#[AlisonW]Around the idea of provable control / ownership / identity issues. Hadn't looked closely at spec - will do so.
#aaronpkyeah we tried to address that kind of thing in indieauth, but there was also that issue that was brought up here a couple days ago
jenelizabeth joined the channel
#[AlisonW]Yes, seeing that discussion pass by when catching up prompted my thought. Interesting that IP address is banned as my IPs are more fixed than the domains which may point out them!
scandichainDisco, [jgmac1106], jgmac1106, gxt, [chrisaldrich], nickodd, [Sadik_Shahadu], chrisaldrich, [snarfed] and techlifeweb joined the channel
#techlifeweb[snarfed]: I'll check with my host about the 406 error Bridgy is getting with techlifeweb.com. What's odd to me is that Bridgy, Twitter and my site work fine. Instagram, not so much.
#[snarfed][techlifeweb] feel free to reconnect your bridgy twitter, just click the pause button on that page. login should work fine since it's different than Instagram, but it'll be a good test to see if webmentions etc work
#techlifeweb[snarfed]: heh, never noticed I had that old lowercase version of twitter on bridgy
#[snarfed]my fault. sadly not easy to fix systemically. (see issue above.) sigh
[dmitshur] joined the channel
#[dmitshur]A small realization about the reversal of order when working with IndieAuth compared to OAuth 2.0.
#[dmitshur]nothing too profound, but I thought it was neat.
#[dmitshur]when authenticating a user via OAuth 2.0, you generally "authenticate" first, and learn information about the user second. then you have an authenticated user.
#[dmitshur]when authenticating a user via IndieAuth, you _first_ discover information about the user, before they're authenticated. then you authenticate them. finally you have an authenticated user.
#[dmitshur](I'm aware that authenticating users via OAuth 2.0 is kinda abusing it because it's a protocol designed for authorization...)
#aaronpk[dmitshur]: yes except that with OAuth you first are making an assumption about what server the user is on
#aaronpkif you wanted to avoid that you'd have to have some initial step that asks the user what server they're on, and then that starts to look similar to IndieAuth
#[dmitshur]yeah. I should've been more specific in my example by saying "when authenticating a GitHub user via OAuth 2.0".
#Loqi[Chris Aldrich] It’s been a while since I’ve used it, but I notice that Mastodon Autopost, a WordPress plugin, wants to include titles now (but cleverly ignores them if they don’t exist), but will include an excerpt as the body. It also now allows for hashtags...
#[dmitshur]our HWCs have been happening on weekdays or weekends depending on when more people can make it, so I hope we can accommodate your schedule!
#Loqisnarfed has 50 karma in this channel over the last year (89 in all channels)
#techlifewebGot the 406 fixed but now I'm getting another mod_security error. Sigh.
#techlifewebThough this one is probably related to indieauth in general because I could never get things like OwnYourGram working
#aaronpkpossibly blocking the Authorization header then?
#techlifewebFor the sake of future searches, these where the mod_security ids they had to whitelist for brid.gy to stop returning a 406: 340157, 9009999,380122 and 340016
#techlifewebaaronpk possibly. I don't know enough about that stuff.
#techlifewebI enter my URL on https://brid.gy/instagram/start?feature=listen&x=126&y=23&scope= and I get a page saying "An appropriate representation of the requested resource could not be found on this server. This error was generated by Mod_Security." not too much to go on other than Mod_Security issue.
krychu joined the channel; techlifeweb left the channel
KartikPrabhu, gRegorLove, jenelizabeth, superjen96, DigDug, techlifeweb, wagle, [snarfed], [Michael_Beckwit and [dmitshur] joined the channel; nickodd and techlifeweb left the channel
#[dmitshur]ok, believe it or not, I might be nearly done with my web sign in support for IndieAuth (and RelMeAuth with GitHub).
#[dmitshur]what's next is reviewing and cleaning up the code.
#aaronpkbecause the first draft of indieauth used form-encoded responses, I had to make my site return that by default unless explicitly asked for json
#aaronpki'm definitely an edge case here because it's been a while since that was the default
#dmcweeneyDoes anyone know how I would remove sidebars from this page: https://drewmcweeney.com/category/freeyourmindblog/ ... I removed the sidebars for the rest of my site but this category page has sidebars. I used CSS to get rid of all the sidebars on my website so is the CSS the same? And if so, would I need a page ID to do it? How do I access a page ID from a category page?
#dmcweeneyMy CSS that I generated to remove sidebars is (this is an example for one page): /* Remove sidebars from page "Electronic Music" */ .page-id-4048 sidebar.s1.collapsed, .page-id-4048 .sidebar.s1.collapsed, .single-post .sidebar.s1.collapsed { display: none; } .page-id-4048 sidebar.s2.collapsed, .page-id-4048 .sidebar.s2.collapsed, .single-post .sidebar.s2.collapsed { display: none; }
chrisaldrich joined the channel
#[dmitshur][aaronpk] thanks for catching that. it should be fixed now, can you try again?
techlifeweb joined the channel
#chrisaldrichdmcweeney, how did you remove them from the rest of the site?
#chrisaldrichWhen I look at your site at 100% zoom in chrome, it shows up so large as to cut the sidebars off, but it looks wonky as a result.
#dmcweeneyHumean theme - If you go to this link: drewmcweeney.com/category/freeyourmindblog ... you will see the two sidebars, yet all other pages don't have the two sidebars
#chrisaldrichwhile you're using display: none, the data still all appears, it just doesn't render. You'd probably be better off removing the code that renders the sidebars altogether.