#[eddie]!tell snarfed When fed.brid.gy says 'your site will also need to support WebSub' should we be pinging our own hub or should we be pinging hub=https://bridgy-fed.superfeedr.com/ and if it's the later, what is the topic we should be passing? The full granary URL?
#Loqi[jeremy_testknown] New post, from the OS X app, which may show up on my new Known instance. If it does, that will be a good thing. Will then add plugins one at a time, I suppose, and see when and if it breaks.
#jeremycherfasMy dilemma now is what to do. I could try a clean install into the previous Stream sub-domain and then re-attach it to the old DB. Does that seem logical to you guys?
EmreSokullu joined the channel
#cweiskeI would try to debug it, but I'm a developer and you are not.
[kevinmarks] joined the channel
#[kevinmarks]that seems like it might be simpler than an import/export, assuming the DB isn't corrupt
#jeremycherfasIf the DB is the problem, then when I reattach to the old DB -- by editing config.ini -- the problem should show up again. Assuming it does not show up on the clean install.
#ZegnatJust make sure you have a back-up of the current db, in case this distorts anything
#snarfed!tell eddie,Zegnat,dgold you just need to advertise a websub hub in your atom feed. bridgy fed doesn't actually care itself; it's just how OStatus fedsocnets (and i think still Mastodon too) theoretically get your posts. will add to the docs.
#Loqisnarfed: [eddie] left you a message 6 hours, 13 minutes ago: When fed.brid.gy says 'your site will also need to support WebSub' should we be pinging our own hub or should we be pinging hub=https://bridgy-fed.superfeedr.com/ and if it's the later, what is the topic we should be passing? The full granary URL?
#Loqisnarfed: [eddie] left you a message 6 hours, 12 minutes ago: or is it that bridgy fed subscribes to my h-feed and THAT needs to be WebSub enabled?
#ZegnatAh, I don’t have an atom feed, so guess that never applies to me then
#Loqi[Gargron] >an Atom feed with activitystream data
Just an Atom feed will do too, but it needs to contain a link to a Pubsubhubbub hub
>webfinger support
Yes. Link to Atom feed, link to profile, link to salmon, magic key
>an XRD at .well-known/host-...
#[eddie]snarfed: Gotcha, so Atom feed needs the hub URL and then the Atom feed itself becomes the topic?
#Loqi[eddie]: snarfed left you a message 34 minutes ago: you just need to advertise a websub hub in your atom feed. bridgy fed doesn't actually care itself; it's just how OStatus fedsocnets (and i think still Mastodon too) theoretically get your posts. will add to the docs.
#[miklb]hmm. I wonder if my Atom feed has that, maybe that’s why Mastodon doesn’t pick up my site?
[keithjgrant] joined the channel
#[miklb]ah, it does have rel=“hub” so that’s not it
#[miklb]unless I need to ping a specific hub other than pubsubhubbub.superfeedr.com or pubsubhubbub.appspot.com
#aaronpkyou have to ping whichever hub you point to with your rel=hub
#petermolnaroh my: don't follow SQLite best practices... my search database grew to 150MB from the expected 2 due to update or insert ideas I found on the internet
#[miklb]aaronpk right but I’m wondering if Mastodon needs a different hub pinged than the 2 I am now hitting
#aaronpkmastodon should be subscribing to whatever hub you link to in rel=hub
#petermolnarsknebel I hit 2 problems: a, the is_uptodate wasn't working because int field was getting a float to check against, so on every run I did "update xyz" followed by "insert or ignore into", but it seems like this is a really bad idea when you use the fts5 engine
#[miklb]hmm. OK. I’m still not finding my posts on mastodon.social when I search
#[tantek]Any reason for hierarchical wiki categories? Flat first until we actually have problems with that? Presumably Category:PHP would be sufficient? cc: cweiske
#[tantek]looks for quotes about "premature hierarchy"
#Loqidgold: snarfed left you a message 5 hours, 4 minutes ago: you just need to advertise a websub hub in your atom feed. bridgy fed doesn't actually care itself; it's just how OStatus fedsocnets (and i think still Mastodon too) theoretically get your posts. will add to the docs.
#aaronpki guess i should move to .test but i have a whole SSL setup on .dev so it works fine
#Zegnatto be fair, this way no sleezy marketing firm gets to overload .dev. It is really just the HSTS that changed things for local development.
#snarfed!tell aaronpk,miklb,dgold,eddie as you all have noticed, following/reading/post propagation between indieweb and fedsocnets is definitely the biggest hole in bridgy fed that still really needs to be nailed down
#Loqi[snarfed] #14 docs for following and delivering posts, both directions
#sknebelsnarfed: from skimming the w3c chat, seems like the test suite is more stable/useable now
#dgoldwell, okay, I agree ith the fairness of that point, Zegnat
#sknebel(and you can find its developer there to bug if not ;))
#aaronpki don't think i know enough of how mastodon actually works, but i know the end result that I *want* to have happen
#Loqiaaronpk: snarfed left you a message 1 minute ago: as you all have noticed, following/reading/post propagation between indieweb and fedsocnets is definitely the biggest hole in bridgy fed that still really needs to be nailed down
#snarfedsknebel: https://activitypub.rocks/ ?! it was just an interactive form for generating an implementation report when i tried it a few days ago
#snarfedat least for server to server. it did zero actual testing :P
#dgoldmastodon has such multiplicity/redundancy of data-propagation, its really sorta insane
#sknebelsince I don't know if you follow the w3c chat I thought I'd report what I read to you ;)
#snarfedsknebel: i tried it all the way through. it never actually tested anything, just collected my answers to questions and generated an implementation report
#sknebelsnarfed: well, they are talking about running tests with other instances, so something has to be there now
#dgoldthe bug that was thrown up by my post, I dug around in the data, and there are something north of six different pseudo-canonical urls for each datapoint
#dgoldsnarfed: should put the atom-thing as a declaration in the fed.bridgy docs
#snarfedsknebel: since 3d ago? possible, but doubtful. i expect that was when they discussed it and when tantek pinged me
#sknebelsnarfed: ah, you might be right and I misread that. sorry
#sknebeland aaronpk just asked for clarification before I could do that
EmreSokullu and [miklb] joined the channel
#[miklb]think I’m the same as aaronpk “i don’t think i know enough of how mastodon actually works, but i know the end result that I *want* to have happen”
#Loqi[miklb]: snarfed left you a message 14 minutes ago: as you all have noticed, following/reading/post propagation between indieweb and fedsocnets is definitely the biggest hole in bridgy fed that still really needs to be nailed down
#Loqi[miklb]: snarfed left you a message 14 minutes ago: you all have researched more than me so far, and i may not prioritize it myself near term, so i'd love your input! e.g. https://github.com/snarfed/bridgy-fed/issues/14