#Loqireacji is an emoji reaction, the use of a single emoji character in response to a post, introduced as a feature by Slack[1] https://indieweb.org/reacji
#[miklb]so, a like :thumbsup: from FB is a like-of but any other reactions are just single emoji replies? Am I following that correctly?
#[tantek]Via Bridgy backfeed? Yes that sounds right.
#[miklb]I’m aiming to add support in WordPress via a plugin.
#[miklb]I posted this in #wordpress but it’s probably general enough if anyone has thoughts: If I’m doing the reacji thing, and I filter all incoming replies for single emoji, I should just save it with commentmeta, with the short_name or the whole array?
#[tantek]Great question. Hence I was wondering who else is displaying reacjis and how
#[tantek]Figuring they have an answer for how to store them
tantek joined the channel
#[miklb]the answer to my question I believe is the whole array as will need to be able to also query skin_tone. I hadn’t scrolled far enough down to see that is also included.
#aaronpkEmoji are weird and honestly I'd just store the raw bytes and hope that OSs can always continue to render them
#aaronpkYou want to consider skin tone variations as the same emoji?
#aaronpkYou could find the skin tone and other variation bytes and remove those
#[miklb]so my thinking was if I store the short name and skin tone, I can create arrays of all the short name and then to do a facepile, then loop through each one and a loop through an array of the skin tones for that emoji.
#[miklb]I wasn’t planning to to consider them all the same.
#[miklb]specifically, the array output when checking the is_single_emoji
tbbrown joined the channel
#tantekaaronpk, it appears I'm sending a "hub.url" param in my websub POST notification instead of a "hub.topic" param
#tantek(inspecting my code). and websub.rocks didn't complain (either about presence of hub.url or absence of hub.topic)
#tantekseems to be ok per spec? that is, nothing against submitting hub.url, and nothing in the spec says how or why a publisher should set hub.topic
#tantekso I'm having trouble understanding how to answer the last question of the implementation report: "If your publisher uses an external hub, please describe how the publisher notifies the hub of new content:" - or rather, what's a good / the right answer? do I need to change my code to say hub.topic instead of hub.url?
#tantekother than that I have an implementation report ready to commit
#jeremycherfasCan you see any reason why the links on this page https://www.jeremycherfas.net/blog do not seem to be operating correctly. I’ve checked the source, and they look to me to be correctly formed. But they just don’t work.
#cweiskeactually, the next list-item already covers the previous content
#jeremycherfasSo it is the size of the H1 div, and it is on top of the posts, but transparent?
#cweiskebecause the list-blog-padding has a float:left
#Zegnatjeremycherfas: you can open the inspector in your browser, and use the element picker. When you then try to hover the links you will see it highlighting a different element, because that is on top
#jeremycherfasOK. Thanks a bunch. It was driving me crazy, but now it should be easy enough to fix.
#jeremycherfasZegnat: I thought that was just me being inaccurate in where the mouse was !
#cweiskeif you remove that float:left from list-blog-padding it works again
j12t joined the channel
#cweiskethere is also another problem on your site:
#Zegnatand cweiske’s fix works for me too, removing the float:left :)
#jeremycherfasOh yes. I see that now. Guess I better fix that too.
#jeremycherfasThanks, both. It is silly how the little things are so hard to see.
#ZegnatAlso an experience thing, jeremycherfas. When I use the element picker and it is finicky I know there is a CSS problem, I know that because of experience. If not for experience I might also have thought it was me using it wrong or pointing my mouse wrong, and then spending hours looking the wrong way.
#sknebelZegnat: due to the redirect on my homepage
#sknebelThe algorithm used the URL that was fetched, not the URL the redirect ends up at
#ZegnatAah. So the question becomes if the algo should match against resolved (after redirect) URL or the URL mentioned in the author property?
j12t joined the channel
#jeremycherfasFixed both those things, and while I was about it updated pure.css
#sknebelZegnat: yes (or both or all steps inbetween or ...) - my site should work with 7.3 as well, that's why I was surprised it triggered 7.2 already
barpthewire joined the channel
#sknebelI remember with some crawling project that also caused issues (is it an authorative h-card or not?). I probably should just not redirect that page (although ability to deal with redirects also might be useful for http->https
#ZegnatNot a bad idea to incorporate rules for redirects
#ZegnatI just haven’t seen it go wrong because of it yet
#jeremycherfasThis is disappointing. A spammer has evaded my honeypot field, probably by being a human being. There must be another way to keep bad things at bay without inconveniencing genuine people.
#ZegnatNot if the spammers are human beings. Unless you filter on content with an actual spam filter
#jeremycherfasI accept the need to be active myself if there are human beings at work. Unfortunately, the Grav plugin has no moderation facilities. Except, probably, editing the datafile directly. Which is a pain.
#jeremycherfasI gave up on that plugin in the end to use voxpelli’s heorku app, and there is no problem, so far, with webmentions. It is “ordinary” comments that are giving me a problem.
#jeremycherfasYou have also reminded me that I need to think about a little script to allow people to submit the URL of a comment or reply on their own site.
#tantekthe WebSub spec only mentions hub.topic now, not hub.url. so I'm wondering if I have to switch to using hub.topic to be compliant / interop with future potential hub implementations
#tantekaaronpk, as a publisher then I feel like I don't know what is the right thing to do
#tantekand it feels wrong to be using hub.url when its not even in the spec
#cweiskejust say that as a publisher, you were doing it wrong before :)
#aaronpki've wanted to publish an extension that specifies the publisher->hub relationship for public hubs
#tantekcweiske: I'm ok to accept that, I'd just like to be able to point to an answer in case someone else asks the same question in the future
#aaronpkthe reason for not putting it in the core spec was that some hubs are built in to the publishing software and will never need that API
#tantekaaronpk: I'm ok with that too. I'm just worried that no mention of hub.url means using it is non-compliant, or rather, not something you can interoperably depend on
#aaronpki wonder if it'd be possible to add it to the spec as an optional feature for public hubs
#aaronpkor rather, external hubs (public/private distinction is not important)
#tantekso I'm seriously considering switching to hub.topic in my implementation, but then that breaks our spec design intention of not asking implementations to change to conform to the spec
#tantekthis sounds like a need for an explicit NOTE: saying Pub->Hub not defined, and or, for example, some hubs ask for "hub.url" as an informative example.