#Zegnatcweiske, any source? Self-hosted is still a thing they talk about on MDN
#sknebelI think 48 and later won't have a switch to turn off the signature check anymore, but I can't find anything about any version being limited to the store only
#ZegnatYeah. And it is signed. I just confirmed. The download I can access on AMO gives me a file with the same md5sum as the XPI in the GitHub repo
#ZegnatBut when I downloaded the XPI on my phone from AMO it worked, from GitHub it was blocked. So it does feel like an origin base check
#ZegnatI don’t really like what they are doing to browser extensions :( Firefox now requires signing by Mozilla, Safari requires you to pay for a developer certificate...
#ZegnatI will probably get the source to my extension up tomorrow - with in browser rel verification. It correctly resolves redirects now (pages linking to kevinmarks.com without www. came up verified) but there still seem to be some differences between it and indiewebify
#ZegnatTwitter still doesn’t resolve. The t.co URL gives a 200, not a 30* redirect.
#ben_thatmustbemeactually, if I had an ability to discover server version string or something i could use that and this to auto-configure the micropub client for the person
#cweiskeben_thatmustbeme, are you building a new micropub client?
#ZegnatCORS should not be a problem, sknebel. My fetching happens in a background script, which means I can always fetch from any domain
#sknebelZegnat: wasn't sure, that's why I mentioned it
#KevinMarks_Were you able to see all the urls it redirects through?
#KevinMarks_I think that's legitimate if it's on the redirection path
#ZegnatI haven’t checked, KevinMarks_. Because I get the final URL back really easy so I went with that
#ZegnatAah. Alright. Sounds like I have some work left to do on the redirect resolving then ;)
#KevinMarks_That will help with www vs bare and other redirects
#ZegnatI am “borrowing” your SVGs, KevinMarks_. Can I assume those to be CC0?
#Zegnat(Want to ask before I go an release the source tomorrow.)
#KevinMarks_Yes, they're cc0 or apache or whatever yes
#KevinMarks_I was thinking we could add a grey tick if it links back but has no rel-me
#cweiskehm. known doesn't care if I send content or content[html]; it automatically detects if its html
#Zegnatcweiske, is that wrong? People submitting Markdown might do so as content and that can contain HTML as well. I don’t think content MUST be plain text?
#cweiskeand that gets interpreted as html, but shouldn#t
#ZegnatHmm. So if I am using Markdown or Wiki-Markup or something that allows for intermingled HTML, it can’t go in content= ?
#aaronpkwell if you write your own server, you can ultimately decide to do whatever you want. but clients will be expecting they are sending you plaintext content
#aaronpkyou *can* make that work, but you're going to have to handle the edge cases and failure modes yourself, and may lead to some unexpected results
#aaronpkrhiaro sometimes uses my micropub clients to edit YAML blocks so... you know
#voxpellitransforms the html to markdown to get his markdown
#cweiskeso user writes markdown -> client converts markdown to html -> sends to MP endpoint -> endpoint converts HTML to markdown -> saves into git -> static site generator converts markdown to html
#tantekthat makes me wonder, since I'm considering publishing a u-uid WITHOUT slug, and I publish a u-url WITH slug, could slug be implied ?
#tantek(the point of the u-uid without slug is for readers to assert uniqueness on the post even if/when I change the slug)
#tantek(also helps with /deleted posts - only have to keep the u-uid in the u-url, and can dump the slug completely as part of deleting all content of the post)
#aaronpkI don't think anybody should be parsing the path of URLs
#tanteksure, I'm trying to see if establishing a pattern would help in the future
#aaronpkwhat's the value of implying the slug based on string matching uid vs url?
#tantekI think the "slug is part of the id" approach will die over time, as more folks admit that the slug is or should bepart of user-editable content of the post
#aaronpkwordpress has a unique ID for each post, and the slug can be used in the URL
#aaronpkif you edit the slug, it keeps the history and redirects the old slug to the new slug
#aaronpkwordpress' "rel=shortlink" sometimes links to the integer ID version