#Loqi[Cobalt :neurodiv:] #IndieAuth is a pretty neat thing, and as I'm already a big #RSS user (have been since they were in general use, just never dropped them) I guess it'd be cool to have what amounts to a way to log into various sites that I don't feel called to make si...
#aaronpkNo need to mess with rel=me stuff if you already have a URL you can authenticate yourself with a password
#aaronpkIIRC it's an OAuth provider but they require dynamic client registration so that part would have to be changed
#jackyright if it detects it to be a URI it could just "accept" that
#jacky(or they can make another set of endpoints if that's too invasive)
#aaronpkdynamic client registration doesn't really make sense here because it doesn't actually provide any benefit that isn't also solved by the client_id being a URL
#jackytbh there's a higher chance of this being in glitch-soc than mainline :(
#[grantcodes]Basically I think ff follows the spec (which is mainly based on chrome extensions) and everything should be promises, which is pretty much the majority of what that polyfill does.
#ZegnatExcept when Firefox does promises they do not follow the spec ;)
#LoqiZegnat: [tantek] left you a message 5 hours, 1 minute ago: I still think you should file an issue on https://github.com/browserext/browserext/issues with what you think is the better behavior for Web Extensions
#snarfedthis shutdown is just API though, service itself isn't until april
[eddie] joined the channel
#jeremycherfas!tell [cleverdevil] Looking at your HTML for listen posts in WithKnown, wondering why you have the undisplayed version of the <h2>? Is it to avoid the icon in the visible version? How do parsers cope?
#[cleverdevil]That said, I am very much guessing that its a bug 🙂
#jeremycherfas!tell [jgmac1106] Looking at your HTML for listen posts in cleverdeil's WithKnown, I wondered why he had the undisplayed version of the <h2>? Is it to avoid the icon in the visible version? How do parsers cope? He thought it might be something you put in. Is it? What for?
#[jgmac1106]Let me take a look, was my first plugin so most probable answer is bug
#[jgmac1106]is "hidden" a boostrap selector for no display? I see it in my source code but the h2 displays fine for me
#jeremycherfasThe h2 is present twice, at least in cleverdevil's version. One hidden and with just the episode title, and one insite the h-cite, with the icon
eddiehinkle, [schmarty] and snarfed joined the channel
#[grantcodes]Probably mostly of interest to [jgmac1106] but my glitch test site is now a pretty complete little site if anyone ever wants to spin up a very quick (potentially buggy) indieweb site https://postr.glitch.me/
#sknebel(with "hidden" instead of "display:none", but same effect since "hidden" just sets display none
#jeremycherfasCan you figure out why it is there sknebel? I thought it might be for parsing reasons, but now I think it is just a relict.
snarfed joined the channel
#sknebeljeremycherfas: I'd guess so too. it's the content of the p-listen-of property, but I would have expected that the h-cite is supposed to be in there instead...
#[jgmac1106]should be easy to fix when I get the time
[tantek] joined the channel
#[tantek][jgmac1106] do you use the W3C validator or any other tools like that to check your markup? I'm curious what your markup debugging process is
#[jgmac1106]you folks are giving may too much credit and I goiung back through my commit it wsa PR from @davidmead...my process is chnage tjhis and that, see what happens, kick and curse a lot, change something else, see what happens...
#[jgmac1106]If it doesn't look pretty there I messed something up somewhere
#[jgmac1106]Will take a look at fixing plugin tomorrow, finally getting the strength back from snowblowing to try and salvage a few hours of work...did just make a photo for fun as I let the hot cocoa settle in
#[tantek]it will give you concrete specific things to fix
#[tantek]I ask because since you're also teaching people about markup, how to write it etc., it's even more essential that you have a more formal, more efficient way to do so yourself, that you can pass along to those that you teach
#[tantek]I'm assuming you want to teach something more formal than trial & error
nloadholtes, jackjamieson, leg and [davidmead] joined the channel
#[davidmead]has my commit caused issues [jgmac1106]?
bear, [frank], snarfed and jackjami_ joined the channel
#[schmarty]davidmead: i think jgmac1106 was assigning credit rather than blame :}
tw2113, jackjamieson, tbbrown and [jgmac1106] joined the channel
#[jgmac1106]said it perfectly schmarty..someone files a PR on my repo I default to they must know more than me bc I have no idea
#tw2113if i'm wrong, and the +1 would still work, i still got paid and my company did to for the work
#[tantek]aaronpk, even better: "How To Migrate From Google Login to IndieLogin"
#[tantek]in case you were looking for a timely post re: G+ shutdown
#aaronpkeh, the target audiences are very different. people who were using google login are not likely going to want their users to have to have a website
#[tantek]They're not the target audience, though it may appear as if they are. The target audience is anyone looking to help promote an independent alternative to Google for anything.
#[tantek]And on the margins, I would be that there *are* some people who added delegated google login to their sites that would be willing to switch to IndieAuth/IndieLogin
#[tantek]especially if they already had a "sign-in/up with email" separate option, *and* Google Login, then the pitch is to just replace the latter with IndieAuth / IndieLogin (while keeping the email option)
#[tantek]especially interesting would be sites that have *only* the options of email or Google Login, by which it is heavily implied that they deliberately rejected FB Login for "reasons", and for those same reasons, may find swapping out GAuth for IndieAuth appealing
jgmac1106, btrem1, ZivBK1 and gRegorLove joined the channel