Also planning to post more. I'm trying to get some discipline 🙂
burley, bterry1, [Jo], thierrymarianne, risingspiral, jacky, mahboubine, rvalue, [tantek], ShockTohp, jonnybarnes and [keithjgrant] joined the channel
#[keithjgrant]does anybody post both shares AND bookmarks, or do most folks do just one? I'm curious how everyone distinguish the two. They feel largely redundant to me
#Loqishare is a watered down verb that's used on the "social web" (and other platforms like Google's Android) to mean pretty much any action https://indieweb.org/share
#aaronpki actually have no idea what you mean by posting a share
#[keithjgrant]but my bookmark ended of that post ended up in it's own category
#aaronpkhm, if i look through that list it seems like those are mastodon reposts
#aaronpki don't know why you'd call reposts/retoots/whatever "shares" but maybe because retoot sounds silly
#aaronpkbut yeah it looks like if someone is on mastodon and clicks repost, that shows up in his "shares" list
#[keithjgrant]So I guess my real question is, which post type most closely resembles that same intention? The term "bookmark" to me more implies I'm marking it for my own personal use, and less a "here's something interesting" followers might want to see
jacky joined the channel
#aaronpkthere are actually two separate things in this particular case, but i think he's showing them the same
#aaronpkbridgy sends webmentions for likes/reposts of the note to both the note and the article, because the mastodon reposts do include a link to the article
#aaronpkso the mastodon interactions are not reposts of the article itself, so maybe you could call those "shares", tho i think we use the term "mention" more often
#[tantek]I think you have to start with asking *why* you want to post "something interesting" followers might want to see
#[tantek]And tbh the dynamics around those motivations can (sometimes, often) be counterproductive, and why for example http://micro.blog doesn't have a retweet button
#[tantek]capjamesg, your post about 100 things to do your personal site are a refreshing reminder and encouragement to be creative on your personal site, and not just regurgitate (repost) someone else's post
#[tantek]every mention you have of the word "share" is in the context of something you create, even "just" a list of other things, which presumably you've still implicitly curated, involves conscious thinking & decisions
#rrixgood UGT indiewebbers,,, i wasn't planning on doing a hard-cutover on it quite yet but i accidentally forced myself to launch the new version of my org-mode document/site engine last week, the latest iteration past a static site generator i demonstrated at an SF HWC what feels like ages ago -> https://engine.arcology.garden/
#rrixthis iteration is to eventually be packaged up for others to use, but it's still "literate programming" with the python&rust driving the site situated within well-documented org-mode files that it can self-host and others can read to understand or crib from https://engine.arcology.garden/webserver
#Loqihey rrix: it seems like this conversation is more appropriate for #indieweb-dev (site generator, static site generator, Python)
#[aciccarello]I recently started working on backfilling my Tweets from the archive I downloaded a year ago. It's brought up some interesting questions about what I want to have on my site and how to show it.
#[aciccarello]For example, I'm thinking I won't include any retweets or likes. I don't think I care enough about that content to add it.
#[aciccarello]But figuring out how I want to handle quote tweets will require some thought.
bret_ joined the channel
#[tantek]aciccarello, appreciate the thought process
#lazcorpto2ds - I know, I just replied to the blogpost by capjamesg with a suggestion for the list (and a hint as to what I've just done)
#capjamesgNever worry about not doing something with your site, though! There have been many weeks where I have done nothing on my website. Last year, I took a ~1 month break from doing anything. I have taken longer breaks in the past, too.
#lazcorpIt's something I started on weeks ago, so tomorrow's HWC gave me the impetus to finish it
#[Joe_Crawford]On my calendar I have a recurring event (every 23 days) "Revisit Blog Drafts" - long enough to not feel too bad about declaring bankruptcy on a would-be post.
to2ds joined the channel
#to2ds[Joe_Crawford] - Might try the 23 days approach too.
#gRegorI don't have a great setup for drafts on my site currently, so been experimenting with jotting notes down in Obsidian more. Seems to work slightly better for me so far.
#[tantek]I dislike the bankruptcy metaphor. Too bank-centric
#to2dsI find the digital garden approach appealing with respect to drafts.
#[Joe_Crawford]One thing Tantek brings up periodically is sparking joy - and an excess of drafts undone definitely can induce feelings of failure that are the opposite of joy.
#Loqijoy is a good motivator and focus for making things for your own website, and is something the IndieWeb community encourages people to prioritize and pursue with their IndieWeb projects, and deprioritize (or automate) things that do not bring them joy https://indieweb.org/joy