#petermolnartantek: 'lightweight markup languages' could also be called 'a special hell'; I'm now summarizing what I'd like to see in one and it appears none has all the functions
#Loqipetermolnar: tantek left you a message 4 hours, 47 minutes ago: re: accepting patches via webmention, see https://indieweb.org/edit and add more thoughts to Brainstorming!
#petermolnarthey either sacrifice readability for features or just lack features
#tantekpetermolnar, IMO as soon as they sacrifice readability they cease to become lightweight
#voxpellipetermolnar: I think that if you click the "minor edit" button when you edit then the edit won't show here, in case you want to avoid having eveyrhting show up here ;)
#petermolnar!tell tantek I'm trying to write a regex, that could match /em/ text, but not URLs and would allow /em text with / inside/ and I'm failing, especially when a text contains relative urls; maybe this is the reason why em is represented by another char in most syntaxes?
#GWGben_thatmustbeme: Works, but returns an error and doesn't classify as a like. https://tiny.n9n.us/
#GWGben_thatmustbeme: Some of this may be Micropub for WordPress, but it still shouldn't return an error.
#ben_thatmustbemeyeah, probably. I just don't have time to work on it now. I was trying to keep mobilepub up to the latest micropub spec, so it could be some incompatibility in that. by the way, setting up your own copy of mobilepub is literally just tossing it on to anywhere that renders php and setting up one config file
#ben_thatmustbemei had some testing stuff but never actually added anything
#GWGWait...I store the object you sent in an array.
#GWGMicropub Data: a:1:{s:8:"micropub";s:8:"endpoint";} a:6:{s:7:"mp-type";s:4:"note";s:1:"h";s:5:"entry";s:9:"mp-action";s:6:"create";s:7:"content";s:12:"I like this?";s:7:"like-of";s:27:"http://voxpelli.com/social/";s:9:"published";s:25:"2016-07-22T11:29:50-04:00";}"
#GWGben_thatmustIf it is a like...why is mb-type set as a note?
#voxpelliGWG: I think mp-type is a non-standard attribute that ben_thatmustbeme has added
#GWGvoxpelli: It is...but Micropub for WordPress was pre-draft standard and does recognize the attempt to set an explicit type...otherwise it does implicit.
#Loqiaaronpk: voxpelli left you a message 40 minutes ago: Loqi seems to be partially dead – doesn't respond to "What is *?" and doesn't import tweets?
#LoqiA reply (or comment) is a kind of post that is a text (typically, though photos are possible too) response to some other post, that makes little or no sense without reading or at least knowing the context of the source post https://indieweb.org/reply
#Loqi[Chris Aldrich] Sharing from the #IndieWeb on Mobile (Android) with Apps and @WithKnown
4 min read
I've been doing some work to find a better, easier, and cleaner way to share content, lik...
#aaronpkthe core IRC process is in Ruby, and that's on my server. most of the functionality is in a small API also running on that server but written in PHP
#aaronpkbut I could definitely write a Lambda function and add that as a web hook
#aaronpkthe memes are from a different API, written in Ruby
#Loqitantek: petermolnar left you a message 5 hours, 32 minutes ago: I'm trying to write a regex, that could match /em/ text, but not URLs and would allow /em text with / inside/ and I'm failing, especially when a text contains relative urls; maybe this is the reason why em is represented by another char in most syntaxes?
#tantek(I thought for sure I had actually posted about explicitly using that syntax, but I can't find any explicit post about it, it's like I just started doing it, probably because I'd seen it somewhere)
#ben_thatmustbemegwg, you are correct, there is currently no check to set explicit type for like
#GWGben_thatmustbeme: But you do set it for note? Why not just leave it unset?
#tantekno need for explicit type for like because presence of "like-of" is enough for that
#GWGben_thatmustbeme: I was thinking the other way. Remove it and only add it if necessary.
#tantekre: checkin, I think aaronpk has convinced me it is a different enough "thing" to deserve either its own property or perhaps even its own top level explicit object (e.g. like events have h-event, and interestingly, a checkin is very similar to an event)
#GWGtantek: That was what I was proposing. The way my code is set up, an explicit type always overrides an implicit type, on the theory of intent of the user. But in ben's case, it isn't the type he intended.
#aaronpksidenote: I can't wait to figure this out cause then I will be able to finally add checkins to my site
#ben_thatmustbemeif he should do checkins as an explicit type or not
#aaronpkyeah it's blocking me for implementing checkins, but adding checkins is also a pretty significant amount of work so I can't jump right into it right now anyway
#tantekben_thatmust: it's not either or, there are more options
#ben_thatmustbemei believe he was debating that when he was rewriting his site at IWC MIT 2015