tantek.comedited /projects (+360) "/* About This Page */ proposal: curating it to be specifically about: "Projects incubated by and also actively in use by the IndieWeb Community"" (view diff)
aaronpksnarfed: I managed to track down a weird bug in aperture where it wasn't removing the websub subscription after someone removed a subscription, so you should start seeing fewer requests to granary now that it's cleaning itself up better
ZegnatI think that one isn’t an EU Regulation but a Directive, meaning all member states have to implement it into their own laws themselves. So it would vary by country?
cweiske"It is therefore of paramount importance that users be provided with clear and comprehensive information when engaging in any activity which could result in such storage or gaining of access."
ZegnatReading that opinion, seems like the contrast thing might be in the clear. It only sets the information in the browser upon explicit request by the user for the feature
Zegnatpetermolnar, per the EU opinion, section 3.6 (“UI customization cookies”), a cookie to remember a user UI preference that the user themselfs set by “clicking on a button” is exempt from first asking consent. *BUT* only for short term storage. (page 8)
[grantcodes]Think I got my IWS project decided. I'm working on a new self contained micropub endpoint that is hopefully going to be pretty slick. Adaptable storage, realtime updates and very extendable. Wonder if I'll be able to roll it out to my website next week... Might be a bit too much
[eddie]Hmmm question for those use to iOS apps. So I’m adding a “Full Post” view to Indigenous that allows you to see the entire post content when you swipe left on a timeline article. While reading the full article, if you click on a link, would you expect it to open directly in Safari, or in In-App Safari View?
aaronpkif anything, use the sfsafariviewcontroller so that there's a built-in UI to get the link out of the app and perform other actions on it, also so that it shares system cookies
[eddie]Yeah, if I did in-app it would be SFSafariViewController, but I’m definitely learning towards opening in the native browser. Because if you wanted to open several links from the article, Safari will allow those to be separate tabs, but if its the SFVC you would have to do some magic tricks
[jgmac1106]Wondering [eddie] with today's release of Flutter if one day you just make one app (while also hoping and believing PWA will win the day and none of it will matter)
[eddie]For now, I plan to stick with pure Apple Frameworks with Swift code, and Swentel will keep working on the Android app. I tend to not be a huge believer in cross-platform frameworks
[eddie]Excellent! Thanks for the feedback [kim_landwehr]! I was worried that In-App browsers was a common expectation, but it seems like that is not the case! 🙂
[kim_landwehr]Now if I can remember that you ([eddie]) are working on the ios app and Swentel is working on the Android app. Apologize in advance because I am pretty sure I will forget a
tantek__!tell prlbr thanks improving the rel-up page! This is an excellent start. I've added a few comments / questions inline for potential ways to improve rel=up
tantek__I'm annoyed that gmail (ios app) gives you only the choice of chrome (which I don't even have installed :P) or safari, and ignores the fact that I have Firefox and Firefox Focus installed
tantek__kevinmarks can you cite an article for how a "PWA" on Android can register to handle URLs? because that would be quite useful for personal sites being able to register to handle say web+action: URLs per /webaction and /indie-config
tantek__eddie, that would be better than what Google / Gmail does (they don't actually check what apps are installed, otherwise they would provide Firefox, Firefox Focus as options, which they don't)