[eddie]!tell aaronpk I did a brainstorming session today for a potential IndieAuth extension for having a Mobile App to approve Authentication (similar to what you do with the Okta app). https://indieweb.org/RemoteAuth If you don't mind taking a look and providing feedback, it could be awesome or it could be horrible. You decide 🙂
[eddie]!tell jacky I finished writing up the idea we were talking about the other day, it's still very much a rough draft idea: https://indieweb.org/RemoteAuth
[Rose]I'm going to Seattle next week, hopefully before then I can automate the "start a trip" calls to Compass from my TripIt calendar so I don't forget.
[jgmac1106]Was I correct that there is no way to write a media query for <detail><summary > to expand by default? Could not use print media query... Had to build page... Violate DRY
[Vincent][jgmac1106] If I remember correctly that is controlled by the HTML only. If you write your HTML with <details open> instead of <details> then it should be open by default
[relapse]Since it's toggled by the presence of an attribute rather than style, I'm not sure if media queries can access it to activate it/ deactivate it. You can _detect_ it with `detail[open]` but I think that's it.
ZegnatHuh. I just added signin through indielogin to a project in less than 100 lines of code. Wonder how much this is going to grow when I handle IndieAuth myself rather than outsourcing it to aaronpk
Loqiswentel: snarfed left you a message 4 days, 16 hours ago: got it. thanks for trying! fortunately dansup is indieweb friendly and likely to merge PRs if you send him one or two to fix those issues
ZegnatWill see about doing it without indieauth.com later, and then see if there is a simple way to package this up for reuse
snarfed, [smerrill], [pfefferle], cweiske, jackjamieson, [kevinmarks], [schmarty], [cleverdevil], KartikPrabhu, micahsilverman and tglobe joined the channel
snarfedreading one or two or a few small files from disk for each user request is reasonable. magnetic disk seeks are ~10ms; SSDs are orders of magnitude faster.
[smerrill]i/o and network are going to be slower on an rpi than any dedicated server class machine; but for a personal blog it ought not matter enough to be worth worrying about.
kisik21[smerrill]: and I support WebSub so consumers are expected not to flood my site with updates but subscribe to Switchboard (which is acting as my hub) so they receive fat pings every time I post stuff
[smerrill]and depending on what else you have running, and how much memory is being used, the Linux kernel will keep pages in cache for you, to minimize disk i/o.
kisik21aaronpk: IndieAuth.com doesn't pass redirect_uri spoof protection in pyindieblog when using IndieAuth provider button; should an issue be filed despite indielogin.com being a viable and recommended replacement?
Loqiaaronpk: [eddie] left you a message 17 hours, 59 minutes ago: I did a brainstorming session today for a potential IndieAuth extension for having a Mobile App to approve Authentication (similar to what you do with the Okta app). https://indieweb.org/RemoteAuth If you don't mind taking a look and providing feedback, it could be awesome or it could be horrible. You decide 🙂
KartikPrabhu, snarfed1, [tantek] and [voss] joined the channel
[eddie]Hmmm, so I'm currently owning my code snippets on my site: https://eddiehinkle.com/code/ So now I'm thinking what does it look like if I fork existing code? For the most part it should look the same, I'm thinking you just need to link to the original source.
[eddie]Would that be considered canonical? Or since it's a fork, is my fork canonical to itself and the original source would be referred to as something else?
Loqifork is a special type of reply that is similar to an edit except with the expectation of diverging from the original rather than suggesting changes to it, and is also like a repost in that a fork displays most or all of the original likely with its changes made inline https://indieweb.org/fork
Loqifork is a form of response that is similar to an edit except with the expectation of diverging from the original rather than suggesting changes to it, and is also like a repost in that a fork displays most or all of the original likely with its changes made inline https://indieweb.org/fork
snarfedi get that we've mapped between the two a bit, and we can kind of make it work if we squint, and start to tie ourselves in knots, but i'd hate to see us try too hard to align the two entirely
aaronpki added code snippets to my site and actually treating it as a regular post was useful because i got to bring along all the other stuff that my posts do, like handling responses
Loqijacky: [eddie] left you a message 20 hours, 45 minutes ago: I finished writing up the idea we were talking about the other day, it's still very much a rough draft idea: https://indieweb.org/RemoteAuth
[tantek]site-deaths << 2019-01-03 YQL per https://developer.yahoo.com/yql/ <blockquote>As of Thursday, Jan. 3, 2019, the YQL service at query.yahooapis.com will be retired. This will impact users of datatables.org</blockquote>